From owner-freebsd-isdn Mon Dec 14 14:58:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA26395 for freebsd-isdn-outgoing; Mon, 14 Dec 1998 14:58:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from peedub.muc.de (newpc.muc.ditec.de [194.120.126.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA26390 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 1998 14:58:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from garyj@peedub.muc.de) Received: from peedub.muc.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peedub.muc.de (8.9.1/8.6.9) with ESMTP id XAA05201 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 1998 23:44:58 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <199812142244.XAA05201@peedub.muc.de> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ITK Support Reply-To: Gary Jennejohn In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 13 Dec 1998 19:35:44 +0100." <000101be26c7$64ed8e30$53cb08d4@hwart.teuto.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 23:44:58 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id OAA26391 Sender: owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Martin Husemann" writes: >Markus Döhr wrote: > >> Are there any problems with implementing active cards? I read something >> about time critical things long time ago in a Linux list, but I'm not very >> into this stuff... > >No, no real problems if (a) the interface to the card is documented, (b) the >interface is reasonable and (c) the card behaves like the docs promise. > the real problem is that a lot of active cards require a CAPI interface, which we do not have (yet). Implementing a CAPI in a reasonable manner and interfacing it to the existing i4b structure is a problem which is being worked on (I have to get this going to support the AVM B1). --- Gary Jennejohn Home - garyj@muc.de Work - garyj@fkr.dec.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message