From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 21 19:28:12 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CF6DB00;
 Wed, 21 May 2014 19:28:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za (zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za
 [IPv6:2001:4200:7000:2::1])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F36276F;
 Wed, 21 May 2014 19:28:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za (Postfix, from userid 3973)
 id 09CE9B828; Wed, 21 May 2014 21:28:08 +0200 (SAST)
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 21:28:07 +0200
From: John Hay <jhay@meraka.org.za>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: MK_ARM_EABI to retire in current
Message-ID: <20140521192807.GA48338@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za>
References: <C66667D9-2F5E-44E0-AF04-E9DFE70BAF5A@gmail.com>
 <CAJ-VmonSHCyD-8jpK0EPkctVwpJ+Pu4dfBkvATdOS3yrN4ttVg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonSHCyD-8jpK0EPkctVwpJ+Pu4dfBkvATdOS3yrN4ttVg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 19:28:12 -0000

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:50:21AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> isn't eabi on the xscale still broken?

It might still be broken. But there are more brokenness than that. :-(
By defining WITHOUT_ARM_EABI=yes in src.conf, I can get an AVILA kernel
built that boots with src from head at around mid December. Latest 10
and head just give no output, with or without WITHOUT_ARM_EABI defined.

John

> 
> 
> -a
> 
> 
> On 19 May 2014 08:40, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > MK_ARM_EABI is going to die in current. It is the default for all platforms currently. I???m eliminating it as a build option. It must die because it invisibly (to uname) effects the ABI.
> >
> > So, to that end, I see two options:
> >
> > (1) Retire and remove oabi support.
> > (2) Retain oabi support, but change its name to armo and armoeb.
> >
> > The rough consensus of arm developers I???ve polled now, and in the past, is that we just let oabi support die now that EABI support is working for everybody.
> >
> > Before I pull the trigger on this, however, I must ask if anybody has a problem with my doing option (1), and if so, what keeps you using oabi.
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> > Warner
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"