Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:46:11 +0400 From: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@FreeBSD.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, wishmaster <artemrts@ukr.net> Cc: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@freebsd.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Enabling VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11? Message-ID: <543BBB83.6010309@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <543B648D.6020403@freebsd.org> References: <CAG=rPVe_JGy%2BeUiDjHaXXi5=n2mWGOeZjHkbVeUeS_m1z1_uMg@mail.gmail.com> <BE67D12E-E8AB-401E-8B45-6BE56C1DF2FB@ipfw.ru> <1413092963.907920156.b727jzia@frv34.fwdcdn.com> <543B648D.6020403@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13.10.2014 09:35, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 10/12/14, 1:55 PM, wishmaster wrote: >> >> --- Original message --- >> From: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@ipfw.ru> >> Date: 11 October 2014, 23:20:39 >> >> >>> On 11 Oct 2014, at 21:58, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> What action items are left to enable VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11? >>> Are there any tests results showing performance implications on >>> different network-related workloads? > > the last time we teste things vnet made things faster. > > if you spread 100 sessions over N vnets and had 100 sessions on one > system, > then there are 1/N as many locking collisions as each vnet is its own > locking domain. Sure. I'm mostly concerned about performance impact on non-virtualized workloads (e.g. web server or firewall workload types). > > Julian > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?543BBB83.6010309>