From owner-freebsd-ipfw Thu May 30 3:33: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mail.mipk-kspu.kharkov.ua (flash.mipk-kspu.kharkov.ua [194.44.157.113]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA64937B408 for ; Thu, 30 May 2002 03:32:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mipk-kspu.kharkov.ua (rainbow.mipk-kspu.kharkov.ua [192.168.9.241]) by mail.mipk-kspu.kharkov.ua (8.12.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g4UAUGoD060281; Thu, 30 May 2002 13:30:16 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from artem@mipk-kspu.kharkov.ua) Message-ID: <3CF5FF37.DB12E203@mipk-kspu.kharkov.ua> Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 13:30:15 +0300 From: "Artyom V. Viklenko" Organization: IIAT NTU "KhPI" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: ru,uk,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Noack , freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: peer-to-peer asymmetric simulation References: <20020530095844.19537.cpmta@c015.snv.cp.net> <3CF5FDB4.E57DA3C9@mipk-kspu.kharkov.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Artyom V. Viklenko" wrote: > > Yes. But not so ease. I make some drawing and attach it. > It is not absolutely correct, but in general > this is how I understand things about packet flow. > I have to say that it is correct for routed packets. Bridged packets flow as in up left picture in any value of net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass. But bottom left picture correct for both type of packets. IMHO. -- Sincerely yours, Artyom V. Viklenko. ====================================================== System Administrator artem@mipk-kspu.kharkov.ua ------------------------------------------------------ IIAT NTU "KhPI" 21, Frunze Str., Kharkov Ukraine 61002 Phone: +380 (572) 400026 Fax: +380 (572) 474062 ====================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message