Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:31:00 -0700 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@pinyon.org>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Message-ID: <199906241931.MAA00989@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 24 Jun 1999 08:39:32 MDT." <37724324.E984AFD@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > > I think it's been pretty well known since the beginning that FreeBSD > > SMP performance is nothing to cheer about. How does FreeBSD fare > > against NT or other systems on single processor systems? > > Sorry to follow up on my own message, but I noted today in PCWeek > their trip back to the benchmark lab includes ripping 3 CPUs and > 768M RAM out of the system, to benchmark how Linux and NT perform > on "lower-end" hardware. They also allowed the RedHat dudes to > switch to an Adaptec SCSI controller to talk to the RAID array. > How are we holding up under this "diminished" configuration? We don't have any numbers for that yet, and we cheat a little (using a U2W controller and U2W external RAID unit). -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199906241931.MAA00989>