From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 16 09:04:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CB81065672 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:04:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from amailer.gwdg.de (amailer.gwdg.de [134.76.10.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293AF8FC0A for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from p578b68b8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.139.104.184] helo=krabat.raven.hur) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NW45Z-0007Bx-K6; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:32:57 +0100 Message-ID: <4B5179B5.9020902@gwdg.de> Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:32:53 +0100 From: Rainer Hurling User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; de-DE; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20100112 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ed Schouten References: <20100113194254.GR64905@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <20100113194254.GR64905@hoeg.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated: Id:rhurlin X-Spam-Level: - X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: gone. All welcome . X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:04:31 -0000 On 13.01.2010 20:42 (UTC+1), Ed Schouten wrote: > [..snip..] > I've noticed there is some breakage in ports, but it shouldn't be too > serious. I've seen cases where an application includes, even > though it doesn't use anything provided by that header. In other cases > they used fields like UT_NAMESIZE to derive the maximum user name length > supported by the system, which is clearly not what this definition was > intended for. I've incremented __FreeBSD_version to 900007 to identify > the import of utmpx. In case a certain port breaks badly, let me know > and I'm willing to take a look at it. > > Be sure to give it a try and report any issues. Thanks! > After updating my system i tried to rebuild Xorg ports. All went fine until it has to compile x11/sessreg. It seems that the configure script does not find struct 'utmpx.ut_syslen' and so the build process falls back to utmp? Could you please take a look if this is an issue of the new interface. This is on 9.0-CURRENT (amd64). Thanks in advance, Rainer