From owner-freebsd-current Thu May 9 8: 0:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (rwcrmhc52.attbi.com [216.148.227.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8453037B403; Thu, 9 May 2002 08:00:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org ([12.233.149.189]) by rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020509150015.RCFH25294.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@bmah.dyndns.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 15:00:15 +0000 Received: from intruder.bmah.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g49F0EL8040513; Thu, 9 May 2002 08:00:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.bmah.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by intruder.bmah.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g49F0Emt040512; Thu, 9 May 2002 08:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200205091500.g49F0Emt040512@intruder.bmah.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5+ 20020506 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Jeremy Lea Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The future of perl on FreeBSD In-reply-to: <20020509110114.A64078@shale.csir.co.za> References: <20020508075112.66AB638FD@overcee.wemm.org> <20020508035501.72d32dfc.gclarkii@vsservices.com> <20020508155202.GE85290@electricjellyfish.net> <200205081608.g48G8W5p029919@intruder.bmah.org> <20020509110114.A64078@shale.csir.co.za> Comments: In-reply-to Jeremy Lea message dated "Thu, 09 May 2002 11:01:14 +0200." From: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 08:00:14 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If memory serves me right, Jeremy Lea wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:08:32AM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > Oh yes, pkg_version will need to be rewritten too, because it uses Perl. > > I don't know how hard that will be...I haven't even looked at the code > > in over a year. I don't have any interest in doing this, but I'm sure > > one of you src/ gurus can whip something up. :-) > > I'll see if I can do something this weekend. It'll be in C, and make > the version comparison part of the library. Great...thanks! > I'm not going to look at pkg_upgrade, because people are using > portupgrade instead. Last I looked, it's been cvs rm'ed anyways. Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message