Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:59:04 +0400 From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: Max Brazhnikov <makc@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-wm/stumpwm Makefile Message-ID: <86sk4msvtj.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201006141228.o5ECSADC004581@repoman.freebsd.org> (Max Brazhnikov's message of "Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:28:10 %2B0000 (UTC)") References: <201006141228.o5ECSADC004581@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Max Brazhnikov <makc@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> makc 2010-06-14 12:28:10 UTC
>
> FreeBSD ports repository
>
> Modified files:
> x11-wm/stumpwm Makefile
> Log:
> Build with lang/sbcl by default, clisp lacks x11 module
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.8 +1 -1 ports/x11-wm/stumpwm/Makefile
I think PORTREVISION should be bumped, too. This case matches one in
Porter's Handbook:
Examples of when PORTREVISION should be bumped:
- Changes to the port Makefile to enable or disable compile-time
options in the package.
Looking at http://pointyhat.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.8.20100613205040/stumpwm-0.9.7.log
it has Makefile@r1.7 even though build date is Wed Jun 16 09:14:22 UTC 2010.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86sk4msvtj.fsf>