Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 18:22:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Paul Pathiakis <pathiaki2@yahoo.com> To: "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Port Request: FreeIPA Message-ID: <1002905841.619944.1506709337315@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1002905841.619944.1506709337315.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, It seems very useful.=C2=A0 I ended up in an environment using it.=C2=A0 (Y= eah, CentOS... but....)=C2=A0 It's really quite amazing. Most of the requisite software is already ported with the exception of the = OpenPKI system known as 'Dogtag'. Between SSSD and FreeIPA, it seems like something truly useful has emerged = to allow full integration into Windoze environments.=C2=A0=C2=A0 At the end of the day, AD is pretty impressive.=C2=A0 The gap between it's = 'ease of use' and LDAP is LARGE.=C2=A0 However, FreeIPA.... not so big of a= gap. Thank you, P. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 29 18:23:04 2017 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7864E32800 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 18:23:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EB4870C56 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 18:23:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.89 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <lists@opsec.eu>) id 1dxzwH-000HHU-5P; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 20:23:05 +0200 Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 20:23:05 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Thomas Mueller <mueller6722@twc.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster? Message-ID: <20170929182305.GE86601@home.opsec.eu> References: <81D84A650858BA40BF6936408052E6BC0138263988@msgdb11.utad.utoledo.edu> <k20i-pniy-wny@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 18:23:04 -0000 Hi! > What is one officially supposed to use to build and upgrade > packages from source? I doubt that we already have a 'official' consensus, but buildung using poudriere, while expensive from the hardware resource point of view, looks to me as the most stable way to do it. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1002905841.619944.1506709337315>