From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jul 20 11:41:39 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id LAA18485 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 20 Jul 1995 11:41:39 -0700 Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.34]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA18479 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 1995 11:41:35 -0700 Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id EAA04548; Fri, 21 Jul 1995 04:40:07 +1000 Date: Fri, 21 Jul 1995 04:40:07 +1000 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199507201840.EAA04548@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: hackers@freebsd.org, rpt@miles.sso.loral.com Subject: Re: ramspeed results - ?? Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >I picked up ramspeed from this list a week ago or so. Ran it last night. >1> Don't know how long it took, but it was over 90 minutes. >2> iT's 486DX66, BT SCSI2 VLB controller, 8 MB memory >Results - > 49005fb0 44.464 uS/op 2.25e+04 op/sec 0.086 mb/sec > 8938c0df 44.845 uS/op 2.23e+04 op/sec 0.085 mb/sec >What is this telling me. How does it compare? Is the 3rd a disk swap rate >or something? This tells me that ramspeed was thrashing and testing vm instead of real memory. I think it assumes either 16MB or 32MB of memory. Bruce