From owner-cvs-ports  Thu Feb  9 16:45:20 1995
Return-Path: cvs-ports-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id QAA24040 for cvs-ports-outgoing; Thu, 9 Feb 1995 16:45:20 -0800
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.223.46]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA23969; Thu, 9 Feb 1995 16:42:30 -0800
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id QAA13248; Thu, 9 Feb 1995 16:42:23 -0800
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.9/8.6.9) id QAA00691; Thu, 9 Feb 1995 16:42:06 -0800
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 1995 16:42:06 -0800
Message-Id: <199502100042.QAA00691@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jkh@freebsd.org
CC: jkh@freebsd.org, CVS-commiters@time.cdrom.com, cvs-ports@time.cdrom.com
In-reply-to: <13195.792376622@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@freebsd.org)
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/netpbm/pkg PLIST
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=)
Sender: cvs-ports-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Well, I just modified it so that a `make package' actually worked.

My point is that it was *already* working after my commit of patch-ad.
I *did* a build on thud after I committed the patch, and the result is
sitting happily in wcarchive's package/netpbd.tgz.  Can you please
check it?

 * If I weren't working on an up-to-date copy, I think CVS would have
 * whined, yes?

I don't know where you are working, so I can't comment on this.  But
whatever you have is definitely not the latest version if it fails
with the previos PLIST.

Satoshi