Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 14:49:17 +1000 From: Rob B <rbyrnes@ozemail.com.au> To: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RFC: removing Turbochannel support for 5.0-current? Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20020701144647.01bbfaa0@pop.ozemail.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20020630195224.GG70344@cicely5.cicely.de> References: <15647.23076.260503.7357@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20020630191443.A36002@freebie.xs4all.nl> <15647.23076.260503.7357@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 05:52 1/07/2002, Bernd Walter sent this up the stick: >On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 03:21:08PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > > Wilko Bulte writes: > > > Given that Turbochannel support and support for the machines that have > > > TC buses has been left to rot AND the machines that have TC are > > > about as fast as 486s running current: > > > > Well, they're a good deal faster than multias, and some masoc^H^H^H^H > > people run -current on them ;) > >Realy? - I asked for Multia owners a while back and got no answer. Well, I spose you could count me in, except that the Multia is offline at the moment - and I will be running 4-STABLE on it when I get it going again. Cheers, Rob -- Anybody can win, unless there happens to be a second entry. [15200.8 km (8207.8 mi), 262.8 deg](Apparent) Rennerian This is random quote 210 of a collection of 1253 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.1.0.14.2.20020701144647.01bbfaa0>