Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 Jul 2013 06:15:49 -0700
From:      Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>
To:        mexas@bristol.ac.uk
Cc:        fortran@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: objections to MAINTAINER=fortran@ in devel/fpp
Message-ID:  <201307211315.r6LDFntI006687@slippy.cwsent.com>
In-Reply-To: Message from Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bris.ac.uk> of "Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:08:14 %2B0100." <201307171608.r6HG8Eo2022826@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <201307171608.r6HG8Eo2022826@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>, 
Anton
Shterenlikht writes:
> (copy to ports@ in case some users of devel/fpp are not on fortran@)
> 
> devel/fpp is a Fortran pre-processor.
> It is unmaintained.
> I think fortran@ list is the most logical maintainer.
> 
> Any objections?

None from me, though I'm not taking on the role of lead developer here.


-- 
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>
FreeBSD UNIX:  <cy@FreeBSD.org>   Web:  http://www.FreeBSD.org





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201307211315.r6LDFntI006687>