Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:54:05 -0600
From:      Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd@dreamchaser.org
Cc:        Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Subject: Thunderbird causing system crash, need guidance
Message-ID:  <CA%2BtpaK3trYoJJXgv_r%2BqSD3Pr0g=3kTATyBShYFFWGLDpdRQdA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5fbcd05c-ce12-b1a4-a9e9-79276dad7183@dreamchaser.org>
References:  <201712110045.vBB0jCTQ078476@nightmare.dreamchaser.org> <CA%2BtpaK0sG31TckxL8orNmAD0ZXSz7rJzEotjsCEtASw9u2COZg@mail.gmail.com> <38e2ef70-fa1b-25bf-4447-752006418d0a@dreamchaser.org> <20171211135803.d1aff6c8.freebsd@edvax.de> <5fbcd05c-ce12-b1a4-a9e9-79276dad7183@dreamchaser.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Gary Aitken <freebsd@dreamchaser.org>
wrote:

>
> The ordering part I understand; what I don't understand is why it (as I
> recall) rebooted successfully with no warnings in spite of the
> background_fsck="NO" being set and when one of the disks apparently
> didn't fsck properly.  I thought it should have halted in single-user
> mode and waited for me to do a full fsck manually.


That happens if the preen fails.  See the man page I pointed you to.  There
are cases where it can miss things.  You can set:

fsck_y_enable="YES"

If you want it to handle a failed preen automatically.

I don't think background fsck presence or lack of had much to do with
this.  It is a popular whipping boy.

A regular foreground fsck may not be a bad idea if your system is prone
disk errors or hard crashes.  Perhaps sysutils/diskcheckd or a periodic
entry, but under *normal* circumstances such things are not needed.
-- 
Adam



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK3trYoJJXgv_r%2BqSD3Pr0g=3kTATyBShYFFWGLDpdRQdA>