Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:13:54 +0100
From:      Chris Whitehouse <cwhiteh@onetel.com>
To:        ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade - Deprecated?
Message-ID:  <4F869CD2.2040702@onetel.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F864EEE.4010508@p6m7g8.com>
References:  <4F863615.80203@shatow.net>	<CAF6rxgn5O8LvUAL_EBdz0ji91ZE=ayX-fJVoNbx01YxoMCAWJg@mail.gmail.com> <4F864EEE.4010508@p6m7g8.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/04/2012 04:41, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> On 04/12/12 03:39, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 11 April 2012 21:55, Bryan Drewery<bryan@shatow.net>  wrote:
>>> Hi Phillip,
>>>
>>> Your last commit on portupgrade [1] indicates to consider portmaster
>>> instead. What are the thoughts on this? Just the lack of a maintainer?
>>
>> Open PRs that indicate long lasting bugs with no upstream maintainer.
>> If you would like to pick up development of portupgrade please go
>> ahead!
>>
>>> I was considering writing/submitting a patch to support pkgng with
>>> portupgrade.
>>
>> There are many that would be thankful. If you wish to become the
>> upstream maintainer and release new versions, fix bugs, deal with
>> existing PRs please do so. I'll be happy to commit the new version.
>>
>
> I'd say with Eitan said, but the architecture and dependencies of
> portupgrade make this a daunting task to say the least; however, feel
> free to try.
>

Hi

I'm only a lurker and lowly user but could I humbly request that 
portmanager is brought back into use? It's simple to use and does what 
it does extremely well and without fuss. I think the fact that it still 
"just works" after all this time is a mark of it's worth.

thanks

Chris




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F869CD2.2040702>