Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 06:41:55 -0400 From: Rick Miller <vmiller@hostileadmin.com> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Poudriere Build of pkg_* repos? Message-ID: <CAHzLAVGT0Li5Jg0j0L-UTObRcYogGWOxsLdGhJUMYWVRLxo%2Bog@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54233850.2070807@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAHzLAVGcGPQP3NvaSpe6%2BidLdEWM4hrQyPwP6YVPvOO-J823Fw@mail.gmail.com> <54233850.2070807@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks Bryan... On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 9/24/2014 3:35 PM, Rick Miller wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Does the EOL of legacy pkg_* tools in FreeBSD Ports affect Poudriere's > > ability to build legacy package repos? > > No. Poudriere still supports it as long as you're using an older ports > tree. > > > > > Poudriere was able to build a legacy pkg_* repo from a snapshot of Ports > > from around the time releng/10.0 received the patch for -p7, but it > failed > > to build a legacy repo from a snapshot taken today and instead built a > > pkg(8) repo despite make.conf having WITHOUT_PKGNG=yes. > > > > Aside: Actually, it seemed to ignore the make.conf altogether as it > > contains PERL_VERSION=5.14.4 and built 5.16 instead. > > It must be /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf > > > Provided this is the case, what suggestions are there for patching > today's > > bash remote execution vulnerability[1] in a version of Ports that can be > > built into a legacy repo? > > Just apply the patch via files/ and use EXTRA_PATCHES: > > http://dan.langille.org/2014/06/10/freebsd-custom-port-patches-when-using-poudriere/ Excellent! Thanks! -- Take care Rick Miller
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHzLAVGT0Li5Jg0j0L-UTObRcYogGWOxsLdGhJUMYWVRLxo%2Bog>