From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Jun  8 04:31:47 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id EAA29248
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 8 Jun 1996 04:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NS.Contrib.Com (NS.Contrib.Com [194.77.12.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA29125;
          Sat, 8 Jun 1996 04:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from src@localhost) by NS.Contrib.Com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id NAA27899; Sat, 8 Jun 1996 13:30:01 +0200
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 1996 13:30:01 +0200
From: Heiko Blume <src@NS.Contrib.Com>
Message-Id: <199606081130.NAA27899@NS.Contrib.Com>
To: terry@lambert.org
CC: jkh@time.cdrom.com, terry@lambert.org, grog@lemis.de, hackers@FreeBSD.org,
        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: <199606072342.QAA04537@phaeton.artisoft.com> (message from Terry Lambert on Fri, 7 Jun 1996 16:42:54 -0700 (MST))
Subject: Re: The -stable problem: my view
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

helloo


i'd like to mention that we have implemented CVS
for a big software development effort with more
than 100 developers at several sites and VERY many
lines of code. it works very well. however, things
had to planned very carefully. my partner sascha@contrib.com
has done this, so maybe the ones of you working with CVS
the most should poke him a little.

rgds hb