From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 9 23:11:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gatekeeper.tsc.tdk.com (gatekeeper.tsc.tdk.com [207.113.159.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546E51513E for ; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 23:11:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gdonl@tsc.tdk.com) Received: from sunrise.gv.tsc.tdk.com (root@sunrise.gv.tsc.tdk.com [192.168.241.191]) by gatekeeper.tsc.tdk.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA18697; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 23:11:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gdonl@tsc.tdk.com) Received: from salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com (salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com [192.168.241.194]) by sunrise.gv.tsc.tdk.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA19577; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 23:11:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gdonl@localhost) by salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA19435; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 23:11:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Message-Id: <199910100611.XAA19435@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 23:11:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: Marcel Moolenaar "Re: merging current's jail functionality to stable" (Oct 9, 6:51pm) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 alpha(3) 7/19/95) To: Marcel Moolenaar , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: merging current's jail functionality to stable Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Oct 9, 6:51pm, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: } Subject: Re: merging current's jail functionality to stable } To approach this from a different angle: How long will 3.x be -stable } and can we afford to wait that long for jail to be a -stable feature? While I have a need for the jail functionality, I also need a working a working nullfs implementation to use with it. Somehow I don't thing we'll see a working nullfs in 3.x, so I guess I can wait for 4.x. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message