Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:05:41 +0100
From:      Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl>
To:        Gary Kline <kline@thought.org>
Cc:        Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: best archiver? (for music)
Message-ID:  <20090315080541.GB16322@slackbox.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20090315035101.GA28705@thought.org>
References:  <20090313191520.GA14233@thought.org> <20090313202226.GA47453@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903132128460.33043@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090314030558.GB25027@thought.org> <20090314072602.GA75036@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090315035101.GA28705@thought.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--wq9mPyueHGvFACwf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 08:51:02PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 08:26:02AM +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 08:05:59PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> > > > lame -h -V 3 - nobody could tell the difference, it gives <200kbps =
bitrate
> > > > lame -h -b 192 - as above
> > > > lame -h -b 128 - they were able to tell difference, but not on all=
=20
> > > > music/songs
> > > >=20
> > > > lame -h -b 96 - i was able to tell the difference on every song, bu=
t it=20
> > > > wasn't really huge deal.
> >=20
> > > 	my hearing is exceptionally good and while call myself an
> > > 	audiophile,  having all my tunes right here at fingertips is=20
> > > 	a major win.  having said that, can you point me to a basic
> > > 	tutorial on lame?=20
> >=20
> > man lame
>=20
>=20
> 	GADGOOKS! that's no tutorial, that's *torture*.  After i finally=20
> 	got caught up on miised sleep, a few hours ago I read-thru and
> 	listened-to (kttsd) the man lame.  Then surfed around; then came
> 	back to the man page and read the several examples.  So: the idea
> 	is that lame ["just"] converts WAV files to mp3.=20

Yep. That's what it does. It's the UNIX philosophy; do one thing and do it =
well.
If you're not an expert you should probably stick with one of the
--preset modes. E.g. '--preset medium' or '--preset standard'. That will
give you variable bitrate files with good quality.

>       There is a gnome utility, sound-juicer than turns my CD's from
> 	wave to ogg-vorbis.  I'm happy with ogg but would prefer flac
> 	... but ogg is fine.  mp4 is a dontknow.  What I've got is good
> 	enough for now.

It looks like sound-juicer should be able to make flac files as well:
http://www.burtonini.com/computing/screenshots/sj-prefs.png, probably
depending on if you have the right gstreamer plugins installed. The
freebsd port of sound-juicer depends on the ogg vorbis and flac
gstreamer plugins.

> > >	i've got 1581620 blocks of mp3 @ 128kbit.
> > > 	lectures.  when i tried to cut the quality even by a bit it was
> > > 	evident immediately.  rar compresses these file to
> > > 	1482404 blocks very very slowly.  it probably makes sense to just
> > > 	burn the mp3 files to a dvd and be safe. =20
> >=20
> > There is a special codec for speech. You'll find it the
> > audio/speex port. From the pkg-descr:
> >=20
> >   The Speex is a patent-free, Open Source/Free Software voice codec.
> >   Unlike other codecs like MP3 and Ogg Vorbis, Speex is designed to
> >   compress voice at bitrates in the 2-45 kbps range.  Possible
> >   applications include VoIP, Internet audio streaming, archiving of
> >   speech data (e.g. voice mail), and audio books. In some sense, it is
> >   meant to be complementary to the Ogg Vorbis codec.
> >=20
> > This might perform better at compressing lectures.

> 	Sounds v promising, thanks. =20
>=20
> 	Given the availability of compression these days, it makes me
> 	wonder why telephone conversations still sound so 'tinny'.  But
> 	then, that's another matter.

The speakers in telephones are tiny. That's probably a large part of it.

The codec used to digitize voice signals for current DECT phones, G.726
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G.726] dates from 1990, so it was limited
to the technology of that time. Modern codecs like speex probably do a
better job!

Roland
--=20
R.F.Smith                                   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)

--wq9mPyueHGvFACwf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD)

iEUEARECAAYFAkm8ttUACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUQvwCXfj0N4NhFnGLyAhqAGHKNc4+x
wwCdE1gEx5FLFxeSvRGMvcul+iNe3vA=
=cfWr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wq9mPyueHGvFACwf--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090315080541.GB16322>