From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jun 28 07:53:37 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B77F1065676
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:53:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from brix@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from solow.pil.dk (relay.pil.dk [195.41.47.164])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457368FC14
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:53:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from brix@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from tirith.brixandersen.dk (0x55534f5f.adsl.cybercity.dk
	[85.83.79.95]) by solow.pil.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673771CCBD0
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:38:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by tirith.brixandersen.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id AF4AB1141D; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:38:07 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:38:07 +0200
From: Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20080628073807.GB45690@tirith.brixandersen.dk>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
References: <E2C84A13-15E7-4BFE-B44F-A4C27966188C@cyberlifelabs.com>
	<4e571dd70806271037j59faed19y8d3e29423c9d8a2@mail.gmail.com>
	<1E7FB809-CFBE-4ED6-9F32-97C90359BBF9@cyberlifelabs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1E7FB809-CFBE-4ED6-9F32-97C90359BBF9@cyberlifelabs.com>
X-PGP-Key: http://www.brixandersen.dk/files/HenrikBrixAndersen.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Subject: Re: Curious about SCM choice
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:53:37 -0000


--JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 06:26:54PM -0700, Milo Hyson wrote:
> Can not the "decentralized" systems like Mercurial and GIT be used in a=
=20
> centralized fashion? Our internal experiments certainly show them to be=
=20
> every bit as capable as Subversion in this regard. Has your experience be=
en=20
> different?

They _can_ be used in centralized fashion, but they do not enforce
it. Subversion enforces a centralized development model.

Brix
--=20
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@FreeBSD.org>

--JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)
Comment: GnuPG signed

iEYEARECAAYFAkhl6l8ACgkQv+Q4flTiePi8EwCfce5cJSdMu6H6LIk6vgWHI5Ve
5TQAoKuD/UsWjDZ4exBLmjt6jKl5oVzp
=x11B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq--