From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 8 13:38:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC01106564A for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 13:38:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@letinet.org) Received: from australia.timcompany.ru (australia.timcompany.ru [85.142.55.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09FC88FC15 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 13:38:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41169 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2010 17:12:02 +0400 Received: (qmail 46320 invoked by uid 1001); 8 Oct 2010 17:12:01 +0400 Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 17:12:01 +0400 From: Roman Levitskiy To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101008131201.GA46115@dio.home> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20101007132209.GA47648@rancor.immure.com> <20101007135138.GA81306@icarus.home.lan> <20101007162243.GA48756@rancor.immure.com> <20101008083107.GA80449@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101008083107.GA80449@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> X-Disclaimer: This message represens the official view of the voices in my head. X-OS: FreeBSD/i386 8.1-STABLE (dio.home) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: New mutt-devel problems with text/html processing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 13:38:45 -0000 On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 09:31:08 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 11:26:06AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 06:51:38AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 08:22:09AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > I missed the beginning of this thread. I had mutt-devel until > about a week ago, when, after some update, it became extremely > slow. For example, using just /var/mail it would take 10 seconds > or more to move from one message to another in index. The same > delay for opening messages in pager. The size of messages was > same as before, mostly 2-3 lines with occasional attachment. Hi List, I didn't notice any slow down, only MIME issue. -- Roman