From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 00:40:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95D9106564A for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:40:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from blue.seahorse.syndicate@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4D88FC14 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so1980586qcs.13 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:40:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:date:to:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :from:organization:message-id:user-agent; bh=0KDotRhmhiX9+/tYs0Bw+ypmg68aR1UUxQ1+RrEp7WQ=; b=HXCvjO5rcNttESwoKjZ/BY9sODCnIeCWb6GaAT/om/bZR4Y1BuWo7Yk8RxvxXtbzDh Oc4+FYP8tP+05Uc/E+UhHBd4NZcCMQRq8TpG2NqdFC+ygNdTKOINL2jYt+TR/oNmssVS 6/laj9F5VOZnrn8/Lk7MaYBd8MOY3dd4kcuxsuFqfHIygLThDoLIQXq0gqp2WlpWaKrv o1voByU3y9QKMPkk/lJb1/wSFk8YtoLCr/QoDJUtUQCn/yX+FsbnX1kGBzJcg18kHh6s Zc0zvJOALRyqmd4MPhuYNW0YM8VgY3mm703jEJmarkcRmRkuJaC8ydv3Jh70FmHbaU8F sP9g== Received: by 10.224.116.9 with SMTP id k9mr7055993qaq.14.1344732024516; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:40:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blueleafone.quebecconnection (pool-72-73-110-4.ptldme.east.myfairpoint.net. [72.73.110.4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fx5sm3567099qab.14.2012.08.11.17.40.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 20:40:21 -0400 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Lynn Steven Killingsworth" Organization: Blue Seahorse Syndicate Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (FreeBSD) Subject: Flashplayer expiration & mini-mainframes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:40:25 -0000 Dear FreeBSD - I am looking forward to installing PC-BSD 9.1 at the end of the week!! The Adobe website states that Flashplayer 11.2 will be the last ported to Linux [although it will forever received security updates.] Flashplayer 11.3 I believe is the first to offer 64-bit support. It is rumored here that Opera 12.5 is to be 64-bit - and could be ready now except that Opera is writing their own Flashplayer like plugin. Are we that lucky? I have been thinking about nearly commodity mini-mainframes for some months and it appears that FreeBSD is the most well positioned. I have heard that 1 in 6 'PC' server buyers asks their vendor for mainframe functions such as are provided by ia64. Surely ASUS and Supermicro would know that. I do not know how long it takes to write a kernel but I here the Linux camp is whispering that they need an ia64 kernel. FreeBSD must have been optimizing it ia64 kernel for at least 6 years. Is FreeBSD that lucky? And of course I suppose AMD must want both a PC and workstation chip and a different workstation and server chip? -- Steve Blue Seahorse Syndicate http://www.blueleafsyndicate.org Maine & New Hampshire Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 01:42:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1391065674 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:42:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rjhjr0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0898FC16 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so6157633obb.13 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:42:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=EgCCIY3+nryeXUTVw2Kw5PS8yHSXpyH1UO+gYHwpuoU=; b=Y4YXqKY8qtKD6FhhsKurXQyyv1yRuF3J4OxRznCOTfuHyAcpbkVe60W3a+73spXI/b Grzypist8+ENBw1pujYQLPzH82baCkNVgJkOELgTyfCgzv1aE+6smYvc+znSoDJJMsn/ uWFkSWwsp4eeNh/ASTeMbPXyBWQlKF4QsmlhQdWycQfeHdonm9Fsy1FxZFKogl6V2mUc hyz0mY+cacaO/r9rcSfGMQqF0LnbLBoninYLzOw07kIimY/lyZVBKqi2Fu8SIYQWL6Rm P4DKNhTqXXYb3k4oPrHsBX2IvTbqbOTHjt+hGJuRLOv3oqVXER7eVAgn3Mhd0uUuvMsW YDiw== Received: by 10.182.42.65 with SMTP id m1mr4216208obl.11.1344735722739; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip98-163-115-74.dc.dc.cox.net. [98.163.115.74]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o9sm2037833oeg.5.2012.08.11.18.42.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:42:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 21:41:57 -0400 From: Bob Hall To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20120812014156.GA67933@stainmore> References: <20120811191856.GA28865@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120811191856.GA28865@thought.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: what is the best kind of KVM Switch? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:42:03 -0000 On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 12:18:59PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > > guys, > > can any of you with hardware background tell me which are > the better KVM makes? about three weeks ago my "Belkin > soho" 4-port kvm switch started going flakey on port #1. > > I ordered a new one, same make//model except with PS/2 > plugs. it arrived 100% DOA. I'Ve finally found > somebody willing to come over and help me. Fry's is about > 12 clicks away. they have not too many. maybe an > "iogear" (sp?). is there really that much diff between kvm > switch? and if there is, which should I be looking for? I've used Belkins. They've been flakey. I'm currently on my third year with an Aten and have had no problems. I bought this cheap off the Internet so I don't know what they usually sell for. There was some discussion here about KVM switches just before I bought mine and everyone who mentioned Aten said good things about it. Best of luck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 04:00:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4062B106566C for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 04:00:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reckingball62@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0260B8FC08 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 04:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so6348000obb.13 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 21:00:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Vk25q0P8Jd2icWE3v97hDD+xgQYQIKMUQuEZaq/Y7OM=; b=FoP6pT+x562g+S0nW1RiLXKTq4E7S5y3FvtwR0S66a8bIQPIiHtuFStg9khaS47yIz JJNcO4Y1RyCb7w19OVmaotzzqEXaIBad5SwldU5HLtC5BNYjJB8zXvjPyujj9N72yMjI +Ag5yWHo6reRGmYfb3vytA0RMlhg3U6gvxNJF2VkD4M1P31+Wu4d1FSr7/3AG2//bo52 EMVzP8fPxpQM82OCtY/GCrXsWew9yQ6h1ZrL+WDUsT+YX0/cmLHemWAVbmxMBmFDIE6x iMAJazeeZ33S2LOiggBoMqAWtAKIeRPUHYHU7urCoZqdePWCVT39HrwmprUi+O5B9lEG JsWg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.207.106 with SMTP id lv10mr2208536igc.0.1344744011252; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 21:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.195.146 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 21:00:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120809055018.GG25781@kontrol.kode5.net> References: <50234C4C.7040809@mail.com> <20120809055018.GG25781@kontrol.kode5.net> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 23:00:11 -0500 Message-ID: From: Andy Recker To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: mac powerpc ibook g3 blank screen on start up X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 04:00:18 -0000 thanks for the help but there is no CD icon there is no anything to click on my computer is very unresponsive let e know if u have any other ideas? On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: > == Jeff Tipton wrote on Thu 9.Aug'12 at 8:36:12 +0300 == > > > On 08/09/2012 06:22, Andy Recker wrote: > > >i installed the power PC version of free BSD and put it on my mac i > book g3 > > >i was in the insulation process when i couldn't get it to work because > of a > > >few errors and i decided to turn it off and restart when i turned it > back > > >on it only booted to a blank white screen it has nothing on it and > nothing > > >is responsive i have tried to reboot the same CD i had the first thing > and > > >still just a blank screen what can i do to get BSD to work on my > computer? > > >_______________________________________________ > > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > When you are trying to reboot into the installation CD, are you sure > > you have the right boot sequence selected (CD, not HDD)? I guess on > > your mac it might mean restarting, holding down the option key, > > choosing the CD icon and the arrow on the right side. > > > > -Jeff > > Yes, it's either the 'option' key or the 'C' key; can' recall which. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 07:26:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EA9106564A for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 07:26:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juyx2@yahoo.com) Received: from smtplq03.aruba.it (smtplq-out6.aruba.it [62.149.158.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CE678FC12 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 07:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28479 invoked by uid 89); 12 Aug 2012 07:26:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp3.aruba.it) (62.149.158.223) by smtplq03.aruba.it with SMTP; 12 Aug 2012 07:26:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 27894 invoked by uid 89); 12 Aug 2012 07:26:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Dale-PC) (82.61.157.91) by smtp3.ad.aruba.it with SMTP; 12 Aug 2012 07:26:39 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by web335.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:30:30 -1100 Message-Id: <3R88YYJ8.2460U3I@yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 22:30:30 -0800 From: "Gordon Cox" User-Agent: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; 68K) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "customer" X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: smtp3.ad.aruba.it 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: smtplq03.aruba.it 1.6.2 0/1000/N Subject: Hi! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 07:26:43 -0000 Hello customer, You don't have to reply, this is a test. I have a new website someurl.com You are welcome! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 08:23:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A370106564A for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from avasout07.plus.net (avasout07.plus.net [84.93.230.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD10D8FC0C for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:23:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout07 with smtp id lkL71j006516WCc01kL8nT; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:20:09 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=bbrpoZzB c=1 sm=1 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=rLpCYgkgFLgA:10 a=CbD3Oajucd4A:10 a=ZTb9aqGL9YkA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=iYnnk4MwKUOgrmjG-sAA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1T0TP4-00012O-U0 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:20:07 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:20:06 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20120811191856.GA28865@thought.org> <20120812014156.GA67933@stainmore> In-Reply-To: <20120812014156.GA67933@stainmore> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201208120920.06659.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) Subject: Re: what is the best kind of KVM Switch? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:23:19 -0000 On Sunday 12 August 2012 02:41:57 Bob Hall wrote: > I'm currently on my third year > with an Aten and have had no problems. I've been using a cheap Aten CS-64A 4 Port Mini KVM for nearly 6 years now with no problems. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 09:12:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3C4106566C for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:12:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3378FC0A for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:12:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Message-ID: <5027737C.6060601@intersonic.se> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 11:12:28 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120525 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Linux app shared memory problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:12:39 -0000 Trying to run a Linux app under 9-STABLE. I can start it once and stop it once but all subsequent efforts produces a core dump. I believe the reason being that this app stores licensing information in shared memory and when it stops first time it fails to remove this info. Is there a sysctl parameter that would be useful in a case like this? Thanks, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 09:27:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DC21065674 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:27:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE208FC0A for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7C9ROjh044087; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 11:27:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q7C9ROdw044084; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 11:27:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 11:27:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Lynn Steven Killingsworth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 12 Aug 2012 11:27:25 +0200 (CEST) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Flashplayer expiration & mini-mainframes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:27:29 -0000 > The Adobe website states that Flashplayer 11.2 will be the last ported to > Linux [although it will forever received security updates.] Flashplayer 11.3 > I believe is the first to offer 64-bit support. It is rumored here that > Opera 12.5 is to be 64-bit - and could be ready now except that Opera is > writing their own Flashplayer like plugin. Are we that lucky? no. we are not. We would be really lucky if there would be no way to run flashplayer at all, so nobody would do it, and persuade usage of standard instead of running binary only packages doing unknown things. For movies from youtube use youtube-dl > I have been thinking about nearly commodity mini-mainframes for some months what is mini-mainframe? > and it appears that FreeBSD is the most well positioned. I have heard that 1 > in 6 'PC' server buyers asks their vendor for mainframe functions such as are > provided by ia64. Surely ASUS and Supermicro would know that. I do not know > how long it takes to write a kernel but I here the Linux camp is whispering > that they need an ia64 kernel. FreeBSD must have been optimizing it ia64 > kernel for at least 6 years. Is FreeBSD that lucky? And of course I suppose No idea. Nobody serious would buy new ia64 hardware now, assuming it still is possible. No idea how much ia64 kernel is optimized - ask ia64 users if you find one ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 09:52:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAF0106566C for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:52:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD3C8FC08 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:52:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Message-ID: <50277CCA.4010908@intersonic.se> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 11:52:10 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120525 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: <5027737C.6060601@intersonic.se> In-Reply-To: <5027737C.6060601@intersonic.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Linux app shared memory problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:52:15 -0000 On 08/12/12 11:12, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > Trying to run a Linux app under 9-STABLE. I can start it once and stop > it once but all subsequent efforts produces a core dump. > > I believe the reason being that this app stores licensing information in > shared memory and when it stops first time it fails to remove this info. > > Is there a sysctl parameter that would be useful in a case like this? > Additional info: linux_set_robust_list(0x2820c710,0xc,0x2808fff4,0x2820c6c0,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_sys_futex(0xffffcc90,0x81,0x1,0x2820c6c0,0x2808fff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x20,0xffffc948,0x0,0x8,0x2808fff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x21,0xffffc948,0x0,0x8,0x2808fff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x1,0xffffcbfc,0x0,0x8,0x2808fff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_getrlimit(0x3,0xffffcc84,0x28207ff4,0x10,0x1,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_newuname(0xffffc9f8,0x2820b400,0x2808fff4,0x0,0xffffc9f8,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_ipc(0x17,0x4f524553,0x10000,0x3ff,0x0,0x6) = 65536 (0x10000) linux_ipc(0x15,0x10000,0x0,0xffffcbe8,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_ipc(0x2,0x4f726583,0x1,0x1ff,0x0,0x6) ERR#13 'Permission denied' linux_ipc(0x3,0xffffffff,0x0,0x10c,0xffffca68,0x6) ERR#22 'Invalid argument' linux_rt_sigaction(0xe,0xffffc9c8,0x0,0x8,0x2808fff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_alarm(0x14,0x0,0x80589d8,0xffffcb10,0xffffcb94,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_ipc(0x1,0xffffffff,0x1,0x0,0xffffcba0,0x6) ERR#22 'Invalid argument' linux_rt_sigaction(0xe,0xffffc9c8,0x0,0x8,0x2808fff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_alarm(0x0,0x0,0x80589d8,0xffffffff,0xffffcba0,0x6) = 20 (0x14) linux_ipc(0x3,0xffffffff,0x0,0x10c,0xffffca88,0x6) ERR#22 'Invalid argument' linux_rt_sigaction(0xe,0xffffc9e8,0x0,0x8,0x2808fff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_alarm(0x14,0x0,0x80589d8,0xffffcb30,0xffffcbb4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_ipc(0x1,0xffffffff,0x1,0x0,0xffffcbc0,0x6) ERR#22 'Invalid argument' linux_rt_sigaction(0xe,0xffffc9e8,0x0,0x8,0x2808fff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_alarm(0x0,0x0,0x80589d8,0xffffffff,0xffffcbc0,0x6) = 20 (0x14) linux_fstat64(0x1,0xffffcaf4,0x28207ff4,0x282084c0,0x282084c0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0x6) = 671576064 (0x28077000) Shared memory problem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 10:29:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05648106564A for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 10:29:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.t@mail.com) Received: from mailout-us.mail.com (mailout-us.mail.com [74.208.122.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B008F8FC0C for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 10:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2012 10:29:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO blazon-pc.runningwild.local) [78.84.105.231] by mail.gmx.com (mp-us009) with SMTP; 12 Aug 2012 06:29:19 -0400 X-Authenticated: #76218138 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18B+Korqs4BCGRHtVSIlvQ/kd7+i0W9IF3WOYOAMi Y1hirKOWvYUG8m Message-ID: <5027857C.2050500@mail.com> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:29:16 +0300 From: Jeff Tipton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <50234C4C.7040809@mail.com> <20120809055018.GG25781@kontrol.kode5.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: mac powerpc ibook g3 blank screen on start up X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 10:29:21 -0000 On 08/12/2012 07:00, Andy Recker wrote: > thanks for the help but there is no CD icon there is no anything to click > on my computer is very unresponsive let e know if u have any other ideas? > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: > >> == Jeff Tipton wrote on Thu 9.Aug'12 at 8:36:12 +0300 == >> >>> On 08/09/2012 06:22, Andy Recker wrote: >>>> i installed the power PC version of free BSD and put it on my mac i >> book g3 >>>> i was in the insulation process when i couldn't get it to work because >> of a >>>> few errors and i decided to turn it off and restart when i turned it >> back >>>> on it only booted to a blank white screen it has nothing on it and >> nothing >>>> is responsive i have tried to reboot the same CD i had the first thing >> and >>>> still just a blank screen what can i do to get BSD to work on my >> computer? >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> When you are trying to reboot into the installation CD, are you sure >>> you have the right boot sequence selected (CD, not HDD)? I guess on >>> your mac it might mean restarting, holding down the option key, >>> choosing the CD icon and the arrow on the right side. >>> >>> -Jeff >> Yes, it's either the 'option' key or the 'C' key; can' recall which. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Try to understand what's going on. You were installing FreeBSD on your harddisk, interrupted the process somewhere in the middle because you had errors, restarted and booted from that harddisk (right?) with half-installed operating system, and now you have a blank screen, which is no wonder. If your hardware isn't damaged per se (hopefully), then you may try once more to boot from the FreeBSD installation CD instead of harddisk, and you need to find a way how to do that. Of cource, your blank screen doesn't have any icons to click or command line prompts. The boot choice should be done at the first moments of your computer startup. If the boot menu is gone, you may still try to enter Open Firmware and type your boot command from there (see, for example, http://mac.linux.be/content/booting-open-firmware). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 10:41:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5686D106564A for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 10:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kuku@kukulies.org) Received: from kukulies.org (mail.kukulies.org [78.47.239.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F128FC08 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 10:41:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kukulies.org (Postfix, from userid 5001) id D1EF51AD860; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:41:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on kukulies.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.2.103] (p4FD5E7A3.dip.t-dialin.net [79.213.231.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kukulies.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B28271AD85F for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:41:04 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5027883E.4000305@kukulies.org> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:41:02 +0200 From: "Christoph P.U. Kukulies" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120810120045.C92A91065691@hub.freebsd.org> <20120811171652.I93465@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <20120811171652.I93465@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: weird problem with 9.0 Release and ed0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 10:41:07 -0000 Am 11.08.2012 09:58, schrieb Ian Smith: > In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 427, Issue 6, Message: 16 > On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:39:36 +0200 "Christoph P.U. Kukulies" wrote: > > Am 10.08.2012 11:40, schrieb Christoph P.U. Kukulies: > > > Am 10.08.2012 11:28, schrieb Christoph P.U. Kukulies: > > >> The problem need not to be confined to 9.0. It stated to develop > > >> under 5.1 already. > > > read: started to develop... > > >> > > >> I'm running a natd gateway machine that was developing strange > > >> behaviour such that the > > >> outside interface (ed0, BNC connector) that was connected via a small > > >> media converter switch to > > >> the providers sync line had dropouts. The machine couldn't ping into > > >> the Internet and also couldn't be pinged. > > >> > > >> I first thought it was the switch/media converter, but another > > >> (Windows XP) machine that was on the > > >> same BNC cable worked flawlessly. > > That XP box was directly on the outside, not inside nat'd via this one? Yes, on the same BNC cable/interface. --+------------+--80.72.44.x----+---[SWITCH/BNCtoTP]-----INTERNET------ | | | 80.72.44.228 80.72.44.226 | ed0 | ed0 FreeBSD 5.1 XP Box FreeBSD 9.0 xl0 em0 | | --+-----172.27.x.x------------+----Intranet------------ > > > > >> So I decided to migrate that 5.1 machine to a 9.0 machine. The > > >> situation now is that I have the9.0 machine > > >> at the BNC cable and simultanously the old FreeBSD 5.1 gateway on the > > >> same BNC cable but through a > > >> TP adapter. This was the old machine works fine and I can care about > > >> the new machine. > > Not quite clear .. can you sketch your network configuration? Hope the ascii art doesn't get garbled. > > > >> Is there a known problem with ed0 cards that have the Realtek 8029 > > >> chipset. Do they need some > > >> special flags like memory mapping or irq? > > Long time since I've run anything with 10base2/BNC, but it used to work > ok, on an ed0. > > > >> When I for example boot the 9.0 machine the comping up of the em0 (on > > >> mainboard interface results in a highlighted > > >> kernel message on the console. The coming up of the ed0 is not > > >> flagged this way. And as a result the > > >> ed0 interface seems to be dead. > > Does the outside interface have a static address, or do you use DHCP > via the provider's switch/hub/whatever? Show /etc/rc.conf setup. It > smells a bit like the interface may not be up soon enough at that time; > the ntpd message below could also indicate something like that re ipv6. No DHCP in the game. Everything static. > > > >> Here some excerpts of dmesg: > > >> em0: port 0x4400-0x441f > > >> mem 0x93100000-0x9311ffff,0x93124000-0x93124fff irq 20 at device 25.0 > > >> on pci0 > > >> em0: Using an MSI interrupt > > >> em0: Ethernet address: 00:1c:c0:37:b2:9f > > >> > > >> ed0: port 0x1000-0x101f irq 22 at device 1.0 on pci7 > > >> ed0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:7d:7c:2b:4a > > >> > > >> I also see this: > > >> Jul 30 23:03:54 forum ntpd[1711]: unable to create socket on ed0 (20) > > >> for fe80:: > > >> 2e0:7dff:fe7c:2b4a#123 > > You should get more / better clues if you boot with verbose messages. > > > > Forgot to add this info: > > > > > > ed0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > > > ether 00:e0:7d:7c:2b:4a > > > inet 80.72.44.230 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 80.72.44.239 > > > inet6 fe80::2e0:7dff:fe7c:2b4a%ed0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xa > > > nd6 options=29 > > > media: Ethernet autoselect (10base2/BNC) > > > > > > > Must add some more info: > > > > My kernel config: > > > > cpu I486_CPU > > cpu I586_CPU > > cpu I686_CPU > > ident DIVERT > > > > makeoptions DEBUG=-g # Build kernel with gdb(1) debug > > symbols > > options IPFIREWALL > > options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE > > options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=10 > > options IPDIVERT > > options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT > > > > (the rest like in GENERIC). > > Just to mention: you don't actually need to include FIREWALL* or DIVERT > in kernels these days; a GENERIC kernel will work fine, loading modules > as needed. Only exception is if you needed FIREWALL_FORWARD, which it > appears you don't. Ah, that's good to know. > > > > Strange thing: > > > > I cannot ping neither the outside interface address nor the inside > > (172.27.2.115) forum2# egrep 'ifconfig|firewall|natd|gateway|ntpd' /etc/rc.conf ### Basic network and firewall/security options: ### ifconfig_em0=" inet 172.27.2.115 netmask 255.255.0.0" ifconfig_lo0="inet 127.0.0.1" # default loopback device configuration. ifconfig_ed0="inet 87.79.34.230 netmask 0xfffffff0 " ntpd_enable="NO" natd_enable="YES" # Enable natd (if firewall_enable == YES). natd_program="/sbin/natd" # path to natd, if you want a different one. natd_interface="ed0" # Public interface or IPaddress to use. natd_flags="" # Additional flags for natd. firewall_enable="YES" # Set to YES to enable firewall functionality firewall_script="/etc/rc.firewall" # Which script to run to set up the firewall firewall_type="simple" # Firewall type (see /etc/rc.firewall) firewall_quiet="NO" # Set to YES to suppress rule display firewall_logging="YES" # Set to YES to enable events logging gateway_enable="YES" /etc/natd.conf isn't there. but natd is running as /sbin/natd -n ed0 00100 332 117666 allow ip from any to any via lo0 00200 0 0 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 00300 0 0 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 00400 58395 6512836 allow ip from any to any via em0 00500 0 0 deny ip from 172.27.0.0/16 to any in via ed0 00600 0 0 deny ip from 80.72.44.0/28 to any in via em0 00700 0 0 deny tcp from any to 80.72.44.230 dst-port 3306 00800 0 0 deny tcp from any to 80.72.44.230 dst-port 515 00900 0 0 deny tcp from any to 80.72.44.230 dst-port 139 01000 0 0 allow tcp from 80.72.44.227 to 80.72.44.230 dst-port 139 01100 0 0 allow tcp from 80.72.44.227 to 80.72.44.230 dst-port 137 01200 0 0 allow udp from 80.72.44.227 to 80.72.44.230 dst-port 137 01300 0 0 allow udp from 80.72.44.227 to 80.72.44.230 dst-port 138 01400 0 0 deny tcp from any to 172.27.2.115 dst-port 3306 01500 0 0 deny tcp from any to 172.27.2.115 dst-port 515 01600 0 0 deny tcp from any to 172.27.2.115 dst-port 139 01700 0 0 allow tcp from 80.72.44.227 to 172.27.2.115 dst-port 139 01800 0 0 allow tcp from 80.72.44.227 to 172.27.2.115 dst-port 137 01900 0 0 allow udp from 80.72.44.227 to 172.27.2.115 dst-port 137 02000 0 0 allow udp from 80.72.44.227 to 172.27.2.115 dst-port 138 02100 0 0 deny tcp from any to 80.72.44.230 dst-port 587 02200 0 0 deny tcp from any to 80.72.44.230 dst-port 6000 02300 0 0 deny tcp from any to 80.72.44.230 dst-port 6000 02400 0 0 deny ip from any to 10.0.0.0/8 via ed0 02500 0 0 deny ip from any to 172.16.0.0/12 via ed0 02600 0 0 deny ip from any to 192.168.0.0/16 via ed0 02700 0 0 deny ip from any to 0.0.0.0/8 via ed0 02800 0 0 deny ip from any to 169.254.0.0/16 via ed0 02900 0 0 deny ip from any to 192.0.2.0/24 via ed0 03000 6 306 deny ip from any to 224.0.0.0/4 via ed0 03100 0 0 deny ip from any to 240.0.0.0/4 via ed0 03200 5082 354910 divert 8668 ip from any to any via ed0 03300 0 0 allow tcp from any to any established 03400 0 0 allow ip from any to any frag 03500 0 0 allow tcp from 80.72.44.227 to 80.72.44.230 dst-port 25 setup 03600 3720 240576 allow udp from 80.72.44.230 to any dst-port 53 keep-state 03700 0 0 allow udp from 80.72.44.230 to any dst-port 123 keep-state 03800 0 0 allow tcp from 80.72.44.227 to 80.72.44.230 dst-port 80 setup 03900 0 0 allow tcp from 199.99.9.163 to 80.72.44.230 dst-port 80 setup 04000 0 0 allow tcp from 199.99.9.247 to 80.72.44.230 dst-port 80 setup 04100 0 0 allow tcp from 80.72.44.227 to 80.72.44.230 dst-port 22 setup 04200 0 0 allow tcp from 199.99.9.163 to 80.72.44.230 dst-port 22 setup 04300 0 0 allow tcp from 199.99.9.247 to 80.72.44.230 dst-port 22 setup 04400 0 0 allow tcp from any to 172.27.2.115 04500 0 0 deny log logamount 5 tcp from any to any in via ed0 setup 04600 0 0 allow tcp from any to any setup 65535 1367 114702 allow ip from any to any # netstat -finet -rn forum2# netstat -finet -rn Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 80.72.44.225 UGS 0 7440 ed0 80.72.44.224/28 link#10 U 0 2700 ed0 80.72.44.230 link#10 UHS 0 4 lo0 127.0.0.1 link#12 UH 0 160 lo0 172.27.0.0/16 link#1 U 0 722 em0 172.27.2.115 link#1 UHS 0 2 lo0 forum2# This is the information so far. Pinging the interfaces with their respective addresses works now. What doesn't work is the pinging of the neighbour machine (XP) 80.72.44.226 which I can ping from the FreeBSD 5.1 neighbour machine. I still can imagine that there is a hardware problem that leads tp packet corruption or something. I will exchange the media converter/switch next. Thanks a lot. -- Christoph > > > > > -- > > Christoph Kukulies > > Please show output from: > > # egrep 'ifconfig|firewall|natd|gateway|ntpd' /etc/rc.conf > # cat /etc/natd.conf > # ipfw show > # netstat -finet -rn > > cheers, Ian > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 12:40:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24541106566B for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:40:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C668FC12 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.199.104]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 12 Aug 2012 05:40:56 -0700 Message-ID: <5027A459.8060809@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:40:57 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1344347348.23440.5.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> <5022715C.9010301@a1poweruser.com> <50250034.8010004@a1poweruser.com> <20120810135446.GA48662@ei.bzerk.org> <50251DE5.3010106@a1poweruser.com> <50266F8F.4010504@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Aug 2012 12:40:56.0151 (UTC) FILETIME=[B7B34670:01CD7887] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, blackfriar Subject: Re: NFS within a Jail?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:40:55 -0000 http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=29968&highlight=nfsd Found this which I think says it all at the conclusion. March 30th, 2012 Received some information from the FreeBSD mailing list and apparently exporting NFS from an jailed environment is not possible. For those who have "managed" (by heavy tweaking of sysctl.conf) to export the NFS probably have these concerns: 1) Security may have been compromised on their own jails as a result of tweaks and 2) Even if you manage to export the NFS share under such strained boundary conditions, it may cause problems in some of the application's you would like to use (eg: tinderbox) finally, 3) If you try to use net/unfs3 and succeed to export NFS, this will not have a very fast (ro) transport rate and will have many (rw) speed limitations. My personal conclusion is to wait until the default kernel version of nfs is updated to be jail-friendly before I try using nfs in jails. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 12:53:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6911065675 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:53:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from blackfriar@inhio.eu) Received: from cz-prg-mx-01.inhio.eu (mail.inhio.eu [178.238.36.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1898FC0A for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:53:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.59] (blackfriar.inhio.eu [10.0.0.59]) by cz-prg-mx-01.inhio.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C66C61075F8; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 14:53:32 +0200 (CEST) From: blackfriar To: Fbsd8 In-Reply-To: <5027A459.8060809@a1poweruser.com> References: <1344347348.23440.5.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> <5022715C.9010301@a1poweruser.com> <50250034.8010004@a1poweruser.com> <20120810135446.GA48662@ei.bzerk.org> <50251DE5.3010106@a1poweruser.com> <50266F8F.4010504@a1poweruser.com> <5027A459.8060809@a1poweruser.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-MVyGIia1jFbbXGyDa0/T" Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 14:53:32 +0200 Message-ID: <1344776012.1963.19.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl, mail25@bzerk.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS within a Jail?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:53:42 -0000 --=-MVyGIia1jFbbXGyDa0/T Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well, yes. That was my immediate decision. Just to find an alternative/temporary way and to wait for something more reliable and standard. I don't really have the critical need to proceed with such a setup right now and it's good to know a little bit more about the status of such a feature and what others think and tried/managed to do about it. I really wanna thank you all for your valuable inputs. Have a good rest of the weekend. On Sun, 2012-08-12 at 08:40 -0400, Fbsd8 wrote: > http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D29968&highlight=3Dnfsd >=20 > Found this which I think says it all at the conclusion. >=20 > March 30th, 2012 > Received some information from the FreeBSD mailing list and apparently= =20 > exporting NFS from an jailed environment is not possible. For those who= =20 > have "managed" (by heavy tweaking of sysctl.conf) to export the NFS=20 > probably have these concerns: 1) Security may have been compromised on= =20 > their own jails as a result of tweaks and 2) Even if you manage to=20 > export the NFS share under such strained boundary conditions, it may=20 > cause problems in some of the application's you would like to use (eg:= =20 > tinderbox) finally, 3) If you try to use net/unfs3 and succeed to export= =20 > NFS, this will not have a very fast (ro) transport rate and will have=20 > many (rw) speed limitations. >=20 >=20 > My personal conclusion is to wait until the default kernel version of=20 > nfs is updated to be jail-friendly before I try using nfs in jails. --=-MVyGIia1jFbbXGyDa0/T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAABCgAGBQJQJ6dLAAoJEHh31FxK1ARqnIgP/20HumHWED+d4ZuDt+IktLyw aKjbH6C4SW/HZa0PV8xIghMffjPznBu8WAlrAaL14C27f360Q+szYdBA6lLeUipB DVpyamMgDeU1b41mnisP+jP/BUt+b41bEajJsPMJAnrSfE0nU75xXg/m9TvtngFS FJiS7t6AgsMq8/GxjRuGj/51LANJQ6BBxrJVZMh0iLvYuIxVtjDzQQglQWA3DaGF Q/VFKHffhGhivrPcpJSGwl6domjQ5z7hhBGYb/JxnoUSzId6YbihwQzSZecDbL4m Zf2xaUuoDXBLRj+l8xfrxCsSfV1inAd+lxZDIcJyLKnb1BdY3cp6CHlxnVM+9hcr PYOuhUj3+vcCMswGAleamKgf34GtSU5fKLQCs3I5t+EJJ75f8DClQRrbUMdylLma 5QmqX6Gb7C/EktqSjlJ5B2RT3d3aVFAOXOkjqqh1gpWoTHpcyE8NKx5R2YWKrHw8 UOj0GNOpQjaeoOI2r8oExKFtkYx3h4/1rsCtIh8d3aPstwyE+Ma7Pf1XWCJHaPDV olzCN9S/DJ9rBsnSotGBdZmmiYda4D0ZypYXN3yBfmaGL0lL7OjQUH022bnr7Aif ARqsvxzdhxnhDcEBcaLzy7QEuaKyja4/CCUYmSAw8+B4M+yCkvZ9XkCCkmg82nXn kt9yBLeUy3rQSKoHSB9B =pHwp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-MVyGIia1jFbbXGyDa0/T-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 15:45:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04611065672 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:45:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4458FC0A for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7CFjJhi089831; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 17:45:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q7CFjJ2e089828; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 17:45:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 17:45:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Fbsd8 In-Reply-To: <5027A459.8060809@a1poweruser.com> Message-ID: References: <1344347348.23440.5.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> <5022715C.9010301@a1poweruser.com> <50250034.8010004@a1poweruser.com> <20120810135446.GA48662@ei.bzerk.org> <50251DE5.3010106@a1poweruser.com> <50266F8F.4010504@a1poweruser.com> <5027A459.8060809@a1poweruser.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 12 Aug 2012 17:45:20 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, blackfriar Subject: Re: NFS within a Jail?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:45:32 -0000 > http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=29968&highlight=nfsd > > Found this which I think says it all at the conclusion. > you are truly funny. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 16:34:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43767106566B for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 16:34:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arab@tangerine-army.co.uk) Received: from mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB148FC0A for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 16:34:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from know-smtpout-1.server.virginmedia.net ([62.254.123.4]) by mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20120812163444.IZID28961.mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@know-smtpout-1.server.virginmedia.net> for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 17:34:44 +0100 Received: from [94.168.171.147] (helo=MERCURY.universe.galaxy.lcl) by know-smtpout-1.server.virginmedia.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1T0b6x-0000WH-Mr for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 17:33:55 +0100 Received: from MERCURY.universe.galaxy.lcl ([::1]) by MERCURY.universe.galaxy.lcl ([::1]) with mapi; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 17:33:53 +0100 From: Graeme Dargie To: customer Thread-Topic: Hi! Thread-Index: AQHNeFwV8E5hIPAJFE6Oh0roVXvIsJdWX7dQ Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 16:33:52 +0000 Message-ID: <14980AB869AD6B47A8803DB297CD219207682461@MERCURY.universe.galaxy.lcl> References: <3R88YYJ8.2460U3I@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <3R88YYJ8.2460U3I@yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=GaEGOwq9FwezmTggA+b6yC6zDZF2HYaK6RN/tSqdnVA= c=1 sm=0 a=OMdUhd4NiskA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=j1sJEYAiAAAA:8 a=GDEAIdnjB3c7yWy6dyMA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=XQZPik2mF1gA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Subject: RE: Hi! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 16:34:53 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@f= reebsd.org] On Behalf Of Gordon Cox Sent: 12 August 2012 07:31 To: customer Subject: Hi! Hello customer, =20 You don't have to reply, this is a test. I have a new website someurl.com You are welcome! _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman= /listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " Well at least his surname is appropriate! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 19:25:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA81C106564A for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 19:25:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web.webmaster20@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A148FC15 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 19:25:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so6366125pbb.13 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:25:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=utfaaDRtMsoK27gUIPvOtfqdJePun9pVPeV97sRMqgo=; b=lxkeFTd0TrSgO8jEGyrvsmCiaTKs8rouQBQxAIEcXkEiP8603Mm1mpVVu+j04gpPjJ jagRMvaDQWOdwQMK0/W7kfBAWP+ooaymeecl8pP3YGHaUdP6/PeH2iSHxCdSwfUSo2N3 uRkMA2vN+SZiroQzPr38iT6TVv5FLJeKlq/vl4LiGaNFO/r/D6vr0ycSVzVZ+xLB7S88 AbcMZ7oTcxyg/0Nifxtyp0lDcYss1Ix73IcCRY70ZneDJHirC/vXJxhSmrJfbwu9ZD/d WqLJg11LWdV+CuueC6xwYTCdcoOYCv6285QIeqo3PNHIjlhaDcXwYvUPuKjbNZ+O+cWh +Sxw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.237.41 with SMTP id uz9mr8348270pbc.120.1344799508747; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:25:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.46.5 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:25:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 22:55:08 +0330 Message-ID: From: Web webmaster To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: shiaha.com@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 19:25:09 -0000 hi Direct Admin and enter the desired installation package gives error Command:pkg_add -r gmake perl Error: Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-7.4-release/Latest/gmake.tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) pkg_add: unable to fetch ' ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-7.4-release/Latest/gmake.tbz' by URL Broken pipe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 20:21:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2F41065672; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:21:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pki2.com) Received: from btw.pki2.com (btw.pki2.com [IPv6:2001:470:a:6fd::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854288FC15; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by btw.pki2.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7CKLYxY016227; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:21:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@pki2.com) From: Dennis Glatting To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-bDR9TQ1UOFjVqakdzPaO" Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:21:34 -0700 Message-ID: <1344802894.5402.11.camel@btw.pki2.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Dennis Glatting X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: q7CKLYxY016227 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: freebsd@pki2.com X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Panic 9 .1-PRERELEASE on HP Servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:21:43 -0000 --=-bDR9TQ1UOFjVqakdzPaO Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have a number of HP servers and on two of them (so far) I am getting similar panics on every reboot. I've enclosed a screen shot of one of the panics. A common denominator, so far, is both are compiled using the 4.2+ C compiler and both are CVSUP mirrors. My other HP machines have not yet shown the same problem on reboot. Other data: Granny# uname -a FreeBSD Granny 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #35: Sun Aug 12 13:08:52 MDT 2012 root@Granny:/sys/amd64/compile/PENFORD-amd64 amd64 Granny# tunefs -p /dev/da0p3 tunefs: POSIX.1e ACLs: (-a) disabled tunefs: NFSv4 ACLs: (-N) disabled tunefs: MAC multilabel: (-l) disabled tunefs: soft updates: (-n) enabled tunefs: soft update journaling: (-j) enabled tunefs: gjournal: (-J) disabled tunefs: trim: (-t) disabled tunefs: maximum blocks per file in a cylinder group: (-e) 4096 tunefs: average file size: (-f) 16384 tunefs: average number of files in a directory: (-s) 64 tunefs: minimum percentage of free space: (-m) 8% tunefs: optimization preference: (-o) time tunefs: volume label: (-L) --=-bDR9TQ1UOFjVqakdzPaO-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 20:27:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9552E106564A; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dg17@penx.com) Received: from btw.pki2.com (btw.pki2.com [IPv6:2001:470:a:6fd::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433CC8FC08; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by btw.pki2.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7CKR403018076; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:27:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dg17@penx.com) From: Dennis Glatting To: Dennis Glatting In-Reply-To: <1344802894.5402.11.camel@btw.pki2.com> References: <1344802894.5402.11.camel@btw.pki2.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:27:04 -0700 Message-ID: <1344803224.5537.8.camel@btw.pki2.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Dennis Glatting X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: q7CKR403018076 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: dg17@penx.com Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic 9 .1-PRERELEASE on HP Servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dg17@penx.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:27:08 -0000 Looks like my screen shot was stripped. You can find it here: http://www.pki2.com/hp.JPG Also: Granny> cc -v Using built-in specs. Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD] On Sun, 2012-08-12 at 13:21 -0700, Dennis Glatting wrote: > I have a number of HP servers and on two of them (so far) I am getting > similar panics on every reboot. I've enclosed a screen shot of one of > the panics. > > A common denominator, so far, is both are compiled using the 4.2+ C > compiler and both are CVSUP mirrors. My other HP machines have not yet > shown the same problem on reboot. > > > Other data: > > > Granny# uname -a > FreeBSD Granny 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #35: Sun Aug 12 > 13:08:52 MDT 2012 root@Granny:/sys/amd64/compile/PENFORD-amd64 > amd64 > > > Granny# tunefs -p /dev/da0p3 > tunefs: POSIX.1e ACLs: (-a) disabled > tunefs: NFSv4 ACLs: (-N) disabled > tunefs: MAC multilabel: (-l) disabled > tunefs: soft updates: (-n) enabled > tunefs: soft update journaling: (-j) enabled > tunefs: gjournal: (-J) disabled > tunefs: trim: (-t) disabled > tunefs: maximum blocks per file in a cylinder group: (-e) 4096 > tunefs: average file size: (-f) 16384 > tunefs: average number of files in a directory: (-s) 64 > tunefs: minimum percentage of free space: (-m) 8% > tunefs: optimization preference: (-o) time > tunefs: volume label: (-L) > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 20:30:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6240A1065673; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:30:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@penx.com) Received: from btw.pki2.com (btw.pki2.com [IPv6:2001:470:a:6fd::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B8E8FC16; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:30:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by btw.pki2.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7CKTwos018173; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:29:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@penx.com) From: Dennis Glatting To: Dennis Glatting In-Reply-To: <1344802894.5402.11.camel@btw.pki2.com> References: <1344802894.5402.11.camel@btw.pki2.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:29:58 -0700 Message-ID: <1344803398.5537.9.camel@btw.pki2.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Dennis Glatting X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: q7CKTwos018173 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: freebsd@penx.com Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic 9 .1-PRERELEASE on HP Servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:30:04 -0000 Looks like my screen shot was stripped. You can find it here: http://www.pki2.com/hp.JPG Also: Granny> cc -v Using built-in specs. Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD] On Sun, 2012-08-12 at 13:21 -0700, Dennis Glatting wrote: > I have a number of HP servers and on two of them (so far) I am getting > similar panics on every reboot. I've enclosed a screen shot of one of > the panics. > > A common denominator, so far, is both are compiled using the 4.2+ C > compiler and both are CVSUP mirrors. My other HP machines have not yet > shown the same problem on reboot. > > > Other data: > > > Granny# uname -a > FreeBSD Granny 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #35: Sun Aug 12 > 13:08:52 MDT 2012 root@Granny:/sys/amd64/compile/PENFORD-amd64 > amd64 > > > Granny# tunefs -p /dev/da0p3 > tunefs: POSIX.1e ACLs: (-a) disabled > tunefs: NFSv4 ACLs: (-N) disabled > tunefs: MAC multilabel: (-l) disabled > tunefs: soft updates: (-n) enabled > tunefs: soft update journaling: (-j) enabled > tunefs: gjournal: (-J) disabled > tunefs: trim: (-t) disabled > tunefs: maximum blocks per file in a cylinder group: (-e) 4096 > tunefs: average file size: (-f) 16384 > tunefs: average number of files in a directory: (-s) 64 > tunefs: minimum percentage of free space: (-m) 8% > tunefs: optimization preference: (-o) time > tunefs: volume label: (-L) > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 20:45:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9F71065740; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:45:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D8D8FC0C; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so7813595obb.13 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:45:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ptjlofal8XQMgoFrn2N5KqO+8O2vCcYPeRrNcUSC0rM=; b=PGOOPvwclmzcJFPbQTsTXo5zFuZJAo9ou5NdRSc7+0gEscyLdUQwpgwtRUFaes+GJQ 3rDUGAIa0sQa0LRcA9DQemkQh5IvBSVOs27bHSY2PZPoX6WOESpZ63twnJPCAIXQIY4e c0ulKFQLWOGWOh6i/jYcfZGcDOIKStvB55b4057yGg/f5wcfTUu83EDi2oTOtaIyj5HO RYHLTwQ2wi+2sB0x0Vyaayz8EYWctftSJTxD4PnIC+ulfBLzOQq4kD3AR6RzPJRGWpIa 7uHty10MGTtRu+vUNazpt5TJa3AnNIv03ksO4jRiwQDEDTDGdEUG5kU8z5nfUVlfqn8/ TLnQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.31.102 with SMTP id z6mr1590622oeh.42.1344803868524; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:37:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.142.201 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:37:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1344803398.5537.9.camel@btw.pki2.com> References: <1344802894.5402.11.camel@btw.pki2.com> <1344803398.5537.9.camel@btw.pki2.com> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:37:48 -0700 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: Dennis Glatting Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Dennis Glatting , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic 9 .1-PRERELEASE on HP Servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:45:12 -0000 On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Dennis Glatting wrote: > Looks like my screen shot was stripped. You can find it here: > > http://www.pki2.com/hp.JPG > > > Also: > > Granny> cc -v > Using built-in specs. > Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd > Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler > Thread model: posix > gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD] What was the actual panic message/assert that was hit? Thanks, -Garrett PS Please don't cross-post. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 02:50:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4955E106566B for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 02:50:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED928FC08 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 02:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from WildRover.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2] (may be forged)) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA08187 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:50:47 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <201208130250.UAA08187@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:50:43 -0600 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: How to keep freebsd-update from trashing custom kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 02:50:58 -0000 Everyone: Just ran freebsd-update (fetch, then install) on a system on which I run a customized kernel, and discovered that it has overwritten my custom kernel... even though I'd copied the original to /boot/GENERIC when I first installed the system. I was under the impression that creating /boot/GENERIC, and putting the GENERIC kernel in it, would cause freebsd-update to update that directory rather than one's custom kernel. I now must rebuild the kernel to keep the machine working. What went wrong, and how do stop it from recurring? --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 05:36:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35331065673 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:36:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB248FC15 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34425 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2012 05:36:43 -0000 Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 13 Aug 2012 05:36:43 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=5028926b.xn--3zv.k1208; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=OmjhxF9FKLhxjaSCGXsvkdTcz55oRH4Uso1bFNCo3Ck=; b=Ae6fp79oxPxyAkv8IZf4k85/9oivy7Lk5af306OuByVeQzOALZjTd2BhlDO+t8OG9s2XWo52V8kkpvhM3AlrZqQo392nyL3ene9d59hoalwnFRa1FqncoszbYDiY/P9UI+XIvL370yuq4YGKQP26f/gJnZd1tpUs1elX48DQ/5s= VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org Date: 13 Aug 2012 05:36:21 -0000 Message-ID: <20120813053621.24629.qmail@joyce.lan> From: "John Levine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Firefox 13.0.1.1 won't build under 8.3 on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:36:44 -0000 I'm reasonably sure I have the png and sqlite3 libraries built as needed, but the build still barfs when compiling the SSL function nsNSSErrors.cpp. The end of the build log is copied below. I don't have the logs handy, but Thunderbird fails the same way. Any suggestions? R's, John c++ -o nsNSSErrors.o -c -I../../../../dist/stl_wrappers -I../../../../dist/system_wrappers -include ../../../.././../config/gcc_hidden.h -DNSS_ENABLE_ECC -DDLL_PREFIX=\"lib\" -DDLL_SUFFIX=\".so\" -DMOZ_GLUE_IN_PROGRAM -DXPCOM_TRANSLATE_NSGM_ENTRY_POINT=1 -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -D_IMPL_NS_COM -DEXPORT_XPT_API -DEXPORT_XPTC_API -D_IMPL_NS_GFX -D_IMPL_NS_WIDGET -DIMPL_XREAPI -DIMPL_NS_NET -DIMPL_THEBES -DSTATIC_EXPORTABLE_JS_API -DOSTYPE=\"FreeBSD8\" -DOSARCH=FreeBSD -I/usr/local/include/nss -I../../../.././../security/manager/ssl/src -I. -I../../../../dist/include -I../../../../dist/include/nsprpub -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/nspr -I/usr/local/include/nss -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -fPIC -I/usr/local/include/nss -I/usr/local/include/nss/nss -I/usr/local/include -fno-rtti -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Woverloaded-virtual -Werror=return-type -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-overlength-strings -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wno-variadic-macros -Wcast-align -O2 -pipe -f no-strict-aliasing -fno-exceptions -fno-strict-aliasing -fshort-wchar -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -I/usr/local/include/nss -I/usr/local/include/nss/nss -I/usr/local/include -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include ../../../../mozilla-config.h /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/security/manager/ssl/src/nsNSSErrors.cpp /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/security/manager/ssl/src/nsNSSComponent.cpp: In member function 'virtual nsresult nsCryptoHash::Finish(bool, nsACString_internal&)': /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/security/manager/ssl/src/nsNSSComponent.cpp:2879: error: 'BTOA_DataToAscii' was not declared in this scope /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/security/manager/ssl/src/nsNSSComponent.cpp: In member function 'virtual nsresult nsCryptoHMAC::Finish(bool, nsACString_internal&)': /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/security/manager/ssl/src/nsNSSComponent.cpp:3070: error: 'BTOA_DataToAscii' was not declared in this scope gmake[5]: *** [nsNSSComponent.o] Error 1 gmake[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... gmake[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.3/security/manager/ssl/src' gmake[4]: *** [libs] Error 2 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.3/security/manager/ssl' gmake[3]: *** [libs] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.3/security/manager' gmake[2]: *** [libs_tier_platform] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.3' gmake[1]: *** [tier_platform] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.3' gmake: *** [default] Error 2 *** Error code 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 05:42:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8B4106566C for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673D28FC08 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:42:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35769 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2012 05:42:14 -0000 Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 13 Aug 2012 05:42:14 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=502893b6.xn--9vv.k1208; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=7JklJUjSZ8OPsH8Uq5Q/Q2RF/3kCYJ7u0x3OGFqYjOQ=; b=Uspoa8x0obT1R7aM21F++86armB91GNnXJ5LjmLFlprMsw4EwDFsNQDYOutACDp5CUWYWws6Ndb0bwcoNHzFz26zfHKtU75WrdMf39QG8b290kj6mTPu82ZfXMHxCsuX0d7SlT+p0x+v+RECoqFUxX5A/SQnMEH1em/g/AbLAY4= VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org Date: 13 Aug 2012 05:41:52 -0000 Message-ID: <20120813054152.26495.qmail@joyce.lan> From: "John Levine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20120813053621.24629.qmail@joyce.lan> Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Firefox 14.0.1 won't build under 8.3 on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:42:16 -0000 Oops, it's 14.0.1 I'm trying to build. 13.0.0.1 is what I have installed now. In article <20120813053621.24629.qmail@joyce.lan> you write: >I'm reasonably sure I have the png and sqlite3 libraries built as >needed, but the build still barfs when compiling the SSL function >nsNSSErrors.cpp. The end of the build log is copied below. > >I don't have the logs handy, but Thunderbird fails the same way. Any >suggestions? > >R's, >John > > >c++ -o nsNSSErrors.o -c -I../../../../dist/stl_wrappers -I../../../../dist/system_wrappers >-include ../../../.././../config/gcc_hidden.h -DNSS_ENABLE_ECC -DDLL_PREFIX=\"lib\" >-DDLL_SUFFIX=\".so\" -DMOZ_GLUE_IN_PROGRAM -DXPCOM_TRANSLATE_NSGM_ENTRY_POINT=1 >-DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -D_IMPL_NS_COM -DEXPORT_XPT_API -DEXPORT_XPTC_API -D_IMPL_NS_GFX >-D_IMPL_NS_WIDGET -DIMPL_XREAPI -DIMPL_NS_NET -DIMPL_THEBES -DSTATIC_EXPORTABLE_JS_API >-DOSTYPE=\"FreeBSD8\" -DOSARCH=FreeBSD -I/usr/local/include/nss -I.. >+ /../../.././../security/manager/ssl/src -I. -I../../../../dist/include >-I../../../../dist/include/nsprpub -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/nspr >-I/usr/local/include/nss -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -fPIC >-I/usr/local/include/nss -I/usr/local/include/nss/nss -I/usr/local/include -fno-rtti -Wall >-Wpointer-arith -Woverloaded-virtual -Werror=return-type -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy >-Wno-overlength-strings -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wno-variadic-macros -Wcast-align -O2 > -pipe -f > no-strict-aliasing -fno-exceptions -fno-strict-aliasing -fshort-wchar -ffunction-sections >-fdata-sections -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -I/usr/local/include/nss >-I/usr/local/include/nss/nss -I/usr/local/include -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include >../../../../mozilla-config.h >/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/security/manager/ssl/src/nsNSSErrors.cpp >/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/security/manager/ssl/src/nsNSSComponent.cpp: In >member function 'virtual nsresult nsCryptoHash::Finish(bool, nsACString_internal&)': >/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/security/manager/ssl/src/nsNSSComponent.cpp:2879: >error: 'BTOA_DataToAscii' was not declared in this scope >/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/security/manager/ssl/src/nsNSSComponent.cpp: In >member function 'virtual nsresult nsCryptoHMAC::Finish(bool, nsACString_internal&)': >/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/security/manager/ssl/src/nsNSSComponent.cpp:3070: >error: 'BTOA_DataToAscii' was not declared in this scope >gmake[5]: *** [nsNSSComponent.o] Error 1 >gmake[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >gmake[5]: Leaving directory >`/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.3/security/manager/ssl/src' >gmake[4]: *** [libs] Error 2 >gmake[4]: Leaving directory >`/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.3/security/manager/ssl' >gmake[3]: *** [libs] Error 2 >gmake[3]: Leaving directory >`/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.3/security/manager' >gmake[2]: *** [libs_tier_platform] Error 2 >gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.3' >gmake[1]: *** [tier_platform] Error 2 >gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.3' >gmake: *** [default] Error 2 >*** Error code 1 > > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 06:34:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE61106564A for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 06:34:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1B48FC0C for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 06:34:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8805B5E292 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:34:41 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.061 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.061 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.158, BAYES_00=-2.599, RDNS_NONE=0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.596] Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id DjHiXg9REk0g for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:34:39 +0200 (CEST) X-BN-MX1: ja X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (unknown [195.216.54.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67F5D5E1BD for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:34:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5028A00D.4020504@eskk.nu> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:34:53 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120728 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Trying to install fusefs-ntfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 06:34:48 -0000 I get this error and I'm not sure how to fix it. Any suggestions? My system is 8.2-RELEASE-p9 with all src downloaded via csup. Thanks /Leslie ===> Returning to build of fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1.20080208_10 ===> Configuring for fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1.20080208_10 cp: /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_kernel.h: No such file or directory *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 07:03:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1331065678 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 07:03:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.t@mail.com) Received: from mailout-us.mail.com (mailout-us.mail.com [74.208.122.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D2E778FC0C for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 07:03:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2012 07:03:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO blazon-pc.runningwild.local) [78.84.105.231] by mail.gmx.com (mp-us011) with SMTP; 13 Aug 2012 03:03:34 -0400 X-Authenticated: #76218138 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/pnDh03XnpnHoO3CXXav2L3cW0Lq3Kovw3NE/fTn 7yeM9nz/dZAQ/t Message-ID: <5028A6C4.4090509@mail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:03:32 +0300 From: Jeff Tipton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5028A00D.4020504@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <5028A00D.4020504@eskk.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: Trying to install fusefs-ntfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 07:03:42 -0000 On 08/13/2012 09:34, Leslie Jensen wrote: > > I get this error and I'm not sure how to fix it. > > Any suggestions? > > My system is 8.2-RELEASE-p9 with all src downloaded via csup. > > > Thanks > > /Leslie > > > > ===> Returning to build of fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1.20080208_10 > ===> Configuring for fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1.20080208_10 > cp: /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_kernel.h: No such file or directory > *** Error code 1 So, you don't have this file? fusefs-libs port should have provided it: #pkg_info -L fusefs-libs-2.7.4 Information for fusefs-libs-2.7.4: Files: /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse.h /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_compat.h /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_common.h /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_common_compat.h /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_lowlevel.h /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_lowlevel_compat.h /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_opt.h /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_kernel.h /usr/local/include/fuse.h /usr/local/include/ulockmgr.h /usr/local/lib/libfuse.a /usr/local/lib/libfuse.la /usr/local/lib/libfuse.so /usr/local/lib/libfuse.so.2 /usr/local/lib/libulockmgr.la /usr/local/lib/libulockmgr.a /usr/local/lib/libulockmgr.so /usr/local/lib/libulockmgr.so.1 /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/fuse.pc /usr/local/share/doc/fusefs/libs/how-fuse-works /usr/local/share/doc/fusefs/libs/kernel.txt Do you have that port installed? It's among dependencies of fusefs-ntfs. > > Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 07:17:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CFFD106564A for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 07:17:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170CC8FC19 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 07:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67335E292; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:17:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.061 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.061 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.158, BAYES_00=-2.599, RDNS_NONE=0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.596] Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 4BIADHs5sI+N; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:17:04 +0200 (CEST) X-BN-MX1: ja X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (unknown [195.216.54.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC9655E18D; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:17:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5028A9FE.3070702@eskk.nu> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:17:18 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120728 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Tipton References: <5028A00D.4020504@eskk.nu> <5028A6C4.4090509@mail.com> In-Reply-To: <5028A6C4.4090509@mail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trying to install fusefs-ntfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 07:17:07 -0000 2012-08-13 09:03, Jeff Tipton skrev: > On 08/13/2012 09:34, Leslie Jensen wrote: >> >> I get this error and I'm not sure how to fix it. >> >> Any suggestions? >> >> My system is 8.2-RELEASE-p9 with all src downloaded via csup. >> >> >> Thanks >> >> /Leslie >> >> >> >> ===> Returning to build of fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1.20080208_10 >> ===> Configuring for fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1.20080208_10 >> cp: /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_kernel.h: No such file or directory >> *** Error code 1 > So, you don't have this file? fusefs-libs port should have provided it: > #pkg_info -L fusefs-libs-2.7.4 > Information for fusefs-libs-2.7.4: > > Files: > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse.h > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_compat.h > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_common.h > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_common_compat.h > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_lowlevel.h > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_lowlevel_compat.h > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_opt.h > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_kernel.h > /usr/local/include/fuse.h > /usr/local/include/ulockmgr.h > /usr/local/lib/libfuse.a > /usr/local/lib/libfuse.la > /usr/local/lib/libfuse.so > /usr/local/lib/libfuse.so.2 > /usr/local/lib/libulockmgr.la > /usr/local/lib/libulockmgr.a > /usr/local/lib/libulockmgr.so > /usr/local/lib/libulockmgr.so.1 > /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/fuse.pc > /usr/local/share/doc/fusefs/libs/how-fuse-works > /usr/local/share/doc/fusefs/libs/kernel.txt > > > Do you have that port installed? It's among dependencies of fusefs-ntfs. >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs. >> Thanks! Problem solved :-) /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 09:40:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E181065675 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:40:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ashkan82r@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7868FC08 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhfs35 with SMTP id s35so3510696yhf.13 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 02:40:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=RXe3DYfaoH5XYI1kxQUWZniYjC6fvkhIlWQ/40Z2GoE=; b=NPHtZlPFGVG0ppfdUe7wmQDmCE7fLeSUMv0uTm5TOYBD0wjBBL6YBi9YMOMpd7/6Eh j4rec8J8POu16i5MAc23CaYrcNkwJH+aBwxJfcYcCRseqcTcG7RDkpyaNTCEA4+mhf5A NW+7N0nWVWDt/QQoqkPkQtfu/+NHISQDjULItJl1doxvUlDY5MUjDyi55FUqdZ5IEpiy 7VAUPAPHlg0zIjBze/MLcQfbazuqmq3DPprtH9putpWf+39osLPR95FAZ85VQk3qrJ7y 1ENqHujka+VJYhNL0gKdgBIY20wkA0NtZgy6oRQYubmFzfzlkDZHyvV5xtTNRN0TI5jp HqUA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.187.228 with SMTP id fv4mr2047542igc.37.1344850858029; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 02:40:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.171.51 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 02:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.171.51 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 02:40:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:10:57 +0430 Message-ID: From: Ashkan Rahmani To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Optimus vga on notebook X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:40:59 -0000 Hello I have asus j52k core i5 notebook. its graphic card is optimus nvidia 310m. i'm using debian on it and work great. now I need to install freebsd 9. every things are great but vga. pciinfo shows my vga card is nvidia and company is Intel corp. vga resolution is not correct. it is 1024*768. xorg -configure and manual editing xorg.conf not work. ports/x11 driver / nvidial driver not work too. even as my last try i tried Intel driver and not work. i load nvidia module and linux module, and finally i installed ubunu and freebsd on vmware. please help about this, i need to install freebsd on my notenbook =97=97=97 Ashkan R From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 10:57:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB93106566C for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:57:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@rgbaz.eu) Received: from mx.800biz.com (mx.800biz.com [66.98.138.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A668FC08 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from titan.secsrv.net ([69.175.78.10]) by jasper.secsrv.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1T0sKX-0000cs-MI for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 06:57:05 -0400 Received: from amadeus.demon.nl ([82.161.18.200]:54480 helo=[10.0.1.101]) by titan.secsrv.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T0sKW-0005Of-Kh for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:57:05 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) From: FBSD UG In-Reply-To: <6F12D89C-6D39-4504-B0D5-144ED8E6218B@rgbaz.eu> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:57:03 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <6F12D89C-6D39-4504-B0D5-144ED8E6218B@rgbaz.eu> To: FreeBSD Mailing List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - jasper.secsrv.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - rgbaz.eu X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: af_atalk.c error FBSD 9.0Rp4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:57:13 -0000 aaah nevermind... sigh... just for the archive, I'm learning C and had setenv GCC_EXEC_PREFIX "c-program" setenv C_INCLUDE_PATH=3D/usr/local/include which were preventing certain things to compile... and then 'Computer says "no"' gr arno On 10 aug 2012, at 15:40, FBSD UG wrote: > hello! >=20 > I'm trying to buildworld on my FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p4 > server after successfully installing the kernel, but keep > running into the same error no matter what I do. >=20 > I've been googling for days now and must either be looking > in the wrong directions or it's not there. >=20 > The error I get is the following: >=20 > cc -O2 -pipe -DINET6 -DINET -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual = -Wwrite-strings -Wnested-externs -DRESCUE -std=3Dgnu99 -fstack-protector = -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized = -Wno-pointer-sign -c /usr/src/sbin/ifconfig/af_atalk.c > /usr/src/sbin/ifconfig/af_atalk.c: In function 'at_status': > /usr/src/sbin/ifconfig/af_atalk.c:94: error: 'struct sockaddr_at' has = no member named 'sat_range' > /usr/src/sbin/ifconfig/af_atalk.c: In function 'at_getaddr': > /usr/src/sbin/ifconfig/af_atalk.c:123: error: 'struct sockaddr_at' has = no member named 'sat_len' > /usr/src/sbin/ifconfig/af_atalk.c: In function 'at_postproc': > /usr/src/sbin/ifconfig/af_atalk.c:152: error: 'struct sockaddr_at' has = no member named 'sat_range' > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src/sbin/ifconfig. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/rescue/rescue. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src/rescue/rescue. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src/rescue. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src. >=20 >=20 > I do also get this when I cd into /usr/src/sbin/ifconfig and type = make. >=20 >=20 > This is my kernelconfig I compiled the kernel with: >=20 > cpu I686_CPU > ident KERNEL9 >=20 > options SCHED_ULE = # ULE scheduler > options PREEMPTION = # Enable kernel thread preemption > options INET = # InterNETworking > options INET6 = # IPv6 communications protocols > options SCTP = # Stream Control Transmission Protocol > options FFS = # Berkeley Fast Filesystem > options SOFTUPDATES = # Enable FFS soft updates support > options UFS_ACL = # Support for access control lists > options UFS_DIRHASH = # Improve performance on big directories > options UFS_GJOURNAL # Enable = gjournal-based UFS journaling > options MD_ROOT = # MD is a potential root device > options NFSCL = # New Network Filesystem Client > options NFSD = # New Network Filesystem Server > options NFSLOCKD = # Network Lock Manager > options NFS_ROOT = # NFS usable as /, requires NFSCLIENT > options MSDOSFS = # MSDOS Filesystem > options CD9660 = # ISO 9660 Filesystem > options PROCFS = # Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS) > options PSEUDOFS = # Pseudo-filesystem framework > options GEOM_PART_GPT # GUID = Partition Tables. > options GEOM_LABEL = # Provides labelization > options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible = with FreeBSD4 > options COMPAT_FREEBSD5 # Compatible = with FreeBSD5 > options COMPAT_FREEBSD6 # Compatible = with FreeBSD6 > options COMPAT_FREEBSD7 # Compatible = with FreeBSD7 > options SCSI_DELAY=3D1000 = # Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI > options KTRACE = # ktrace(1) support > options STACK = # stack(9) support > options SYSVSHM = # SYSV-style shared memory > options SYSVMSG = # SYSV-style message queues > options SYSVSEM = # SYSV-style semaphores > options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B = real-time extensions > options PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=3D128 # Prevent printf = output being interspersed. > options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # = install a CDEV entry in /dev > options HWPMC_HOOKS # = Necessary kernel hooks for hwpmc(4) > options AUDIT = # Security event auditing > options MAC = # TrustedBSD MAC Framework > options KDTRACE_HOOKS # Kernel = DTrace hooks > options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE # Include this = file in kernel >=20 > ### added > options QUOTA # quota on > options XFS # XFS filesystem > options GEOM_PART_APM # Apple HFS+ support > options NETATALK # appletalk > options KVA_PAGES=3D500 # max 500 for WineHQ > options MROUTING # multicast = routing kernel module >=20 >=20 > # To make an SMP kernel, the next two lines are needed > device apic # I/O APIC >=20 > # Bus support. > device acpi > device eisa > device pci >=20 > # Floppy drives > device fdc >=20 > # ATA controllers > device ahci # AHCI-compatible SATA = controllers > device ata # Legacy ATA/SATA = controllers > options ATA_CAM # Handle legacy controllers with CAM > options ATA_STATIC_ID # Static device numbering >=20 > # SCSI Controllers > device ahc = # AHA2940 and onboard AIC7xxx devices > options AHC_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in = debug > = # output. Adds ~128k to driver. > device aic = # Adaptec 15[012]x SCSI adapters, AIC-6[23]60. >=20 > # ATA/SCSI peripherals > device scbus # SCSI bus (required for ATA/SCSI) > device da # Direct Access (disks) > device sa # Sequential Access (tape etc) > device pass # Passthrough device (direct ATA/SCSI = access) > device ses # SCSI Environmental Services = (and SAF-TE) >=20 > # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse > device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller > device atkbd # AT keyboard > device psm # PS/2 mouse >=20 > device vga # VGA video card driver >=20 > device splash # Splash screen and screen saver = support >=20 > # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console > device sc > options SC_PIXEL_MODE # add support for the raster text mode >=20 > # Power management support (see NOTES for more options) > device apm > device pmtimer >=20 > # Parallel port > device ppc > device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) > device lpt # Printer > device ppi # Parallel port interface device >=20 > # PCI Ethernet NICs that use the common MII bus controller code. > # NOTE: Be sure to keep the 'device miibus' line in order to use these = NICs! > device miibus # MII bus support >=20 > # Pseudo devices. > device loop # Network loopback > device random # Entropy device > device ether # Ethernet support > device pty # BSD-style = compatibility pseudo ttys > device md # Memory "disks" > device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 = tunneling > device faith # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying = (translation) > device firmware # firmware assist module >=20 > # The `bpf' device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter. > # Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this! > # Note that 'bpf' is required for DHCP. > device bpf # Berkeley packet filter >=20 > # USB support > device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface > device usb # USB Bus (required) > device uhid # "Human Interface Devices" > device ukbd # Keyboard > device ulpt # Printer > device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus = and da > device ums # Mouse >=20 > # MISCELLANEOUS DEVICES AND OPTIONS: > device speaker # Play IBM BASIC-style noises = out your speaker > # iscsi: > device iscsi_initiator >=20 > ### OPTIONS FROM OLD KERNEL (FIREWALL): > options IPFIREWALL = # Include firewall > options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE = # Include firewall logging > options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=3D100 # Log max=3D100 > options IPDIVERT = # Include divert in firewall > options IPSTEALTH = # Hide from traceroutes >=20 > Has anyone run into this before or has some tips for me how to solve = this? >=20 > thanks in advance >=20 > Arno B_______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 11:17:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E09106566B for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:17:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82638FC0A for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-93-72.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.93.72]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CE927650; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:17:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7DBHfdV001927; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:17:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:17:41 +0200 From: Polytropon To: shiaha.com@gmail.com Message-Id: <20120813131741.ab1c4c5f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Web webmaster , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:17:49 -0000 On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 22:55:08 +0330, Web webmaster wrote: > hi > > Direct Admin and enter the desired installation package gives error > > Command:pkg_add -r gmake perl > > > Error: Unable to get > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-7.4-release/Latest/gmake.tbz: > File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > pkg_add: unable to fetch ' > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-7.4-release/Latest/gmake.tbz' > by URL > Broken pipe You're running a quite old version (7.4/amd64), but that's not a problem. You need to change the root for fetching the packages to a different path, i. e. ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-7-stable/Latest/ See "man pkg_add" for details - PACKAGEROOT has to be set to the mentioned path. There are no 7.4-release packages on the FTP server, but the 7-stable packages should work. You could also use ftp to manually fetch the packages and then install them without the -r flag; note that this case does not involve any dependency resolution! ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-7-stable/Latest/gmake.tbz ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-7-stable/Latest/perl.tbz If possible, you may consider updating your system to a newer version, 8.3 or 9.0 if it fits your requirements. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 11:24:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46830106564A for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:24:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079B68FC12 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-93-72.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.93.72]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2071245E1; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:24:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7DBO5IU001958; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:24:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:24:05 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Brett Glass Message-Id: <20120813132405.8f912cab.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <201208130250.UAA08187@lariat.net> References: <201208130250.UAA08187@lariat.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to keep freebsd-update from trashing custom kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:24:08 -0000 On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:50:43 -0600, Brett Glass wrote: > Everyone: > > Just ran freebsd-update (fetch, then install) on a system on which > I run a customized kernel, and discovered that it has overwritten > my custom kernel... even though I'd copied the original to > /boot/GENERIC when I first installed the system. I was under the > impression that creating /boot/GENERIC, and putting the GENERIC > kernel in it, would cause freebsd-update to update that directory > rather than one's custom kernel. I now must rebuild the kernel to > keep the machine working. That seems to be the default behaviour, as freebsd-update is not supposed to be used with a custom kernel. It works with GENERIC kernels (because it updates them by overwriting). > What went wrong, and how do stop it from recurring? Nothing went wrong. :-) Just an idea, not tested: Leave the GENERIC kernel updated by freebsd-update, and put your own kernel unter a different name into /boot, for example: /boot/kernel/kernel <- GENERIC kernel /boot/mykernel/kernel <- your kernel Then change /boot/loader.conf to contain: kernel="mykernel" bootfile="/boot/mykernel/kernel" See /boot/defaults/loader.conf and "man loader.conf" for details. I'm _not_ sure freebsd-update doesn't touch that file, but if my assumption is correct, it won't, and it will therefore only update /boot/kernel/ containing the GENERIC kernel that matches your binarily updated world (so it's a good fallback kernel in case of problems!), and you boot from /boot/mykernel which still contains your untouched kernel. However, what you're doing seems to be "not supported", but it would be a shame if it was impossible. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 11:40:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539C2106566C for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1216C8FC18 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:40:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-93-72.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.93.72]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F2227686; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:40:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7DBecth001995; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:40:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:40:38 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Ashkan Rahmani Message-Id: <20120813134038.4c2afd8a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Optimus vga on notebook X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:40:40 -0000 On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:10:57 +0430, Ashkan Rahmani wrote: > Hello > I have asus j52k core i5 notebook. its graphic card is optimus nvidia 310m. > i'm using debian on it and work great. now I need to install freebsd 9. > every things are great but vga. > pciinfo shows my vga card is nvidia and company is Intel corp. > vga resolution is not correct. it is 1024*768. > xorg -configure and manual editing xorg.conf not work. > ports/x11 driver / nvidial driver not work too. > even as my last try i tried Intel driver and not work. > i load nvidia module and linux module, The nVidia GeForce 310m should be supported. Have you tried the x11/nvidia-driver? Maybe this forum posts (title: "Problems with video (nVidia GeForce 310M and FreeBSD 8.2") can help you: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=24392 You should have no problems using the binary driver from nvidia-driver (kernel module plus X driver). I'm using it here myself with a regular nVidia PC graphics card. If your display characteristics aren't detected properly (but that should be no problem on a laptop), you are right by "hard-coding" them into xorg.conf. Please refer to the Handbook chapter about configuring X to deal with possible upcoming problems when using xorg.conf. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-config.html And also see: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/aei.html That document could save you from avoidable trouble. :-) > and finally i installed ubunu and freebsd on vmware. Does it run there properly? VMware defines a "virtual graphics card" that should be compatible with the X driver for Intel cards, if I remember correctly. > please help about this, i need to install freebsd on my notenbook Try to follow the instructions precisely and check each step. In case of problems, provide more information (commands you tried, their results, significant log messages etc.). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 15:20:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C041065680 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:20:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from venkatduvvuru.ml@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106FB8FC16 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:20:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so9492252obb.13 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:20:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bnTlzO64eGHR8kOCc1lkn8ACv475XO9DPj+XwOzzXG8=; b=lylApt8JEStSHQPJ1XnZCEFniD4Kc9jL7L6w0BigIcKH98FeGgMeMLdBRwTlX0R05W /eTIH8AlV6dvlfVbA/nsBDo8oBJfqgWJUdhru2DYlIT53REyw8MPZodPgNIwvTwKItQU H/Fb2FcHeb0bYC9sIgngbhVngnXZoDsQfU84XB/Pd4lqdzyl1Y70zq6FUAuaL6A924j4 MHIjzl90zrJwuKV2jB2cmO/FxXWEjh0SIKJAWxFXALdrHjt8qv8UQYFHtxHklmuRhu5g Q7bLGHAmHGwQyG16IckvDSbdD4YXQRcrJiamiKglBz4jAqo9MZw7g1PQTKpqAda9981F Trdw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.174.68 with SMTP id bq4mr12592989obc.53.1344871232091; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:20:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.84.202 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:20:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:50:32 +0530 Message-ID: From: Venkat Duvvuru To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: ether_vlanencap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:20:33 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to insert vlan tag into the packet using "ether_vlanencap" but the packet is getting corrupted in the mbuf and m_len is also showing a wrong length. Am I doing something wrong here? Can I directly pass mbuf pointer and vlan tag to this api for inserting the vlan tag? /Venkat From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 16:35:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99A3106566C for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 16:35:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905FE8FC12 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 16:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from WildRover.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2] (may be forged)) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA15079; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:35:15 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <201208131635.KAA15079@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:35:12 -0600 To: Polytropon From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <20120813132405.8f912cab.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <201208130250.UAA08187@lariat.net> <20120813132405.8f912cab.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to keep freebsd-update from trashing custom kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 16:35:23 -0000 At 05:24 AM 8/13/2012, Polytropon wrote: >That seems to be the default behaviour, as freebsd-update is >not supposed to be used with a custom kernel. It works with >GENERIC kernels (because it updates them by overwriting). Actually, freebsd-update is claimed to respect custom kernels. See the FreeBSD Handbook at 25.2.2: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html "The freebsd-update utility can automatically update the GENERIC kernel only. If a custom kernel is in use, it will have to be rebuilt and reinstalled after freebsd-update finishes installing the rest of the updates. However, freebsd-update will detect and update the GENERIC kernel in /boot/GENERIC (if it exists), even if it is not the current (running) kernel of the system." But in fact, freebsd-update did not update the kernel in /boot/GENERIC on my system. Instead, it trashed the customer kernel in /boot/kernel, and did so with no warning. If there had been a power outage or other problem before I could rebuild, the system would have been disabled. --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 17:33:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5105106566B for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:33:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620A88FC12 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:33:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so3519229wgb.31 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:33:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=G2O7rRvqFixrXGY3Obt6DNKYz1l1n/V2DkuC5mBOS5g=; b=K0DL08mQOMQosH6WPpD88FaNmPfa7N0QQjgwTF+NEK6LPM81NMjtw4HrZb9UyTt3le nMMGV7IAn/LU33Yzi8QL2y+90zsakhSnUfo1IpN/+oz/QkiHbKH0gTyO51j7HEXfSvjR yBKiBWdNiWoLA1nh5BeqjWyKKSDs7zokwS86fyGlp3vQYe+cm7uRa7Zfi+a/mUK3ecK6 V+krGA2ux2VcYg5QC+N03JuELygHuDXBkuuWrbyNic2dzmIxGvMtxKOvgOe6uR/GVGBl +B/L3WXcLA/ntfYwdoMDjkPmK8SFOTH74AKrb50/+m7tPwI3Owanci6/9EKcdUcoOvkA aKFw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.7.200 with SMTP id l8mr20201684wia.9.1344879185582; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.160.9 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:33:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201208131635.KAA15079@lariat.net> References: <201208130250.UAA08187@lariat.net> <20120813132405.8f912cab.freebsd@edvax.de> <201208131635.KAA15079@lariat.net> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:33:05 -0700 Message-ID: From: Michael Sierchio To: Brett Glass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnD0eMDRXYbi849lK398AWMEdPNoPZyU/RvMBg7i5ydE52XkVq9Q2CN8KETMWjOszHHYaQc Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Polytropon Subject: Re: How to keep freebsd-update from trashing custom kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:33:07 -0000 On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Brett Glass wrote: > Actually, freebsd-update is claimed to respect custom kernels. ... And it does, in my experience. If the hash of the kernel doesn't match that of the distribution (or recent update), freebsd-update leaves it alone. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 18:59:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0676E106566B for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:59:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6F78FC0C for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:59:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-93-72.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.93.72]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B6B2780C; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:59:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7DIxdL2001883; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:59:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:59:39 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Brett Glass Message-Id: <20120813205939.1887487d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <201208131635.KAA15079@lariat.net> References: <201208130250.UAA08187@lariat.net> <20120813132405.8f912cab.freebsd@edvax.de> <201208131635.KAA15079@lariat.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to keep freebsd-update from trashing custom kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:59:46 -0000 On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:35:12 -0600, Brett Glass wrote: > At 05:24 AM 8/13/2012, Polytropon wrote: > > >That seems to be the default behaviour, as freebsd-update is > >not supposed to be used with a custom kernel. It works with > >GENERIC kernels (because it updates them by overwriting). > > Actually, freebsd-update is claimed to respect custom kernels. See > the FreeBSD Handbook at 25.2.2: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html > > "The freebsd-update utility can automatically update the GENERIC > kernel only. If a custom kernel is in use, it will have to be > rebuilt and reinstalled after freebsd-update finishes installing > the rest of the updates. However, freebsd-update will detect and > update the GENERIC kernel in /boot/GENERIC (if it exists), even if > it is not the current (running) kernel of the system." Interesting, didn't know that (because I typically use freebsd-update with a GENERIC kernel and then load modules if needed). > But in fact, freebsd-update did not update the kernel in > /boot/GENERIC on my system. Instead, it trashed the customer kernel > in /boot/kernel, and did so with no warning. If there had been a > power outage or other problem before I could rebuild, the system > would have been disabled. I've never seen a system having a /boot/GENERIC directory containing the GENERIC kernel. The default location even for the GENERIC (but also for a custom) kernel is /boot/kernel, where the kernel itself is /boot/kernel/kernel. It's possible to do some renaming here and change /boot/loader.conf accordingly as mentioned in my previous message. If such preparations have been taken place, freebsd-update could alter /boot/kernel content without problems, leaving /boot/mykernel untouched. The boot mechanism would then continue using _that_ directory. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 19:39:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B22106564A for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 19:39:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E347A8FC16 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 19:39:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so9878241obb.13 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:39:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=eNDHSe7uCV9iRp1i0UKhlJyyc5U710LspSy9Z9AwgAE=; b=A51WbW4vmnSoET4lgJozKW0Z35kEhJo/jrDzIYwzoPQawZYkmozHQXMxdbH0A9ROBO O2RKtce/YnXFz+lYVhJy2IcMxwdlxtRVbJ0M1fHKPn5vcdBdEmVT2wIFrKPhWwSHr16I bulgCQ4CB/bevn8v4aIuB8nS+lefRMeyPvP3m4C2mLmiV+XIwJHY4g+36LA8sSiIeQ0t xh12aGpOW7Ox9jrAK/njcCE9u0j6ZR45nn9ULswece/5bVbSASlqihQQCUtWFgwAIATO hD+DvfyQ/zWFqF5xKlJj3pE3GYMpYaos2in/kJawy2vLCa/7C99QsvslyPmQaYi7XA+0 GY8w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.72.9 with SMTP id z9mr14625074obu.5.1344886740160; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:39:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.182.73.40 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:39:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:39:00 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: m94BjaNEsQf-5l3kjp0us0Z34VE Message-ID: From: Rick Miller To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: vlan tagging in releng/8.3 not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 19:39:01 -0000 Hi All, I am running the latest releng/8.3 on a HP DL360 with an Intel 82599 10G NIC using the ixgbe driver. Without vlan tagging, tcpdump sees traffic on the default vlan. With vlan tagging there is no traffic on the interface. Wondering if anyone else has seen similar and/or might be able to provide some additional information? I'm not seeing anything in syslog. The interface is configured via rc.conf: cloned_interfaces="vlan0" ifconfig_vlan0="inet 10.x.x.x netmask=255.255.255.0 vlan $id vlandev ix0" Where $id is our vlan id. -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 20:07:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2671106573B for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:07:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8026C8FC08 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from WildRover.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2] (may be forged)) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA18078; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:07:07 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <201208132007.OAA18078@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:07:05 -0600 To: Michael Sierchio From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: References: <201208130250.UAA08187@lariat.net> <20120813132405.8f912cab.freebsd@edvax.de> <201208131635.KAA15079@lariat.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Polytropon Subject: Re: How to keep freebsd-update from trashing custom kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:07:18 -0000 At 11:33 AM 8/13/2012, Michael Sierchio wrote: >And it does, in my experience. If the hash of the kernel doesn't >match that of the distribution (or recent update), freebsd-update >leaves it alone. That is what I thought it would do, based on the docs. However, when I recently ran freebsd-update on a FreeBSD 9.0 machine with a module-less custom kernel at /boot/kernel/kernel, it fetched a GENERIC kernel and overwrote the custom kernel with it. Interestingly, it didn't bring in any modules; it just overwrote the one file. --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 20:09:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F061106566C for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:09:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5AB8FC1E for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from WildRover.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2] (may be forged)) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA18122; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:09:26 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <201208132009.OAA18122@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:09:24 -0600 To: Polytropon From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <20120813205939.1887487d.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <201208130250.UAA08187@lariat.net> <20120813132405.8f912cab.freebsd@edvax.de> <201208131635.KAA15079@lariat.net> <20120813205939.1887487d.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to keep freebsd-update from trashing custom kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:09:31 -0000 At 12:59 PM 8/13/2012, Polytropon wrote: >I've never seen a system having a /boot/GENERIC directory >containing the GENERIC kernel. It does not come that way. The Handbook recommends that one manuall copy the original kernel from the distribution into /boot/GENERIC before building a custom kernel, for use in emergencies and during version upgrades. --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 00:52:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C761065676 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:52:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EC28FC0C for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:52:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicr5 with SMTP id r5so2451654wic.13 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:52:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=mSAdYcLMOhmMeAgiXKzbyWDoMasRyldFdQ4yCVYI//Q=; b=GSGH3XM8NE0/F/w8/Rs4QKGcTobAOWu2qyjQomeK1bTtcT1b4qCr/mTCsD7Ifj7eiO Xq0LW4McF+Q7CT8FkrX8HZnFs+x/ztHZW7Asow1dHZ1OlRPJNebZuiLrR9mn2eQO1ENq sTWJcApQRqqTGBSEfh3Opo98Sed+WgPf0prmeaKG+dSIXMOjuJUD88gyr2Jjrfxv5hKl PTR3WJtnhfolZYv14xEOq1bDwrRRdOKKNea62TO/0rsp1adpqWA1tj89lbdrdKgmLDzB e5awEbekjR9d4sS3HIn6A7HB7tIev+bNcZXqi/uw4QhPl1bYVJG9L/Qs/uwtdgTWUdJv o34Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.85.149 with SMTP id u21mr6941206wee.147.1344905549633; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:52:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.160.9 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:52:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201208132007.OAA18078@lariat.net> References: <201208130250.UAA08187@lariat.net> <20120813132405.8f912cab.freebsd@edvax.de> <201208131635.KAA15079@lariat.net> <201208132007.OAA18078@lariat.net> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:52:29 -0700 Message-ID: From: Michael Sierchio To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmA29FKuQBT1OQtuv7S+zSSe4mW+P0aRoVSioIaxIEt9DJkaoG2bnepzlvmaxATC1BJmaMZ Cc: Subject: Re: How to keep freebsd-update from trashing custom kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:52:31 -0000 On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Brett Glass wrote: > At 11:33 AM 8/13/2012, Michael Sierchio wrote: > >> And it does, in my experience. If the hash of the kernel doesn't >> match that of the distribution (or recent update), freebsd-update >> leaves it alone. > > > That is what I thought it would do, based on the docs. However, when I > recently ran freebsd-update on a FreeBSD 9.0 machine with a module-less > custom kernel at /boot/kernel/kernel, it fetched a GENERIC kernel and > overwrote the custom kernel with it. Interestingly, it didn't bring in any > modules; it just overwrote the one file. I am skeptical, since this is counter to design and experience. I'm not saying it isn't possible, but so far it's not reproducible. When you say you updated a FreeBSD 9.0 machine, was it... 9.0-RELEASE? 9.0-RELEASE-pX ? i386? amd64? - M From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 02:51:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6952B10656A6 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:51:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@neu.net) Received: from mail.neu.net (unknown [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:d300:216:3eff:fe54:f1c6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5348FC14 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:51:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from neu.net (neu.net [199.48.129.194]) by mail.neu.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7E6pHHR038951 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:51:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@neu.net) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:51:17 -0400 (EDT) From: AN To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: sendmail + clamav + spamassasin config help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:51:20 -0000 FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243: Mon Aug 13 19:20:19 EDT 2012 root@mail.neu.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav + spamassasin. The problem I have is that neither clamav or spamassasin runs when I send or receive email. I would like the server to do the following: 1. check dns blacklists, which is working (see below) ug 14 02:00:49 mail sm-mta[38460]: NOQUEUE: connect from [37.121.149.208] Aug 14 02:00:49 mail sm-mta[38460]: NOQUEUE: dns 208.149.121.37.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org. => 127.0.0.4 Aug 14 02:00:49 mail sm-mta[38460]: NOQUEUE: --- 550 5.7.1 Rejected: 37.121.149.208 listed at sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org (hold) Aug 14 02:00:49 mail sm-mta[38460]: ruleset=check_relay, arg1=[37.121.149.208], arg2=127.0.0.4, relay=[37.121.149.208], reject=550 5.7.1 Rejected: 37.121.149.208 listed at sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org Aug 14 02:00:49 mail sm-mta[38460]: q7E60nxW038460: --- 220 mail.neu.net ESMTP Sendmail 8.14.5/8.14.5; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:00:49 -0400 (EDT) Aug 14 02:00:49 mail sm-mta[38460]: q7E60nxW038460: --- 421 4.4.1 mail.neu.net Lost input channel from [37.121.149.208] Aug 14 02:00:53 mail sm-mta[38461]: NOQUEUE: connect from [37.121.149.208] Aug 14 02:00:54 mail sm-mta[38461]: NOQUEUE: dns 208.149.121.37.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org. => 127.0.0.4 Aug 14 02:00:54 mail sm-mta[38461]: NOQUEUE: --- 550 5.7.1 Rejected: 37.121.149.208 listed at sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org (hold) Aug 14 02:00:54 mail sm-mta[38461]: ruleset=check_relay, arg1=[37.121.149.208], arg2=127.0.0.4, relay=[37.121.149.208], reject=550 5.7.1 Rejected: 37.121.149.208 listed at sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org 2. run spamd 3. run clamav Aug 14 02:04:41 mail sm-mta[38464]: q7E64eCv038464: milter=clmilter, action=rcpt, continue Aug 14 02:04:41 mail sm-mta[38464]: q7E64eCv038464: milter=clmilter, action=header, continue Aug 14 02:04:41 mail last message repeated 12 times Aug 14 02:04:41 mail sm-mta[38464]: q7E64eCv038464: milter=clmilter, action=body, continue Aug 14 02:04:42 mail sm-mta[38464]: q7E64eCv038464: Milter accept: message Aug 14 02:04:42 mail sm-mta[38464]: q7E64eCv038464: --- 250 2.0.0 q7E64eCv038464 Message accepted for delivery spamd and clamav never execute. # cat mail.neu.net.mc divert(-1) # # Copyright (c) 1983 Eric P. Allman # Copyright (c) 1988, 1993 # The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. # # # # # This is a generic configuration file for FreeBSD 6.X and later systems. # If you want to customize it, copy it to a name appropriate for your # environment and do the modifications there. # # The best documentation for this .mc file is: # /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README or # /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/cf/README # divert(0) VERSIONID(`$FreeBSD: release/9.0.0/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc 223068 2011-06-14 04:33:43Z gshapiro $') OSTYPE(freebsd6) DOMAIN(generic) FEATURE(access_db, `hash -o -T /etc/mail/access') FEATURE(blacklist_recipients) FEATURE(local_lmtp) FEATURE(mailertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/mailertable') FEATURE(virtusertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable') dnl Uncomment to allow relaying based on your MX records. dnl NOTE: This can allow sites to use your server as a backup MX without dnl your permission. dnl FEATURE(relay_based_on_MX) dnl DNS based black hole lists dnl -------------------------------- dnl DNS based black hole lists come and go on a regular basis dnl so this file will not serve as a database of the available servers. dnl For that, visit dnl http://www.google.com/Top/Computers/Internet/E-mail/Spam/Blacklists/ dnl Uncomment to activate your chosen DNS based blacklist dnl FEATURE(dnsbl, `dnsbl.example.com') dnl Alternatively, you can provide your own server and rejection message: dnl FEATURE(dnsbl, `dnsbl.example.com', ``"550 Mail from " $&{client_addr} " rejected'') FEATURE(dnsbl,`sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org')dnl FEATURE(dnsbl,`bl.spamcop.net')dnl dnl Dialup users should uncomment and define this appropriately dnl define(`SMART_HOST', `your.isp.mail.server') dnl Uncomment the first line to change the location of the default dnl /etc/mail/local-host-names and comment out the second line. dnl define(`confCW_FILE', `-o /etc/mail/sendmail.cw') define(`confCW_FILE', `-o /etc/mail/local-host-names') INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clmilter', `S=local:/var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock, F=, T=S:4m;R:4m')dnl INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamassassin',`S=local:/var/run/spamass-milter.sock, F=, T=C:15m;S:4m;R:4m;E:10m')dnl define(`confINPUT_MAIL_FILTERS', `clmilter,spamassassin')dnl dnl Enable for both IPv4 and IPv6 (optional) DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv4, Family=inet') DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv6, Family=inet6, Modifiers=O') define(`confBIND_OPTS', `WorkAroundBrokenAAAA') define(`confNO_RCPT_ACTION', `add-to-undisclosed') define(`confPRIVACY_FLAGS', `authwarnings,noexpn,novrfy') MAILER(local) MAILER(smtp) [root@mail /etc/mail]#ps -aux root 1268 0.0 0.3 41200 2668 ?? Is 11:47PM 0:00.07 /usr/local/sbin/spamass-milter -f -p /var/run/spamass-milter.sock root 1276 0.0 3.8 125724 39080 ?? Ss 11:47PM 0:02.85 /usr/local/bin/spamd -c -d -r /var/run/spamd/spamd.pid (perl) root 1277 0.0 4.5 133916 45908 ?? I 11:47PM 0:07.54 spamd child (perl) root 1278 0.0 3.7 125724 37996 ?? I 11:47PM 0:00.01 spamd child (perl) clamav 1284 0.0 7.7 217948 79456 ?? Is 11:47PM 0:04.89 /usr/local/sbin/clamd clamav 1290 0.0 0.2 27540 2328 ?? Is 11:47PM 0:00.08 /usr/local/sbin/clamav-milter -c /usr/local/etc/clamav-milter.conf clamav 1296 0.0 0.2 45080 2312 ?? Is 11:47PM 0:03.12 /usr/local/bin/freshclam --daemon -p /var/run/clamav/freshclam.pid Clamav was compiled with the milter enabled. Please let me know what other info I can provide to help troubleshoot this, any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 04:52:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4AF2106564A for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 04:52:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D288FC08 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 04:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5209FE82840; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 21:52:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 21:52:35 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20120814045230.GA8454@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. Of_Interest: With 26 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Subject: TRENDnet, which? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 04:52:41 -0000 Well, it pays to check prices! the Avocent brand of KVM are an arm and *three* legs. I have abs no use for anything fancy. just want something to get me to boot status on different boxes... a number of you suggested a kvm switch with the brand "trendnet". anybody know which model? tia, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Twenty-six years of service to the Unix community. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 08:22:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1BC106566B for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 08:22:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from cp-out9.libero.it (cp-out9.libero.it [212.52.84.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A668FC0C for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 08:22:34 +0000 (UTC) X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0203.502A0ABA.009A,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-libjamoibt: 1555 Received: from soth.ventu (151.41.130.228) by cp-out9.libero.it (8.5.133) id 4FD1B5230A991CA3; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:22:18 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7E8MEir046622; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:22:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <502A0AB6.8080005@netfence.it> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:22:14 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120727 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, andy@neu.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 on 10.1.2.13 Cc: Subject: Re: sendmail + clamav + spamassasin config help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 08:22:34 -0000 On 08/14/12 08:51, AN wrote: > FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243: > Mon Aug 13 19:20:19 EDT 2012 > root@mail.neu.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav + spamassasin. The problem I > have is that neither clamav or spamassasin runs when I send or receive > email. I would like the server to do the following: > > 1. check dns blacklists, which is working (see below) Not really able to help you here... However, you may consider MIMEDefang (which in turn will run all of the above). At least, that's how I do it. HTH. bye av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 09:26:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A08B106566B for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:26:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (kontrol.kode5.net [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79AF98FC15 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (kontrol [127.0.0.1]) by kontrol.kode5.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7456C1129 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:26:26 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kode5.net Received: from kontrol.kode5.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kontrol.kode5.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yjAkgVT3iT5f for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:26:24 +0100 (BST) Received: by kontrol.kode5.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 68C6E6C1334; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:26:24 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:26:24 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120814092624.GA460@kontrol.kode5.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <502A0AB6.8080005@netfence.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <502A0AB6.8080005@netfence.it> x-operating-system: NetBSD 5.1_STABLE amd64 x-pgp-fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: sendmail + clamav + spamassasin config help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:26:28 -0000 [ Andrea Venturoli wrote on Tue 14.Aug'12 at 10:22:14 +0200 ] > On 08/14/12 08:51, AN wrote: > >FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243: > >Mon Aug 13 19:20:19 EDT 2012 > >root@mail.neu.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > >I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav + spamassasin. The problem I > >have is that neither clamav or spamassasin runs when I send or receive > >email. I would like the server to do the following: > > > >1. check dns blacklists, which is working (see below) > > Not really able to help you here... > However, you may consider MIMEDefang (which in turn will run all of > the above). At least, that's how I do it. or, you could consider using Postfix. It's much easier to configure and implement content filters. Jamie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 10:16:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D53106564A for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:16:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049E08FC12 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7EAGdo3011743; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:16:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q7EAGdTU011740; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:16:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:16:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Jamie Paul Griffin In-Reply-To: <20120814092624.GA460@kontrol.kode5.net> Message-ID: References: <502A0AB6.8080005@netfence.it> <20120814092624.GA460@kontrol.kode5.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:16:39 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail + clamav + spamassasin config help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:16:49 -0000 >> the above). At least, that's how I do it. > > or, you could consider using Postfix. It's much easier to configure and implement content filters. depends of who is talking and how "easiness" is defined. Postfix is different. That's all. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 11:29:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7AF106566C for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:29:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rgoeken1@verizon.net) Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net (vms173005pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB878FC12 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:29:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([unknown] [71.250.130.133]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0M8Q006EUT8IG510@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 06:29:07 -0500 (CDT) Message-id: <502A368A.1030502@verizon.net> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:29:14 -0400 From: Rich User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:35:29 +0000 Cc: Subject: Which Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:29:28 -0000 Hi, I was looking around and decided that I would try BSD. However, I am having a problem determining which release will work for me. I have a Intel Quad CPU Q6600, 64-bit. So the AMD64 is out, the i386 is out, and here I bog down, Can you please help? Thanks in advance, Rich Goeken From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 11:37:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924441065672 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:37:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mihamina@rktmb.org) Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4509E8FC18 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:37:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.138 Received: from mfilter9-d.gandi.net (mfilter9-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.138]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6049C172090 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:37:01 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter9-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter9-d.gandi.net (mfilter9-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zGT+3GRcp+jb for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:37:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 41.190.237.66 Received: from [192.168.0.111] (ip-41-190-237-66.orange.mg [41.190.237.66]) (Authenticated sender: out@rktmb.org) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8E0817208B for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:36:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <502A3858.7090302@rktmb.org> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:36:56 +0300 From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <502A368A.1030502@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <502A368A.1030502@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Which Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:37:12 -0000 On 08/14/2012 02:29 PM, Rich wrote: > o the AMD64 is out, the i386 is out, and here I bog down, Can you > please help? AFAIK it's AMD64. -- RMA. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 11:43:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E45C106566B for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:43:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E758FC0C for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:43:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so573707obb.13 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 04:43:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MXe5NWY8i0DjyUFdFq6HXlLyZqXsObinozGhG5AzC3U=; b=sG7vswAeUslMBSw0zCFuU69JZ2HpggAn97nAv6YR7rkG/Juz5X2R33ZVC6Khhc/d+L eFThh/Rjk4Mzx2TwyktY/SR4LRjjkZEd+Fx+dvgc0+YkVa5nc5Bfey9VwvYWCc6r2Luf UUdyj/dRsefaSESfjbk4X42gM9mpZ9u3WeTBVHYEXaovdRFwlo54PaUEzZGayCs5l5aK bffVRniYu0Qjl0f3mf1JUM+D0nEqB7mAER0rZJ3WUXuezjMffkLQWw8fh/ttEVO7a9hL xggemWUh3+plnegoGWt/VEvn8yA0lVeoMVYnLBNVtt0b44BypHuGc2TXc3sghrK3dW6G nNJA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.8.8 with SMTP id n8mr20092235oea.38.1344944612079; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 04:43:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.141.66 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 04:43:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <502A368A.1030502@verizon.net> References: <502A368A.1030502@verizon.net> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 04:43:32 -0700 Message-ID: From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: Rich Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:43:33 -0000 On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:29 AM, Rich wrote: > Hi, > > I was looking around and decided that I would try BSD. However, I am > having a problem determining which release will work for me. I have a > Intel Quad CPU Q6600, 64-bit. So the AMD64 is out, the i386 is out, and > here I bog down, Can you please help? > > Thanks in advance, > > Rich Goeken > You can use AMD64 or i386 named .ISO files . AMD64 is 64-bit Intel and AMD desktop or mobile processors which Q6600 is one of them . Please read : ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/8.3-RELEASE/HARDWARE.HTM Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 11:49:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1871A10656B6 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:49:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kheuer2@gwdg.de) Received: from fmailer.gwdg.de (fmailer.gwdg.de [134.76.11.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8938FC12 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gwdu60.gwdg.de ([134.76.8.60]) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1F2c-00023Y-Ew for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:12:06 +0200 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:12:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Konrad Heuer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Level: / X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 0.0 points, 6.0 required _SUMMARY_ X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie Subject: Problem report cannot be delivered X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:49:12 -0000 Hi everyone, a colleague of mine sent a problem report this morning by send-pr which cannot be delivered: gwdu60# mailq /var/spool/mqueue (1 request) -----Q-ID----- --Size-- -----Q-Time----- ------------Sender/Recipient----------- q7E8jguW058857 3186 Tue Aug 14 10:45 (Deferred: Connection refused by mx1.freebsd.org.) Total requests: 1 Are there any known problems? Best regards Konrad Heuer GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, kheuer2@gwdg.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 12:04:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4C11065675 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:04:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kheuer2@gwdg.de) Received: from fmailer.gwdg.de (fmailer.gwdg.de [134.76.11.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2C88FC22 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gwdu60.gwdg.de ([134.76.8.60]) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1Fr7-0005nV-Pm for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:04:18 +0200 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:04:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Konrad Heuer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Level: / X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 0.0 points, 6.0 required _SUMMARY_ X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie Subject: Re: Problem report cannot be delivered X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:04:19 -0000 Sorry for asking , firewall settings on our side ... Konrad Heuer GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, kheuer2@gwdg.de On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Konrad Heuer wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > a colleague of mine sent a problem report this morning by send-pr which > cannot be delivered: > > gwdu60# mailq > /var/spool/mqueue (1 request) > -----Q-ID----- --Size-- -----Q-Time----- > ------------Sender/Recipient----------- > q7E8jguW058857 3186 Tue Aug 14 10:45 > (Deferred: Connection refused by mx1.freebsd.org.) > > > Total requests: 1 > > Are there any known problems? > > Best regards > > Konrad Heuer > GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, kheuer2@gwdg.de > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 12:37:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5501065675 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121788FC12 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:37:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 14 Aug 2012 08:36:55 -0400 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BQC03609; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 08:36:55 -0400 Received: from 209-6-86-84.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.86.84]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 14 Aug 2012 08:36:56 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20522.18022.738666.269749@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 08:36:54 -0400 To: AN In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: sendmail + clamav + spamassasin config help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:37:02 -0000 AN writes: > I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav + spamassasin. The > problem I have is that neither clamav or spamassasin runs when I > send or receive email. I would like the server to do the > following: This has been running fine for years on one of my machines. Do you have spamassassin and clamd (and the milters) enabled in /etc/rc.conf? Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 16:01:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6261065673 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:01:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@jerrymc.net) Received: from jerrymc.net (jerrymc.net [75.75.214.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224028FC0A for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:01:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jerrymc.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jerrymc.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7EFe7LD066233; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:40:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@jerrymc.net) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by jerrymc.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7EFe7VR066232; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:40:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:40:07 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Rich Message-ID: <20120814154007.GA66165@jerrymc.net> References: <502A368A.1030502@verizon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <502A368A.1030502@verizon.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:01:27 -0000 On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 07:29:14AM -0400, Rich wrote: > Hi, > > I was looking around and decided that I would try BSD. However, I am > having a problem determining which release will work for me. I have a > Intel Quad CPU Q6600, 64-bit. So the AMD64 is out, the i386 is out, > and here I bog down, Can you please help? Due to a weird piece of history, the FreeBSD version for Intel 64 bit is called AMD64 (as well as for AMD chips). ////jerry > > Thanks in advance, > > Rich Goeken > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 16:01:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2137A1065676 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:01:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8EE8FC18 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q7EG45cE061565; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:04:05 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:04:05 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201208141604.q7EG45cE061565@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: andy@neu.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Cc: Subject: Re: sendmail + clamav + spamassasin config help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:01:46 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 13 21:55:24 2012 > Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:51:17 -0400 (EDT) > From: AN > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: sendmail + clamav + spamassasin config help > > FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243: > Mon Aug 13 19:20:19 EDT 2012 > root@mail.neu.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav + spamassasin. The problem I > have is that neither clamav or spamassasin runs when I send or receive > email. I would like the server to do the following: > > 1. check dns blacklists, which is working (see below) > > Aug 14 02:00:54 mail sm-mta[38461]: ruleset=check_relay, > arg1=[37.121.149.208], arg2=127.0.0.4, relay=[37.121.149.208], reject=550 > 5.7.1 Rejected: 37.121.149.208 listed at sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org Confirm. FEATURE dsnsbl is functioning. > > 2. run spamd > 3. run clamav > Aug 14 02:04:41 mail sm-mta[38464]: q7E64eCv038464: milter=clmilter, action=rcpt, continue > Aug 14 02:04:41 mail sm-mta[38464]: q7E64eCv038464: milter=clmilter, action=header, continue > Aug 14 02:04:41 mail lastmessage repeated 12 times > Aug 14 02:04:41 mail sm-mta[38464]: q7E64eCv038464: milter=clmilter, action=body, continue > Aug 14 02:04:42 mail sm-mta[38464]: q7E64eCv038464: Milter accept: message > Aug 14 02:04:42 mail sm-mta[38464]: q7E64eCv038464: --- 250 2.0.0 q7E64eCv038464 Message accepted for delivery > > spamd and clamav never execute. The above logfile entries appear to show that the milter interfae for clamav _is_ being invoked. Although nothing shows for 'spamassassin'. NOTE: your copy/paste of the .mc file, etc. *LOST* critical line-break formatting. I've had to _guess_ where breaks occured in ressurecting the files. There are 'dnl' verbs below that appear to have nothing after them. *IF* what appears below as a separate line following such a 'dnl' is actually on the same line with the dnl, then _that_ directive will *NOT* be acted on. YOU will have to double-check for that. > > # cat mail.neu.net.mc > divert(-1) > # > # Copyright (c) 1983 Eric P. Allman > # Copyright (c) 1988, 1993 > # The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > # > # > # > > # > # This is a generic configuration file for FreeBSD 6.X and later systems. > # If you want to customize it, copy it to a name appropriate for your > # environment and do the modifications there. > # > # The best documentation for this .mc file is: > # /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README or > # /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/cf/README > # > > divert(0) > VERSIONID(`$FreeBSD: release/9.0.0/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc 223068 2011-06-14 04:33:43Z gshapiro $') > OSTYPE(freebsd6) > DOMAIN(generic) > > FEATURE(access_db, `hash -o -T /etc/mail/access') > FEATURE(blacklist_recipients) > FEATURE(local_lmtp) > FEATURE(mailertable,`hash -o /etc/mail/mailertable') > FEATURE(virtusertable, `hash -o > /etc/mail/virtusertable') > > dnl Uncomment to allow relaying based on your MX records. > dnl NOTE: This can allow sites to use your server as a backup MX without > dnl your permission. > dnl FEATURE(relay_based_on_MX) > > dnl DNS based black hole lists > dnl -------------------------------- > dnl DNS based black hole lists come and go on a regular basis > dnl so this file will not serve as a database of the available servers. > dnl For that, visit > dnl http://www.google.com/Top/Computers/Internet/E-mail/Spam/Blacklists/ > > dnl Uncomment to activate your chosen DNS based blacklist > dnl FEATURE(dnsbl,`dnsbl.example.com') > dnl Alternatively, you can provide your own server and rejection message: > dnl FEATURE(dnsbl,`dnsbl.example.com',``"550 Mail from " $&{client_addr}" rejected'') > FEATURE(dnsbl,`sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org') > FEATURE(dnsbl,`bl.spamcop.net') > > > dnl Dialup users should uncomment and define this appropriately > dnl define(`SMART_HOST',`your.isp.mail.server') > > dnl Uncomment the first line to change the location of the default > dnl /etc/mail/local-host-names and comment out the second line. > dnl define(`confCW_FILE',`-o /etc/mail/sendmail.cw') > define(`confCW_FILE',`-o /etc/mail/local-host-names') > > INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clmilter',`S=local:/var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock,F=,T=S:4m;R:4m')dnl > INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamassassin',`S=local:/var/run/spamass-milter.sock,F=,T=C:15m;S:4m;R:4m;E:10m')dnl > define(`confINPUT_MAIL_FILTERS',`clmilter,spamassassin')dnl The 'dnl' at the end of the above lines is superfluous, and should be removed. > > dnl Enable for both IPv4 and IPv6 (optional) > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv4,Family=inet') > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv6,Family=inet6,Modifiers=O') > > define(`confBIND_OPTS',`WorkAroundBrokenAAAA') > define(`confNO_RCPT_ACTION',`add-to-undisclosed') > define(`confPRIVACY_FLAGS',`authwarnings,noexpn,novrfy') > MAILER(local) > MAILER(smtp) > > [root@mail /etc/mail]#ps -aux > root 1268 0.0 0.3 41200 2668 ?? Is 11:47PM 0:00.07 /usr/local/sbin/spamass-milter -f -p /var/run/spamass-milter.sock > root 1276 0.0 3.8 125724 39080 ?? Ss 11:47PM 0:02.85 /usr/local/bin/spamd -c -d -r /var/run/spamd/spamd.pid (perl) > root 1277 0.0 4.5 133916 45908 ?? I 11:47PM 0:07.54 spamd child (perl) > root 1278 0.0 3.7 125724 37996 ?? I 11:47PM 0:00.01 spamd child (perl) > clamav 1284 0.0 7.7 217948 79456 ?? Is 11:47PM 0:04.89 /usr/local/sbin/clamd > clamav 1290 0.0 0.2 27540 2328 ?? Is 11:47PM 0:00.08 /usr/local/sbin/clamav-milter -c /usr/local/etc/clamav-milter.conf > clamav 1296 0.0 0.2 45080 2312 ?? Is 11:47PM 0:03.12 /usr/local/bin/freshclam --daemon -p /var/run/clamav/freshclam.pid > > > Clamav was compiled with the milter enabled. Please let me know what > other info I can provide to help troubleshoot this, any help is > appreciated. You may want to run sendmail -- just long enough for it to process a few incoming messages -- with a higher level of debugging enabled. You'll need to see the sendmail documentation (or the 'bat' book) for details of an appropriate value for the '-D' switch to sendmail invocation. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 21:16:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FEB5106566B for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:16:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED5C8FC0A for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:16:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7ELFrpb020798; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:15:53 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q7ELFqet020795; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:15:53 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:15:52 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Polytropon In-Reply-To: <20120813134038.4c2afd8a.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: References: <20120813134038.4c2afd8a.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:15:53 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Ashkan Rahmani Subject: Re: Optimus vga on notebook X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:16:02 -0000 On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:10:57 +0430, Ashkan Rahmani wrote: >> Hello >> I have asus j52k core i5 notebook. its graphic card is optimus nvidia 310m. >> i'm using debian on it and work great. now I need to install freebsd 9. >> every things are great but vga. >> pciinfo shows my vga card is nvidia and company is Intel corp. >> vga resolution is not correct. it is 1024*768. >> xorg -configure and manual editing xorg.conf not work. >> ports/x11 driver / nvidial driver not work too. >> even as my last try i tried Intel driver and not work. >> i load nvidia module and linux module, > > The nVidia GeForce 310m should be supported. Have you tried > the x11/nvidia-driver? The problem with "Optimus" is that it has both Intel video and a third-party graphics adapter. There may be a BIOS option to disable one of the two; otherwise, these do not work with FreeBSD as far as I know. One option in that case would be to run FreeBSD in a VM. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 15 01:40:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357E5106566C for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 01:40:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eam1edward@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE568FC08 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 01:40:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so1841440obb.13 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:40:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RtPow8EVQ5Rj02CtI4tLiSyztOVvzA9FRimL5+JqyEE=; b=XpdBjJX/yJt7ijvNJf2CXcHUc+yZjYz/5vyGbP4ZTr6yrctRq2mj2eYNMNr0Cy0x/g mlfzMYfUDVpHkZKabpliH9yPV+ZwyEP+SBrygDvUSSAujqO5ex3L+InWkg5E0V14NvcM XlJEdkYlxN6UBsejHbtVEmoasnmPs5bn0JWYFw+hJhXyWTXfMS/KxqgkZpJYIhuNFVJQ APjopfFdKYu4pJKoCJYYurdpyIa0ROfnMN5KqLpFEOb+ZJbR7Nb8Fr9Q35kOaaqchLlz eqDbejhdsDsBc1VM0xL1GOv+auVNRvN1KJ0ZFq7i5hl3AWhbwXnBLPPY59qsj8BcVUCz pP4Q== Received: by 10.182.108.71 with SMTP id hi7mr22205719obb.21.1344994852949; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:40:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.103] ([174.134.109.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l10sm41271oeb.13.2012.08.14.18.40.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <502AFCF3.4080201@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:35:47 -0700 From: Edward M User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120806 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Kline References: <20120814045230.GA8454@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20120814045230.GA8454@thought.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: TRENDnet, which? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 01:40:54 -0000 Gary Kline wrote: > Well, it pays to check prices! the Avocent brand of KVM > are an arm and *three* legs. I have abs no use for anything > fancy. just want something to get me to boot status on > different boxes... a number of you suggested a kvm switch > with the brand "trendnet". > > anybody know which model? Well i'm using Tk-801r model. have not had any problems in the couple of years i've owned it. it can be rack monted if needed. http://trendnet.com/products/proddetail.asp?status=view&prod=165_TK-801R&cat=110 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 15 14:27:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC701065674 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from radek.krejca@starnet.cz) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz (exchange.mail.starnet.cz [92.62.224.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28BB8FC12 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::7534:a1f0:da0:e34d]) by EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::7534:a1f0:da0:e34d%15]) with mapi; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:21:09 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Radek_Krej=E8a?= To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:21:09 +0200 Thread-Topic: ZFS sharenfs problem Thread-Index: Ac168d581XApSvanTW+s1Hg4qpBokw== Message-ID: Accept-Language: cs-CZ Content-Language: cs-CZ X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: cs-CZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: ZFS sharenfs problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:27:03 -0000 Hello, after upgrade to fbsd 9.0 I dont know how to set sharenfs on zfs filesystem= correctly. On the older version of freebsd I used: zfs set sharenfs=3D-alldirs -maproot=3D0 pokus.starnet.cz storage/pokus on the same version of freebsd, but after uprade zfs zfs set sharenfs=3Drw=3D@pokus.starnet.cz,root=3D0 storage/pokus command ended fine, but on freebsd 9.0 I got with this command=20 Aug 14 12:26:48 storage mountd[1181]: bad exports list line /usr/local/stor= age/pokus rw=3D@pokus.starnet.cz root=3D0 So i found this page http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/821-1448/gayn= e.html and change command to zfs set share=3Dname=3Dstorage_pokus,path=3D/usr/local/storage/pokus,prot= =3Dnfs,anon=3D0,sec=3Dsys,rw=3D@pokus.starnet.cz storage/pokus and command crashes with cannot set property for 'storage/pokus': invalid property 'share' How is correct command for setting sharenfs (i gave sharenfs=3Don, but I ne= ed to restrict access)? Thank you very much. Radek From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 15 14:37:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD1D1065687 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:37:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8016C8FC1F for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so2982485obb.13 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:37:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=eDLVCAM+6JlpY7fGkC7iIa0fPtW3jryxd+U9ehhQPUc=; b=tJr+J7UnnQEs1uYRMnc3LBZOklnop+yrEv+oYx9ltjJN+p3zW/luRtyGL2EhwqWnCz Q1Hj2uZk0sWnFXspfBszqhQJJ3rQQ79jElbC5sXP5vchACosSBqPmp4xV7qnG6I/6y5s fIdcah8YUs6BFqxI3G3OiHGblLAhWAILncctLCjo/Ih7DJTdrSI7Y8qOfPzTxbk4sGGB QCkbuevkQ9ha1UphL03o3mN2fT76SvEo3JGB0JZZINK+PbbGn0xZBkzDIJvyYKJHkIhD rP/EQpR/6YaykedcBiy+8a9Y4RAO5uuz00nHvqPf+ppPooNAE/cSIAC7n7DLQrFdrk66 wxXA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.6.73 with SMTP id y9mr2043506oey.17.1345041449704; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:37:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.182.73.40 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:37:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:37:29 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: QR9Z-Et7WGv7q40ry1H3Z-raffc Message-ID: From: Rick Miller To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: vlan tagging in releng/8.3 not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:37:35 -0000 On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Rick Miller wrote: > Hi All, > > I am running the latest releng/8.3 on a HP DL360 with an Intel 82599 > 10G NIC using the ixgbe driver. Without vlan tagging, tcpdump sees > traffic on the default vlan. With vlan tagging there is no traffic on > the interface. Wondering if anyone else has seen similar and/or might > be able to provide some additional information? > > I'm not seeing anything in syslog. The interface is configured via rc.conf: > > cloned_interfaces="vlan0" > ifconfig_vlan0="inet 10.x.x.x netmask=255.255.255.0 vlan $id vlandev ix0" I was missing ifconfig_ix0="up" in rc.conf. After inserting this, it worked! -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 15 16:38:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4E1106564A for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:38:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bo-1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-BZ9BX@quest-mailer.com) Received: from 106-161.mta.dotmailer.com (106-161.mta.dotmailer.com [94.143.106.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823F68FC12 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:38:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=dm-key1; d=quest-mailer.com; h=From:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Date:List-Unsubscribe:Reply-To:Message-ID; i=horse@quest-mailer.com; bh=M+oqGXz1qHFa5Prg6cdyGobyfGw=; b=AhFim8WgWZlUcb2JL/ZzTAZspMlfjZp7qwCxVXx9jN/fmidLddVZPp22Ns+IZtmZhWhusMuDU6Er rG+qwsIsKQ== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=dm-key1; d=quest-mailer.com; b=KK1KL34I/OiGDNSsr2nso3RziLr3lJBGaNmoojefrgWhBI+sm1Lc2Xmq6BujRDx/iUf6c3xYYAUu czhHWHsvLw==; From: "HorseQuest USA" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: dmDroid Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:28:40 +0100 X-CampaignID: DKAPZ X-dmid: 1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6 Bounces-to: bo-1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-BZ9BX@quest-mailer.com Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: www.HorseQuest.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: HorseQuest USA List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:38:48 -0000 ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVW8-0/c.aspx ) E: enquiries@horsequest.com ( enquiries@horsequest.com ) W: HorseQuest.com ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVW8-0/c.as= px ) 15th August 2012 WOW! WHAT AN EXCITING OLYMPICS!! The last few weeks of competitions have been truly gripping to watch, wit= h the USA topping the medals chart with a remarkable 46 Gold, 29 Silver a= nd 29 Bronze totalling a whopping 104 medals! But before we all reluctantly pack away our bunting and flags we can turn= our attention towards the awe-inspiring Paralympics. >From Thursday the 30th of August through to Tuesday the 4th of September = 78 horse and rider combinations will take to the fantastic Greenwich Park= arena for another exciting dressage competition. Join us on Facebook ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVW9-0/c.= aspx ) for up to the minute news and results! For more information visit the Paralympic ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-= X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVWA-0/c.aspx ) site Next Stop: Paralympics! Did you know? Visually impaired riders are permitted to use callers to help them naviga= te around the arena. Norway's Ann Cecile Orr rode to a whistle on her way to winning two silve= r medals at Sydney 2000 =E2=80=93 she is totally blind. (Source: www.London2012.com) Welcome to HorseQuest USA, the exciting place to advertise... HorseQuest has been the leading equine sales site in the United Kingdom (= http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVWB-0/c.aspx ) for the last 1= 0 years and with HorseQuest Australia ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3= -759ZZ6-CUVWC-0/c.aspx ) and New Zealand ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X= 5R3-759ZZ6-CUVWD-0/c.aspx ) becoming the place to advertise in the Southe= rn Hemisphere, we are now delighted to announce the arrival or HorseQuest= USA ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVW8-0/c.aspx )! FREE ADVERTISING! To give you the chance to trial HorseQuest with no obligation or outlay, = log on now to HorseQuest.com ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-C= UVW8-0/c.aspx ) and place your advert free of charge!* (*limited period only) Advertise anything equestrian related =E2=80=93 Barn pages ( http://quest= -mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVWE-0/c.aspx ) available - All currently F= REE! Advertising is simple... ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVWF-0/c.aspx ) ( advertise@horsequest.com ) ONLINE ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVWF-0/c.aspx ) Via our easy to use online Step-by-Step process! Register HERE ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVWF-0/c.aspx )= EMAIL ( advertise@horsequest.com ) Simply email your advert and we will do the rest! advertise@horsequest.com ( advertise@horsequest.com ) Got a Question? Drop us an email and we will help in any way we can! enquiries@horsequest.com ( enquiries@horsequest.com?subject=3DGot%20a%20Q= uestion%3F ) ( enquiries@horsequest.com ) ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVW9-0/c.aspx ) Join us on Facebook for all the latest updates and competitions CURRENTLY ON HORSEQUEST... STAKATO FANCY HUNTER Hanoverian, Dapple grey, Gelding, 5 years, 16.3hh Will be the 3'6" winner!! Quiet with little to no prep to get to the show ring Beautiful mover and jumper, huge step, and no spook! READ MORE... ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVWG-0/c.aspx ) STUNNING LOW LEVEL EVENT PACKER! "DOUBLE RIVERS 2 COOL" Thoroughbred, Bright bay, Gelding, 11 years, 16.2hh "Heffe=E2=80=9D is a 2001 gelding who has competed successfully through t= he CCI 2-star level, and two times at NAJYRC He really knows his job and does it well Extremely fancy and well-broke on the flatVery uncomplicated and fun to j= ump!! READ MORE... ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVWH-0/c.aspx ) EYE CATCHING TRAKEHNER 3RD LEVEL DRESSAGE GELDING Trakehner, Grey, Gelding, 9 years Friedrich does 3rd level dressage and also does some jumping - He is a st= unning horse to look at and loves to pleaseHe is a very willing horse. Fr= ed is very friendly, sturdy and good looking. He is a head turner! Fred is 100% sound and requires no maintenance- no supplements, special s= hoeing, or injections READ MORE... ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVWI-0/c.aspx ) BIG MOVING OLDENBURG / TB FILLYCOMING 3 YEARS OLD, EXCELLENT HINDLEG Oldenburg, Chestnut, Filly, 3 years, 15.1 hands Fairy Tale is coming 3 years old 2012 Excellent gaits, very athletic fillyBy Furst Impression Suitable prospect for Dressage, eventing, jumpers etc READ MORE... ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVWJ-0/c.aspx ) 81 MAGNIFICENT ACRES WITH FABULOUS VIEWS Magnificent 81 acres of rolling hills with fabulous views - Historic 1830= stone farmhouse needing renovation - Build your dream house on the hill = and use farmhouse as tenant house, or if you are handy, remodel the farmh= ouse New well in 2007, water tested and septic serviced September 2010 Over 50 tillable acres, currently leased to local farmer READ MORE... ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVWK-0/c.aspx ) EXTREMELY FLASHY NEAR LEOPARD KNABSTRUPPER COLT Warmblood, Colt, 16.1 hands Knabstrupper 2012-6/16 bay near leopard colt with 4 white socks and a bla= ze By Knabstrupper Colorado Skrodstrup and out of BWP Select mare Fascinatio= n ES, this combination promises talent, beauty and ridability Substantial colt is beautifully balanced and has the jaw dropping WOW fac= tor sure to get you noticed READ MORE... ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVWL-0/c.aspx ) COUNTY CONNECTION DRESSAGE SADDLEHARD TO FIND NARROW WIDTH County Connection dressage saddle: 2005, 18", narrow tree with skid row p= anels This lovely saddle is in great conditionIt originally had point billets, = which the County representative repositioned as regularbillets at my requ= est You can have your saddler easily return them to the point billet placing = if you prefer READ MORE... ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVWM-0/c.aspx ) PRE RIDDEN HORSE Andalusian / PRE, Grey, Gelding, 5 years, 15.3 hands PRE ridden horse, full papers, directly from the breeder for sale Well ridden, stable and easy to ride Very functional, skills for dressage For amateur or competition READ MORE... ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVWN-0/c.aspx ) CAMPINA GRANDE Dutch Warmblood, Grey, Mare, 6 years Fantastic eye-catcher! Lovely mare of great pedigree ready to win 130 cla= sses! Suitable for any amateur, brave, easy going - Good vet check More than 40 other horses for sale on our web site: www.exclusive-horses.eu!! READ MORE... ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVWO-0/c.aspx ) ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVW8-0/c.aspx ) Circulate your advert internationally by displaying it on our successful = sister sites as well. Please email us ( enquiries@horsequest.com ) for more details... ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVWB-0/c.aspx ) ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVWC-0/c.aspx ) ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVWD-0/c.aspx ) ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVW8-0/c.aspx ) ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVW9-0/c.aspx ) HorseQuest.com 2333 Alexandria Drive Lexington KY 40504 Visit: HorseQuest.com ( http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-759ZZ6-CUVW8-0/= c.aspx ) Email: enquiries@horsequest.com ( enquiries@horsequest.com ) Unsubscribe from this newsletter http://quest-mailer.com/1E0G-X5R3-CD759Z= Z6FD/uns.aspx From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 15 18:17:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F5A106564A for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:17:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward6.mail.yandex.net (unknown [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:202:22cf:30ff:fe6b:6ebc]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC09D8FC14 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:17:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp6.mail.yandex.net (smtp6.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.56]) by forward6.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 605F41122BA0; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:17:57 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp6.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 3F0AF1640338; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:17:57 +0400 (MSK) Received: from unknown (unknown [77.93.52.20]) by smtp6.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id Hur8Le9T-HurSBxLO; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:17:57 +0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1345054677; bh=2+XsFO0IDqZL6+rWOxYQQuRKNRSWc6TTOTKy8UtKH14=; h=Date:From:X-Mailer:Reply-To:Organization:X-Priority:Message-ID:To: CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=F/K2YJo5wmXZg3puakyn2JoJXLO8hKGFXe5xN6Izolx5JZoNfsLfaCk8AwYuM/ksJ oAYkUHHQN7Ik01KX+i5CsxtIOW7krDxlDLQSYjaelZ4R2a26HFAx3iOiEU3GKd89D2 ZTyMwKVKTF6GL5bN6qozC2QbISAM1jYVaumVGEjo= Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:17:52 +0300 From: Eugen Konkov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: ISP FreeLine X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1207405505.20120815211752@yandex.ru> To: Rick Miller In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re[2]: vlan tagging in releng/8.3 not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eugen Konkov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:17:59 -0000 RM> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Rick Miller RM> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I am running the latest releng/8.3 on a HP DL360 with an Intel 82599 >> 10G NIC using the ixgbe driver. Without vlan tagging, tcpdump sees >> traffic on the default vlan. With vlan tagging there is no traffic on >> the interface. Wondering if anyone else has seen similar and/or might >> be able to provide some additional information? >> >> I'm not seeing anything in syslog. The interface is configured via rc.conf: >> >> cloned_interfaces="vlan0" >> ifconfig_vlan0="inet 10.x.x.x netmask=255.255.255.0 vlan $id vlandev ix0" RM> I was missing ifconfig_ix0="up" in rc.conf. After inserting this, it worked! that is old bug of FreeBSD: interfaces do not auto up if there is only vlan interfaces From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 00:12:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0C5106566C for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:12:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7588FC08 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:12:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaak11 with SMTP id k11so669939eaa.13 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:12:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=gbohTpgqvCbnnUxOmskfJzwPgb8EAN1A1Ty2dDSYRqA=; b=OBlz+4o5R13bpzlGZBcQeOp/fhmuh6oKslINTp8WP+FEhluSurzlVNcclmtVfdFlpr 3BcN8O/90elyNlckCPZmNoNFMDuj6QZfSKwot4G1pViu7IIcFM8BvAIymjTKxgW4l0Ec Z+T+RKc+kfg+zvMthpE/F9GUNChawYSGez3hGyxuoweymqxAYCKb41tuiAmrCk/7UWeU MASbJNfaX2EUJGks4/481StdZR/QMAiI2I2kEtbKlPota211quV9KHJSXs3rwv9AQt4g f4FEsGMU6dCCYtv75fcMZyjqv0RY08n7llh2YQEsqPfTgAyWln8KnyPryXTirKjfuo46 EfMQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.4.201 with SMTP id 49mr16968788eej.0.1345075931532; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:12:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.214.131 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:12:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1207405505.20120815211752@yandex.ru> References: <1207405505.20120815211752@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:12:11 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: Re[2]: vlan tagging in releng/8.3 not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:12:13 -0000 On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Eugen Konkov wrote: > > RM> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Rick Miller > RM> wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I am running the latest releng/8.3 on a HP DL360 with an Intel 82599 >>> 10G NIC using the ixgbe driver. Without vlan tagging, tcpdump sees >>> traffic on the default vlan. With vlan tagging there is no traffic on >>> the interface. Wondering if anyone else has seen similar and/or might >>> be able to provide some additional information? >>> >>> I'm not seeing anything in syslog. The interface is configured via rc.conf: >>> >>> cloned_interfaces="vlan0" >>> ifconfig_vlan0="inet 10.x.x.x netmask=255.255.255.0 vlan $id vlandev ix0" > > RM> I was missing ifconfig_ix0="up" in rc.conf. After inserting this, it worked! > > that is old bug of FreeBSD: interfaces do not auto up if there is only > vlan interfaces >From my experience, such a line is also required if they are detected by the OS but otherwise unconfigured with an IP address. I've had to do this machines that have multiple NICs, where one or more is un-numbered but used for monitoring, such as when running ntop and monitoring a switch via the span/mirror port connected to the un-numbered NIC. Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 01:59:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1859106564A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 01:59:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesp@musicreports.com) Received: from mri-mail.musicreports.com (mri-mail.musicreports.com [38.98.50.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72FC88FC08 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 01:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mri-mail.musicreports.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81595688047 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:59:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mri-mail.musicreports.com Received: from mri-mail.musicreports.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mri-mail.musicreports.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zaw4Vw4anEOM for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:59:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mri-mail.musicreports.com (mri-mail.musicreports.com [192.168.20.65]) by mri-mail.musicreports.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6735688044 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:59:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:59:53 -0700 (PDT) From: "James D. Parra" To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <438406572.84878.1345082392987.JavaMail.root@mri-mail> In-Reply-To: <1733922939.84736.1345073516598.JavaMail.root@mri-mail> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [192.168.20.220] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.15_GA_2995 (ZimbraWebClient - SAF3 (Win)/6.0.15_GA_2995) Cc: Subject: can't build Samba 35 on FreeBSD 9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 01:59:55 -0000 Hello, I am trying to install Samba35 on FreeBSD 9.0 but I keep getting a build error. portsnap extract && portsnap fetch update cd /usr/ports/devel/libtool && make deinstall && make install clean cd /usr/ports/security/krb5 && make deinstall make KRB5_HOME=/usr/local install clean and finally; cd /usr/ports/net/samba35 && make KRB5_HOME=/usr/local install clean With my fingers crossed I hoped for the best and yet I received the following error during compiling; Compiling libsmb/libsmb_setget.c libsmb/libsmb_setget.c: In function 'smbc_getOptionUseCCache': libsmb/libsmb_setget.c:427: error: 'SMB_CTX_FLAG_USE_CCACHE' undeclared (first use in this function) libsmb/libsmb_setget.c:427: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once libsmb/libsmb_setget.c:427: error: for each function it appears in.) libsmb/libsmb_setget.c: In function 'smbc_setOptionUseCCache': libsmb/libsmb_setget.c:435: error: 'SMB_CTX_FLAG_USE_CCACHE' undeclared (first use in this function) The following command failed: cc -I/usr/local/include -O2 -pipe -DLDAP_DEPRECATED -fno-strict-aliasing -I. -I/usr/ports/net/samba35/work/samba-3.5.15/source3 -I/usr/ports/net/samba35/work/samba-3.5.15/source3/iniparser/src -Iinclude -I./include -I. -I. -I./../lib/replace -I./../lib/tevent -I./libaddns -I./librpc -I./.. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -Iinclude -I./include -I. -I. -I./../lib/replace -I./../lib/tevent -I./libaddns -I./librpc -I./.. -I./../lib/popt -I/usr/local/include -DLDAP_DEPRECATED -I/usr/ports/net/samba35/work/samba-3.5.15/source3/lib -I.. -I../source4 -D_SAMBA_BUILD_=3 -D_SAMBA_BUILD_=3 -fPIC -DPIC -c libsmb/libsmb_setget.c -o libsmb/libsmb_setget.o gmake: *** [libsmb/libsmb_setget.o] Error 1 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/samba35. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/samba35. Does anyone have any solutions on how I can get Samba installed and resolve the above error? Many thanks in advance. James From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 05:11:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705D1106564A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 05:11:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ah@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB568FC0A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 05:11:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q7G4jmv1096651 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:45:48 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ah@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <502C7AFB.2020303@dreamchaser.org> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:45:47 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:45:48 -0600 (MDT) Subject: 9.0 release hang in quiescent X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 05:11:01 -0000 I've been struggling trying to ignore something and it refuses to go away :-(. Running 9.0 release on an amd 64 box, standard kernel, 16GB, SSD (/, /usr, /var, /tmp) + HDDs, visiontek 900331 graphics card (ati radeon hd5550). As long as I am using the system, things seem to be fine. However, when I leave the system idle for an extended period of time (e.g. overnight, out for the day, etc.), it often refuses to return from whatever state it is in. The screen is blank and in standby for power saving, and Fn won't get me a console prompt. The only way I know to recover is to power off and reboot. When this first happened, the file systems would come up trashed and I needed to manually fsck everything. I've gotten in the habit of doing a sync prior to leaving the system, and they now seem to come up clean when I have to reboot, but that's obviously not a solution to the problem. Xorg.0.log shows the following errors: (EE) RADEON(0): Acceleration initialization failed However, the display works fine and I'm assuming I'm just getting slow rendering, which is ok in this case. Can someone suggest a good way to proceed to figure out what's going on? Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 05:45:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6F3106566B for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 05:45:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.t@mail.com) Received: from mailout-us.mail.com (mailout-us.mail.com [74.208.122.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08C128FC14 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 05:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2012 05:45:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO blazon-pc.runningwild.local) [78.84.105.231] by mail.gmx.com (mp-us009) with SMTP; 16 Aug 2012 01:45:18 -0400 X-Authenticated: #76218138 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19FbzwsJcBF56HdqqHGhlLClqQPTlu7K3n9nl/NQR yD8qKBm6KbHH47 Message-ID: <502C88ED.4070804@mail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:45:17 +0300 From: Jeff Tipton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <438406572.84878.1345082392987.JavaMail.root@mri-mail> In-Reply-To: <438406572.84878.1345082392987.JavaMail.root@mri-mail> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: can't build Samba 35 on FreeBSD 9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 05:45:26 -0000 On 08/16/2012 04:59, James D. Parra wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to install Samba35 on FreeBSD 9.0 but I keep getting a build error. > > portsnap extract&& portsnap fetch update > cd /usr/ports/devel/libtool&& make deinstall&& make install clean > cd /usr/ports/security/krb5&& make deinstall > make KRB5_HOME=/usr/local install clean > > and finally; > cd /usr/ports/net/samba35&& make KRB5_HOME=/usr/local install clean > > With my fingers crossed I hoped for the best and yet I received the following error during compiling; > > > Compiling libsmb/libsmb_setget.c > libsmb/libsmb_setget.c: In function 'smbc_getOptionUseCCache': > libsmb/libsmb_setget.c:427: error: 'SMB_CTX_FLAG_USE_CCACHE' undeclared (first use in this function) > libsmb/libsmb_setget.c:427: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > libsmb/libsmb_setget.c:427: error: for each function it appears in.) > libsmb/libsmb_setget.c: In function 'smbc_setOptionUseCCache': > libsmb/libsmb_setget.c:435: error: 'SMB_CTX_FLAG_USE_CCACHE' undeclared (first use in this function) > The following command failed: > cc -I/usr/local/include -O2 -pipe -DLDAP_DEPRECATED -fno-strict-aliasing -I. -I/usr/ports/net/samba35/work/samba-3.5.15/source3 -I/usr/ports/net/samba35/work/samba-3.5.15/source3/iniparser/src -Iinclude -I./include -I. -I. -I./../lib/replace -I./../lib/tevent -I./libaddns -I./librpc -I./.. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -Iinclude -I./include -I. -I. -I./../lib/replace -I./../lib/tevent -I./libaddns -I./librpc -I./.. -I./../lib/popt -I/usr/local/include -DLDAP_DEPRECATED -I/usr/ports/net/samba35/work/samba-3.5.15/source3/lib -I.. -I../source4 -D_SAMBA_BUILD_=3 -D_SAMBA_BUILD_=3 -fPIC -DPIC -c libsmb/libsmb_setget.c -o libsmb/libsmb_setget.o > gmake: *** [libsmb/libsmb_setget.o] Error 1 > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/net/samba35. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/net/samba35. > > > > Does anyone have any solutions on how I can get Samba installed and resolve the above error? > > Many thanks in advance. > > > James > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Did you already have a ports tree? If so, you only needed to #portsnap fetch update By "portsnap extract" you are overwriting the existing ports tree, not updating. And I don't think it's a good idea to "make deinstall" from the ports tree other than the one from which you did "make install". Better use pkg_delete (add -f, if it doesn't want to remove the package/port). You may now have leftover from the older installation (say, some libraries). And you reinstalled libtool this way, which is invoked when building libraries. I would first make sure there are no leftovers, all the dependencies are up to date, and then deal with the build problem (if it still exists). And why do you set KRB5_HOME? Will you have kerberos? -Jeff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 05:59:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AF4106566B for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 05:59:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C051B8FC0A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 05:59:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so4236457obb.13 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:59:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=zi4GP+iJKlytbM/0hwyiCYXtVBFkxLl0WZd/TWYdq7c=; b=YBu28JdxHpHN7THnelyNlvqO9tAaJXg5UOViIC73I/5/GbtTgeVz10hhdNOdpj+szZ /0Ki2FhPygExAw2Kf+WOvszfLn8Vu256CjZMMCdqYdqDk36sNjWXfvGf5vaMmMvnxnuf O6MLJslJ6/cCIA+AEeD6tfnDvJP/RH/gy+8zC9qwCx6/uy/k4K0iU4jfRog7PJfLAMLj tIhqiw6O7bTLj8YVDSyr6HvD0nQ61/2G+bGSVTKJN4Mx2ovX8ulwK7aGLaoz9fBtmkMq woXEsNuV+IgLykIGUssbcjYIB6bQws4xUfuDuPj7/pK9L7ukDn5FUwTQEDxpFHPc0zgO Ff1w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.44.6 with SMTP id a6mr3767449obm.91.1345096745023; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:59:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.83.130 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:59:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <438406572.84878.1345082392987.JavaMail.root@mri-mail> References: <1733922939.84736.1345073516598.JavaMail.root@mri-mail> <438406572.84878.1345082392987.JavaMail.root@mri-mail> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:59:04 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: "James D. Parra" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't build Samba 35 on FreeBSD 9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 05:59:06 -0000 On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:59 PM, James D. Parra wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to install Samba35 on FreeBSD 9.0 but I keep getting a build > error. > The text you gave us gives me the thought you are flailing in the dark. First off, use a port management tool eg portmaster. Learn how to use it fully including regularly reading /usr/ports/UPDATING The handbook has great information on managing ports, I suggest reading it closely if you want FreeBSD to be your friend. In this scenario, you would use portsnap fetch update(assuming you've once a portsnap extract once before) portmaster /usr/ports/net/samba35 The specific error in your message indicates some problem with ccache. What does your /etc/make.conf look like? -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 06:05:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373201065672 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 06:05:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87CD8FC0C for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 06:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (host86-180-66-20.range86-180.btcentralplus.com [86.180.66.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7G64uD8065836 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:04:56 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q7G64uD8065836 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q7G64uD8065836; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host host86-180-66-20.range86-180.btcentralplus.com [86.180.66.20] claimed to be seedling.black-earth.co.uk Message-ID: <502C8D88.9040901@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:04:56 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <502C7AFB.2020303@dreamchaser.org> In-Reply-To: <502C7AFB.2020303@dreamchaser.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigEBBD11865E3E61428739CEA2" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RDNS_DYNAMIC, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Subject: Re: 9.0 release hang in quiescent X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 06:05:01 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigEBBD11865E3E61428739CEA2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 16/08/2012 05:45, Gary Aitken wrote: > I've been struggling trying to ignore something and it refuses to go > away :-(. >=20 > Running 9.0 release on an amd 64 box, standard kernel, 16GB, SSD (/, > /usr, /var, /tmp) + HDDs, visiontek 900331 graphics card (ati radeon > hd5550). >=20 > As long as I am using the system, things seem to be fine. However, > when I leave the system idle for an extended period of time (e.g. > overnight, out for the day, etc.), it often refuses to return from > whatever state it is in. The screen is blank and in standby for > power saving, and Fn won't get me a console prompt. The > only way I know to recover is to power off and reboot. >=20 > When this first happened, the file systems would come up trashed and > I needed to manually fsck everything. I've gotten in the habit of > doing a sync prior to leaving the system, and they now seem to come > up clean when I have to reboot, but that's obviously not a solution > to the problem. >=20 > Xorg.0.log shows the following errors: (EE) RADEON(0): Acceleration > initialization failed However, the display works fine and I'm > assuming I'm just getting slow rendering, which is ok in this case. >=20 > Can someone suggest a good way to proceed to figure out what's going > on? Can you get network access to the machine when it gets into this state? If you can't, that suggests the OS is hanging or crashing, possibly in response to going into some sort of power-saving mode. If you can get in, then there are many more possibilities. Firstly, you should be able to kill and restart the X server, which might get your display back without rebooting. Or else you could shutdown and reboot cleanly. As to working out what the underlying cause of the problem is: that's harder. I'd try experimenting with the power saving settings for your graphics display. If you can turn them off as a test, and the machine then survives for an extended period of idleness, you'll have gone a long way towards isolating the problem. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigEBBD11865E3E61428739CEA2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlAsjYgACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyieACeMYfl68A5rFV2SqyWw5lcGlZK L1kAnA95j7EthTanUG1imWlA7TgFdyfv =bMCx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigEBBD11865E3E61428739CEA2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 06:21:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A27B106564A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 06:21:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (relay01a.mail.uk1.eechost.net [217.69.40.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCFD8FC17 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 06:21:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=rpi-1.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1t9a-0001qu-Rp for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:01:58 +0100 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by rpi-1.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1tEC-0007aQ-3j for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:06:44 +0100 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:06:24 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20120816070624.d876f75e.steve@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <502C7AFB.2020303@dreamchaser.org> References: <502C7AFB.2020303@dreamchaser.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.3 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) X-Face: %]+HVL}K`P8>+8ZcY-WGHP6j@&mxMo9JH6_WdgIgUGH)JX/usO0%jy7T~IVgqjumD^OBqX, Kv^-GM6mlw(fI^$"QRKyZ$?xx/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain) Subject: Re: 9.0 release hang in quiescent X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 06:21:27 -0000 On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:45:47 -0600 Gary Aitken wrote: > I've been struggling trying to ignore something and it refuses to go > away :-(. > > Running 9.0 release on an amd 64 box, standard kernel, 16GB, SSD > (/, /usr, /var, /tmp) + HDDs, visiontek 900331 graphics card (ati radeon > hd5550). > > As long as I am using the system, things seem to be fine. However, when > I leave the system idle for an extended period of time (e.g. overnight, > out for the day, etc.), it often refuses to return from whatever state it > is in. The screen is blank and in standby for power saving, and > Fn won't get me a console prompt. The only way I know to > recover is to power off and reboot. Are you running any kind of screensaver ? > Xorg.0.log shows the following errors: > (EE) RADEON(0): Acceleration initialization failed > However, the display works fine and I'm assuming I'm just getting slow > rendering, which is ok in this case. Sometimes the OpenGL screen saver modules crash without proper hardware support. If you're running a screensaver try disabling it and just using display blanking. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays C:>WIN | A better way to focus the sun The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 09:33:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8621065672 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:33:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.165]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237A18FC12 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.42.133] (helo=smtp2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1wSB-0000w4-Ry for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:33:23 +0200 Received: from 5419839c.cm-5-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([84.25.131.156] helo=ra.egypt.nl) by smtp2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1wSB-00042v-Jr for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:33:23 +0200 Received: from mbp.egypt.nl (mbp.egypt.nl [192.168.13.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ra.egypt.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DDEC3983E for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:33:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Boosten Message-Id: <84ED3B95-5A7D-4C2A-AC35-B54DFA8BFDF1@boosten.org> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:33:22 +0200 To: Questions FreeBSD Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1485\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1485) X-Ziggo-spambar: ---- X-Ziggo-spamscore: -4.9 X-Ziggo-spamreport: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PROLO_TRUST_RDNS=-3, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_PASS=-0.001 X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Blender port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:33:31 -0000 Hi All, I've installed Blender from the ports, and it compiled fine, without any = error. However, when I start Blender (even just with a -v for version info), it = core dumps. So I did a ktrace, and it seems to stumble on a library it cannot find: = libirml.so This library however is nowhere to be found on my system, nor in the = ports repository. Does anyone know what this library is for, and where would I find that = library? --=20 Peter Boosten From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 10:12:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AFB1106564A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:12:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from radek.krejca@starnet.cz) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz (exchange.mail.starnet.cz [92.62.224.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2EC8FC0C for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:12:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::7534:a1f0:da0:e34d]) by EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::7534:a1f0:da0:e34d%15]) with mapi; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:07:21 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Radek_Krej=E8a?= To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:07:20 +0200 Thread-Topic: ZFS sharenfs problem - bug? Thread-Index: Ac168d581XApSvanTW+s1Hg4qpBokwApLY8w Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: cs-CZ Content-Language: cs-CZ X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: cs-CZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: ZFS sharenfs problem - bug? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:12:05 -0000 Hi again, I take example line from manual: zfs set sharenfs=3D'rw=3D@123.123.0.0/16,root=3Dneo' tank/home modify it to: zfs set sharenfs=3D'rw=3D@pokus.starnet.cz,root=3D0' storage/pokus and I got in messagess Aug 16 12:04:45 storage mountd[1180]: can't get address info for host rw=3D= @pokus.starnet.cz Aug 16 12:04:45 storage mountd[1180]: bad host rw=3D@pokus.starnet.cz, skip= ping Aug 16 12:04:45 storage mountd[1180]: can't get address info for host root= =3D0 Aug 16 12:04:45 storage mountd[1180]: bad host root=3D0, skipping Aug 16 12:04:45 storage mountd[1180]: bad exports list line /usr/local/stor= age/pokus rw=3D@pokus.starnet.cz root=3D0 my /etc/zfs/exports # !!! DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE MANUALLY !!! /usr/local/storage/pokus rw=3D@pokus.starnet.cz root=3D0 ..... pokus.starnet.cz is in dns (reversible dns too), if I use IP address, the s= ituation is the same. zfs get shows: storage/pokus sharenfs rw=3D@pokus.starnet.cz,root=3D0 = local storage/pokus version 5 - uname: FreeBSD storage.starnet.cz 9.0-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p4 #2: Sat Au= g 11 17:48:50 CEST 2012 root@storage.starnet.cz:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GE= NERIC amd64 Where could be a problem? Is it bug or I am wrong but I dont see any mistak= e.... Thank you Radek From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 10:16:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0290D106564A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:16:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.bedin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9E68FC0A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbgb22 with SMTP id gb22so2937017vcb.13 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:16:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2VMG4+DbAvFh29HqM974p0Ljyyq+vxRyxrie+uzCWHc=; b=aw40Cts88g6tPh8JioA+AOmTzmbp2gdZJ1u1voKqIASZCzYUijZWEnVp9wYz5U7U7f rXFrSahWdP+4iiEvxxFAXJ95TZkH4CE4mPLHDEUkQGgkhroRKAuaPkuk7eNQudzs1Jg3 2aVT9J5fNZ1C5/MdWc/C4tx/cjWVCuhkSSCuBHxO9icrmMmx9pWVxSP5TSNYaSGW6LiK iQoK151nRqXJwI93otqiyuFFVDTJQAUZeM6BYtGoFO8tWr56pZdp5A4yVXi6w1x6EGC3 2vg25vGY2wlyoevpv7GIoctKjussENx80dbTXvkEWhkFNWYvQaYS6xH8lYUedJNBS4QL wGOA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.37.73 with SMTP id w9mr248749vdj.34.1345112216181; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:16:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.26.134 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:16:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:16:56 +0400 Message-ID: From: Michael Bedin To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Listing in http://www.ro.freebsd.org/gallery/pgallery.html X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:16:57 -0000 Hello, I would like to ask you to remove link to 'niga.ru' web site from the listing (in the subject). Now this domain does not belong me. Thank you. -- With best regards, Mikhail U. Bedin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 10:29:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AD5A1065672 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:29:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00D28FC12 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:29:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-32-97.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.32.97]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618DE2797F; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:29:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7GATU1X008932; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:29:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:29:27 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Peter Boosten Message-Id: <20120816122927.ff452986.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <84ED3B95-5A7D-4C2A-AC35-B54DFA8BFDF1@boosten.org> References: <84ED3B95-5A7D-4C2A-AC35-B54DFA8BFDF1@boosten.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Questions FreeBSD Subject: Re: Blender port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:29:39 -0000 On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:33:22 +0200, Peter Boosten wrote: > So I did a ktrace, and it seems to stumble on a library it cannot find: libirml.so > This library however is nowhere to be found on my system, nor in the ports repository. > > Does anyone know what this library is for, and where would I find that library? IRML - it seems to be the "Intel Resource Management Layer library. It is a work dispatcher used by Threading Building Blocks (TBB)." The tbb port (devel/tbb) however does not contain it. No port seems to mention it in its pkg-plist file. The google search results are very disillusioning, even more than the "typical Linuxisms" that sometimes hits a FreeBSD port... ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 11:14:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E9A1065674 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:14:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from radek.krejca@starnet.cz) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz (exchange.mail.starnet.cz [92.62.224.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7ED8FC12 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::7534:a1f0:da0:e34d]) by EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::7534:a1f0:da0:e34d%15]) with mapi; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:09:16 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Radek_Krej=E8a?= To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:09:15 +0200 Thread-Topic: ZFS sharenfs problem - solved, documentation bug Thread-Index: Ac168d581XApSvanTW+s1Hg4qpBokwApLY8wAAJNFlA= Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: cs-CZ Content-Language: cs-CZ X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: cs-CZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: ZFS sharenfs problem - solved, documentation bug X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:14:01 -0000 Hi again, > I take example line from manual: >=20 > zfs set sharenfs=3D'rw=3D@123.123.0.0/16,root=3Dneo' tank/home >=20 > modify it to: >=20 > zfs set sharenfs=3D'rw=3D@pokus.starnet.cz,root=3D0' storage/pokus >=20 > Where could be a problem? Is it bug or I am wrong but I dont see any > mistake.... >=20 I found solution finally on the web (and I lost week with finding solution = :-(()=20 zfs sharenfs=3D"-maproot=3D0:0 pokus.starnet.cz" storage/pokus This command works but there is mistake in documentation... Radek From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 11:22:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63D0106566B for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:22:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564C28FC0C for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBCD45.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.205.69]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q7GBM4Sf069112; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:22:05 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q7GBLquA088202; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:21:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7GBLe8I053816; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:21:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201208161121.q7GBLe8I053816@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Michael Bedin From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:16:56 +0400." Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:21:40 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Listing in http://www.ro.freebsd.org/gallery/pgallery.html X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:22:13 -0000 Hi, Reference: > From: Michael Bedin > Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:16:56 +0400 > Message-id: Michael Bedin wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to ask you to remove link to 'niga.ru' web site from the > listing (in the subject). Now this domain does not belong me. This list is wrong address, I & most others on this list cant do that for you. To get it done, you need to us either: command send-pr or use bug report interface http://www.freebsd.org/support/bugreports.html clickable from http://www.freebsd.org so it gets noted permanently, so the right people see your request & act on it . Specify category as www. > Thank you. > > -- > With best regards, > Mikhail U. Bedin Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from Yahoo & Hotmail to be dumped @Berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 15:32:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75D010656A4; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:32:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10D08FC0C; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:32:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1T223l-0004qc-7e>; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:32:33 +0200 Received: from munin.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.110]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1T223l-0003QR-54>; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:32:33 +0200 Message-ID: <502D12C0.2060405@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:33:20 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." Organization: FU Berlin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120727 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Current , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.110 Cc: Subject: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:32:40 -0000 I ran into a very delicate and nasty situation. On several boxes, FreeBSD 9.1-PRE and FreeBSD 10-CURRENT (build of CURRENT sources from yesterday, r239295 Wed August 15 17:04:51 CEST 2012 amd64, I had to recompile all requirements of port Apache22, since after the port update it core dumped. On FreeBSD 9.1-PRE, with pkg(ng), things went well. Recompilation and installation of all "portmaster -f apache-2.2" requirements went perfect. On both FreeBSD 10-CURRENT boxes it ended up in a mess, all of a sudden(!), while reinstalling port security/cyrus-sasl2, things started to fail in a dramatik way! On both FBSD 10 boxes, the installation of the port security/cyrus-sasl2 got corrupted by "install" and/or "mtree" dumping core and signalling SIGNAL 11. Booting into multiuser mode is impossible, login core dumps SIGNAL 11, many other daemons, too. The only way is to boot into single user mode. An installation failed due to pkg(ng) was missing libarchive.so via portmaster or via core dumping install(1). By installing on one box, my home box, port security/cyrus-sasl2 manually, luckily install(1) and mtree(1) didn't coredump and it worked - and this precedure rescued me. But on my lab's development box, it doesn't work! On this specific box, where this nasty problem also occured the same way by simply recompiling everything for port www/apache22, including the reinstallation of port security/cyrus-sasl2. Nearly every binary is suddenly coredumping (as on the home box). login, vi, install, devfs, syslogd, mtree, id, find ... a whole lot of binaries seem to be compromised by something I do not see (libsasl2.so perhaps?). I tried to help myself via copying /rescue/vi to /usr/bin/vi to have at least a working vi. But in /rescue, I can not find install or mtree. I'm not familiar with the sophisticated ways of /rescue. Where are install(1) and mtree(1)? Trying to reinstall security/cyrus-sasl2 from single-user fails due install coredumps. pkg(ng) fails due to missing libpkg.so.5 and even rejects being reinstalled. But /usr/local/lib/libpkg.so.0 is even there! Disabling the use of pkg with commenting out WITH_PKGNG=yes in /etc/make.conf leads to the above issues with mtree and install. Disabling this pkgng tag leads to reinstallation of missing packages, which are store in the pkgng sqlite format and not as ASCII anymore, but then I get /var/runld-elf.so.hints: No such file or directory Error: shared library "iconv.3" does not exist. But most of the libs have never been touch! So what is the loader complaining about? Well, I'm floating like a dead man in the water and I'm glad that one box survided although suffering from the same symptomes. I tried to find rescue images and a rescue DVD of a snap shot server, but there is no way to crawl through the informations on the web pages towards a snapshot. All folders end up in 2011 and highly outdated (www.freebsd.org, I didn't look at mirrors since I thought the main server carries the most recent stuff). This isn't funny. No lead, no hint, even in the download section. If someone has some hints how to recompile the sources with an emergency booted disk, I highly appreciate some desater advice. Maybe the release of FreeBSD-10-CURRENT sources I compiled do have accidentally a nasty bug, so it would be nice to update the sources and have a complete recompilation done. Thanks in advance, oh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 15:44:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92094106564A; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:44:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onyx.glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:c200::face]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1148FC16; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (75-146-225-65-Philadelphia.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [75.146.225.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by onyx.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5253A23F3D4; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:44:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:44:24 -0400 From: Glen Barber To: "Hartmann, O." Message-ID: <20120816154424.GE1303@glenbarber.us> References: <502D12C0.2060405@zedat.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <502D12C0.2060405@zedat.fu-berlin.de> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD Current , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:44:27 -0000 On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:33:20PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > > I ran into a very delicate and nasty situation. > > On several boxes, FreeBSD 9.1-PRE and FreeBSD 10-CURRENT (build of > CURRENT sources from yesterday, r239295 Wed August 15 17:04:51 CEST 2012 > amd64, I had to recompile all requirements of port Apache22, since after > the port update it core dumped. > > On FreeBSD 9.1-PRE, with pkg(ng), things went well. Recompilation and > installation of all "portmaster -f apache-2.2" requirements went perfect. > > On both FreeBSD 10-CURRENT boxes it ended up in a mess, all of a > sudden(!), while reinstalling port security/cyrus-sasl2, things started > to fail in a dramatik way! > > On both FBSD 10 boxes, the installation of the port security/cyrus-sasl2 > got corrupted by "install" and/or "mtree" dumping core and signalling > SIGNAL 11. Booting into multiuser mode is impossible, login core dumps > SIGNAL 11, many other daemons, too. The only way is to boot into single > user mode. > > An installation failed due to pkg(ng) was missing libarchive.so via There is pkg-static for recovering in this type of situation. > portmaster or via core dumping install(1). By installing on one box, my > home box, port security/cyrus-sasl2 manually, luckily install(1) and > mtree(1) didn't coredump and it worked - and this precedure rescued me. > But on my lab's development box, it doesn't work! > > On this specific box, where this nasty problem also occured the same way > by simply recompiling everything for port www/apache22, including the > reinstallation of port security/cyrus-sasl2. Nearly every binary is > suddenly coredumping (as on the home box). login, vi, install, devfs, > syslogd, mtree, id, find ... a whole lot of binaries seem to be > compromised by something I do not see (libsasl2.so perhaps?). > > I tried to help myself via copying /rescue/vi to /usr/bin/vi to have at > least a working vi. But in /rescue, I can not find install or mtree. I'm > not familiar with the sophisticated ways of /rescue. Where are > install(1) and mtree(1)? > > Trying to reinstall security/cyrus-sasl2 from single-user fails due > install coredumps. pkg(ng) fails due to missing libpkg.so.5 and even > rejects being reinstalled. But /usr/local/lib/libpkg.so.0 is even there! > Disabling the use of pkg with commenting out WITH_PKGNG=yes in > /etc/make.conf leads to the above issues with mtree and install. > Disabling this pkgng tag leads to reinstallation of missing packages, > which are store in the pkgng sqlite format and not as ASCII anymore, but > then I get > /var/runld-elf.so.hints: No such file or directory Is this a typo, or literal transcription? (The missing "/" between 'run' and 'ld-elf.so.hints', that is.) > Error: shared library "iconv.3" does not exist. > > But most of the libs have never been touch! So what is the loader > complaining about? > > Well, I'm floating like a dead man in the water and I'm glad that one > box survided although suffering from the same symptomes. > > I tried to find rescue images and a rescue DVD of a snap shot server, > but there is no way to crawl through the informations on the web pages > towards a snapshot. All folders end up in 2011 and highly outdated > (www.freebsd.org, I didn't look at mirrors since I thought the main > server carries the most recent stuff). This isn't funny. No lead, no > hint, even in the download section. > Yes, I have been complaining about this for a while now... > If someone has some hints how to recompile the sources with an emergency > booted disk, I highly appreciate some desater advice. Maybe the release > of FreeBSD-10-CURRENT sources I compiled do have accidentally a nasty > bug, so it would be nice to update the sources and have a complete > recompilation done. > If you can get booted into a recovery medium, you can mount /usr/src and /usr/obj from the hosed system, and should be able to installworld/installkernel into the hosed system with DESTDIR set. Glen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 15:46:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB311065675 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:46:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=568424380=pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com) Received: from ip-002.utdallas.edu (ip-002.utdallas.edu [129.110.20.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8818FC19 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:46:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Group: None X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiEKAJUULVCBbgogTmdsb2JhbABFqleOUAQEgQ4BASIQgxoCgWMaiCCZG4ZOmwaRAGADiE6gEA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,778,1336366800"; d="scan'208";a="98097299" Received: from zxtm01.utdallas.edu (HELO [129.110.200.11]) ([129.110.10.32]) by ip-002.utdallas.edu with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 16 Aug 2012 10:45:28 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:45:25 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: FreeBSD Questions List Message-ID: <47AFB706686083E99B3A3F3E@localhost> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; size=729 Subject: Best file system for a busy webserver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:46:39 -0000 Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system noticeably better than any other? Just curious. I'm getting ready to setup a new box running FreeBSD 9, and since I'm starting from scratch, I'm questioning all my previous assumptions. -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson "There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 15:51:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2149D1065673 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:51:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryan@shatow.net) Received: from secure.xzibition.com (secure.xzibition.com [173.160.118.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94938FC14 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:51:43 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sweb; b=osUqJH RD0/CmIHkcQZ5gw42391PnZ7g2tx8M4yDLL9S+uk8HeMPuNpPvkpemiRnQ/CA9NH 8qIDOXINoVgepz1XrRt1WZ8+6lpn9IBeRLaOhIYElLW5unzuZBYH/shMUazO8Zhv uza8YFw1gUHmewwn5PF1i4erqcDTZowqEaOBM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sweb; bh=FGnO0il/Kct/ n7rIDC0dGKTnEm1p5LG+kjn41SUPGuY=; b=pK5Rz8Q9bSljEI7+UvHG4Ou8wzZq fytOXuNHkCZPiFjOKMO8tqaQ6Gy76DwWWiMoSwN53IVJ6Yp7ID/s8oRWlsBEjrWE muBTdFwoPY4qdkNXu5LpbUgVSNsxg8m65/su06TjyucIY+EUhrEu0MAWaBCLx5rz S/IDmnbF/zgclWA= Received: (qmail 50741 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2012 10:51:35 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.74?) (bryan@shatow.net@74.94.87.209) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 16 Aug 2012 10:51:35 -0500 Message-ID: <502D170B.2070302@shatow.net> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:51:39 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Hartmann, O." References: <502D12C0.2060405@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <502D12C0.2060405@zedat.fu-berlin.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Current , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:51:44 -0000 On 8/16/2012 10:33 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote: > I tried to find rescue images and a rescue DVD of a snap shot server, > but there is no way to crawl through the informations on the web pages > towards a snapshot. All folders end up in 2011 and highly outdated > (www.freebsd.org, I didn't look at mirrors since I thought the main > server carries the most recent stuff). This isn't funny. No lead, no > hint, even in the download section. http://pub.allbsd.org/FreeBSD-snapshots/ Bryan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 15:56:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F086106566B for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:56:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8334F8FC0C for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7GFtpX1053801; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:55:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q7GFtmuX053798; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:55:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:55:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Paul Schmehl In-Reply-To: <47AFB706686083E99B3A3F3E@localhost> Message-ID: References: <47AFB706686083E99B3A3F3E@localhost> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:56:00 +0200 (CEST) Cc: FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: Best file system for a busy webserver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:56:19 -0000 > Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy > webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system noticeably better > than any other? Use stock UFS, just configure it properly. most importantly noatime. Amount of cached data is more important than hit count. Unless your webpage is incredibly bad design or constantly load different set of large amount of small file - filesystem shouldn't be a limit. Repetitive file fetches would go from cache. > Just curious. I'm getting ready to setup a new box running FreeBSD 9, and > since I'm starting from scratch, I'm questioning all my previous assumptions. Small files will be cached, if you push data from large set of big files that will not fit cache, make sure transfers will be fine. use 32kB block size, 4kB fragment size for UFS add options MAXPHYS=2097152 (or even twice of that) to your kernel config so there will be large transfers from disk. This tuning will not make any harm to small files. My recommendation is for serving files by WWW (or actually - by any means). If you ask for SQL database subsystem then answer is completely different: make sure all database fits memory cache, or is on SSD or it WILL BE SLOW no matter what you use. Do everything you can to limit amount of sync writes. if you use SSD and your database software allow dedicating raw partition - do it. If not - it is not crucial but useful, avoid double buffering of unix cache and database cache. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 17:03:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30991065678 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:03:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (relay01a.mail.uk1.eechost.net [217.69.40.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8014E8FC1D for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=rpi-1.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T23Oz-0006pl-Id; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:58:33 +0100 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by rpi-1.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T23Tb-0008AZ-1f; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:03:19 +0100 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:02:57 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20120816180257.6f5d58e5.steve@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <47AFB706686083E99B3A3F3E@localhost> References: <47AFB706686083E99B3A3F3E@localhost> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.3 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) X-Face: %]+HVL}K`P8>+8ZcY-WGHP6j@&mxMo9JH6_WdgIgUGH)JX/usO0%jy7T~IVgqjumD^OBqX, Kv^-GM6mlw(fI^$"QRKyZ$?xx/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain) Cc: Paul Schmehl Subject: Re: Best file system for a busy webserver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:03:03 -0000 On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:45:25 -0500 Paul Schmehl wrote: > Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy > webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system noticeably better > than any other? That's an average of about 3 hits per second. If it's static pages then pretty much anything will handle it easily (but please don't use FAT). If it's dynamic then the whole problem is more complex than a simple page rate. If that load is bursty it may make a difference too. Other considerations may come into play - how big is this filesystem (number of files, maximum number of entries in a directory, volume of data) ? Are there many users needing to be protected from each other ? What about archives ? snapshots ? growth ? churn ? uptime requirements, disaster recovery time ? -- Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays C:>WIN | A better way to focus the sun The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 17:24:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89643106564A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:24:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320798FC12 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q7GHR5de000512; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:27:05 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:27:05 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201208161727.q7GHR5de000512@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com In-Reply-To: <47AFB706686083E99B3A3F3E@localhost> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best file system for a busy webserver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:24:41 -0000 > Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:45:25 -0500 > From: Paul Schmehl > To: FreeBSD Questions List > Subject: Best file system for a busy webserver > > Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy > webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system noticeably better > than any other? > > Just curious. I'm getting ready to setup a new box running FreeBSD 9, and > since I'm starting from scratch, I'm questioning all my previous > assumptions. "Insufficient data" for a meaningful answer. A _LOT_ depends on the natue of the pages being served, Is the underlying data fairly 'static', or is it being frequently updated? If 'updated', you need to take into consideration things like 'how often', 'how large', and 'how localized' (in terms of the filesystem structure), are the updates. If file access is almost exclusively reads, the filesystem choice doesn't make much difference O/S 'caching', which occurs above the filesystem level, will handle the 'most frequently accessed' stuff. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 18:11:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1763106566C for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:11:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from mail.shire.net (mail.shire.net [199.102.78.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A888FC14 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:11:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-76-27-96-201.hsd1.ut.comcast.net ([76.27.96.201] helo=[192.168.99.216]) by mail.shire.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T24XJ-000HuV-3X; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:11:13 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BB772409-CB4E-4C76-B7DF-A0183396825F"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1 From: "Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC" In-Reply-To: <8847D91D-169C-43C5-882C-81695210B0B3@pengar.com> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:11:12 -0600 Message-Id: <9B93809A-302E-4DA4-A6B4-6AA2D44E4BD4@shire.net> References: <8847D91D-169C-43C5-882C-81695210B0B3@pengar.com> To: FreeBSD Mailing List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 76.27.96.201 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Chad Leigh Subject: Re: ZFS stats in "top" -- ZFS performance started being crappy in spurts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:11:19 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_BB772409-CB4E-4C76-B7DF-A0183396825F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Aug 11, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Chad Leigh - Pengar LLC wrote: > Hi >=20 > I have a FreeBSD 9 system with ZFS root. It is actually a VM under = Xen on a beefy piece of HW (4 core Sandy Bridge 3ghz Xeon, total HW = memory 32GB -- VM has 4vcpus and 6GB RAM). Mirrored gpart partitions. = I am looking for data integrity more than performance as long as = performance is reasonable (which it has more than been the last 3 = months). >=20 > The other "servers" on the same HW, the other VMs on the same, don't = have this problem but are set up the same way. There are 4 other = FreeBSD VMs, one running email for a one man company and a few of his = friends, as well as some static web pages and stuff for him, one runs a = few low use web apps for various customers, and one runs about 30 = websites with apache and nginx, mostly just static sites. None are = heavily used. There is also one VM with linux running a couple low use = FrontBase databases. Not high use database -- low use ones. >=20 > The troubleseome VM has been running fine for over 3 months since I = installed it. Level of use has been pretty much constant. The = server runs 4 jails on it, each dedicated to a different bit of email = processing for a small number of users. One is a secondary DNS. One = runs clamav and spamassassin. One runs exim for incoming and outgoing = mail. One runs dovecot for imap and pop. There is no web server or = database or anything else running. >=20 > Total number of mail users on the system is approximately 50, plus or = minus. Total mail traffic is very low compared to "real" mail servers. >=20 > Earlier this week things started "freezing up". It might last a few = minutes, or it might last 1/2 hour. Processes become unresponsive. = This can last a few minutes or much longer. It eventually resolves = itself and things are good for another 10 minutes or 3 hours until it = happens again. When it happens, lots of processes are listed in "top" = as=20 >=20 > zfs > zio->i > zfs > tx->tx > db->db >=20 > state. These processes only get listed in these states when there = are problems. What are these states indicative of? >=20 Ok, after much reading of ZFS blog posts, forum postings, email list = postings, and trying stuff out, I seem to have gotten stuff back down to = normal and reasonable performance. In case anyone has similar issues in a similar circumstance, here is = what I did. Some of these may have had little or no effect but this is = what was changed. The biggest effect was when I did the following: vfs.zfs.zfetch.block_cap from default 256 down to 64 This was like night and day. The idea to try this from a post by user = "madtrader" in the forum = http://forums.sagetv.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3D43830&page=3D2 . He = was recording multiple streams of HD video and trying to play HD video = off a stream from the same server/ZFS file system. =20 Also, setting vfs.zfs.write_limit_override to something other than the default = disabled "0" seems to have had a relatively significant effect. Before = I worked with the "block_cap" above, I was focussing on this and had = tried everything from 64M to 768M. It is currently set to 576M and is = around the area where I was having best results on my system with my = amount of RAM (6GB). I tried 512M and had good results and then 768M, = which was still good but not quite as good as far as I could tell from = testing. So I went with 576M on my last attempt and then added in the = block_cap and things really are pretty much back to normal. I turned on vdev caching vfs.zfs.vdev.cache.size form 0 to 10M. Don't know if it helped. =20 I also lowered=20 vfs.zfs.txg.timeout from 5 to 3. This seems to have had a slightly = noticeable effect. I also adjusted vfs.zfs.arc_max The default of 0 (meaning system self set) seemed to result in an actual = value of around 75-80% of RAM, which seemed high. I ended up setting = it at 3072M, which for me seems to work well. Don't know what the = overall effect on the problem was though. Thanks Chad --Apple-Mail=_BB772409-CB4E-4C76-B7DF-A0183396825F-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 18:17:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F25106564A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:17:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=568424380=pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com) Received: from ip-001.utdallas.edu (ip-001.utdallas.edu [129.110.20.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4DCC8FC12 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:17:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Group: None X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnMFAK43LVCBbgogTmdsb2JhbABFqlePbgEBIoJrAQEEATgCPwULCxguQxQZiAcGuw2LCoV3YAOITpgQiAA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,780,1336366800"; d="scan'208";a="103939241" Received: from zxtm01.utdallas.edu (HELO [129.110.200.11]) ([129.110.10.32]) by ip-001.utdallas.edu with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 16 Aug 2012 13:16:28 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:16:26 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <175D3B4E21331C5682EE2148@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20120816180257.6f5d58e5.steve@sohara.org> References: <47AFB706686083E99B3A3F3E@localhost> <20120816180257.6f5d58e5.steve@sohara.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; size=3159 Cc: Steve O'Hara-Smith Subject: Re: Best file system for a busy webserver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:17:38 -0000 --On August 16, 2012 6:02:57 PM +0100 Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:45:25 -0500 > Paul Schmehl wrote: > >> Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy >> webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system noticeably >> better than any other? > > That's an average of about 3 hits per second. If it's static pages > then pretty much anything will handle it easily (but please don't use > FAT). If it's dynamic then the whole problem is more complex than a > simple page rate. If that load is bursty it may make a difference too. > Thanks for the reply. It's a combination. There are many static pages, but there is also a php-mysql forum that generates pages on the fly. It accounts for about half of the traffic. I've always used ufs but am wondering if switching to zfs would make sense. This stats page might answer some of your questions: Other considerations may come into play - how big is this > filesystem (number of files, maximum number of entries in a directory, > volume of data) ? Are there many users needing to be protected from each > other ? What about archives ? snapshots ? growth ? churn ? uptime > requirements, disaster recovery time ? I don't even know where to begin. There's about 15G of data on the server. Maybe this will help answer your questions: # sysctl -a | grep file kern.maxfiles: 12328 kern.bootfile: /boot/kernel/kernel kern.maxfilesperproc: 11095 kern.openfiles: 492 kern.corefile: %N.core kern.filedelay: 30 p1003_1b.mapped_files: 1 last pid: 40369; load averages: 0.01, 0.03, 0.00 up 104+09:33:44 13:14:49 137 processes: 1 running, 136 sleeping CPU: 0.7% user, 0.0% nice, 0.1% system, 0.0% interrupt, 99.2% idle Mem: 229M Active, 6108M Inact, 1056M Wired, 15M Cache, 828M Buf, 514M Free Swap: 16G Total, 28K Used, 16G Free The system is not being stressed. If by users, you means shell accounts, there's two, so that's not really an issue. The site has grown organically over the years from a few hundred hits a month to the now 6-8 million hits (depends on the time of year and the weather - mechanics are usually out in the garage if it's sunny and on the computer when it's not). Uptime is not an issue. The owners have repeatedly said if the site is down for two days they don't care. (The forum users don't feel that way though!) We've had one "disaster" (hard drive failure and raid failed while I was on vacation), and it took about 36 hours to get back online, but that was 10 years ago. The site doesn't go down - it's running on FreeBSD. :-) -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson "There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 18:33:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13455106566B; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:33:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71798FC0A; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1T24su-0004xQ-Gp>; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:33:32 +0200 Received: from e178041036.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.41.36] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1T24su-0004aN-Ay>; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:33:32 +0200 Message-ID: <502D3CFB.3020004@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:33:31 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120810 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Current FreeBSD , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig12F8D43F9DB032F2CDBF8B80" X-Originating-IP: 85.178.41.36 Cc: Subject: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:33:34 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig12F8D43F9DB032F2CDBF8B80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I ran into a very delicate and nasty situation. On several boxes, FreeBSD 9.1-PRE and FreeBSD 10-CURRENT (build of CURRENT sources from yesterday, r239295 Wed August 15 17:04:51 CEST 2012 amd64, I had to recompile all requirements of port Apache22, since after the port update it core dumped. On FreeBSD 9.1-PRE, with pkg(ng), things went well. Recompilation and installation of all "portmaster -f apache-2.2" requirements went perfect.= On both FreeBSD 10-CURRENT boxes it ended up in a mess, all of a sudden(!), while reinstalling port security/cyrus-sasl2, things started to fail in a dramatik way! On both FBSD 10 boxes, the installation of the port security/cyrus-sasl2 got corrupted by "install" and/or "mtree" dumping core and signalling SIGNAL 11. Booting into multiuser mode is impossible, login core dumps SIGNAL 11, many other daemons, too. The only way is to boot into single user mode. An installation failed due to pkg(ng) was missing libarchive.so via portmaster or via core dumping install(1). By installing on one box, my home box, port security/cyrus-sasl2 manually, luckily install(1) and mtree(1) didn't coredump and it worked - and this precedure rescued me. But on my lab's development box, it doesn't work! On this specific box, where this nasty problem also occured the same way by simply recompiling everything for port www/apache22, including the reinstallation of port security/cyrus-sasl2. Nearly every binary is suddenly coredumping (as on the home box). login, vi, install, devfs, syslogd, mtree, id, find ... a whole lot of binaries seem to be compromised by something I do not see (libsasl2.so perhaps?). I tried to help myself via copying /rescue/vi to /usr/bin/vi to have at least a working vi. But in /rescue, I can not find install or mtree. I'm not familiar with the sophisticated ways of /rescue. Where are install(1) and mtree(1)? Trying to reinstall security/cyrus-sasl2 from single-user fails due install coredumps. pkg(ng) fails due to missing libpkg.so.5 and even rejects being reinstalled. But /usr/local/lib/libpkg.so.0 is even there! Disabling the use of pkg with commenting out WITH_PKGNG=3Dyes in /etc/make.conf leads to the above issues with mtree and install. Disabling this pkgng tag leads to reinstallation of missing packages, which are store in the pkgng sqlite format and not as ASCII anymore, but then I get /var/runld-elf.so.hints: No such file or directory Error: shared library "iconv.3" does not exist. But most of the libs have never been touch! So what is the loader complaining about? Well, I'm floating like a dead man in the water and I'm glad that one box survided although suffering from the same symptomes. I tried to find rescue images and a rescue DVD of a snap shot server, but there is no way to crawl through the informations on the web pages towards a snapshot. All folders end up in 2011 and highly outdated (www.freebsd.org, I didn't look at mirrors since I thought the main server carries the most recent stuff). This isn't funny. No lead, no hint, even in the download section. If someone has some hints how to recompile the sources with an emergency booted disk, I highly appreciate some desater advice. Maybe the release of FreeBSD-10-CURRENT sources I compiled do have accidentally a nasty bug, so it would be nice to update the sources and have a complete recompilation done. Thanks in advance, oh --------------enig12F8D43F9DB032F2CDBF8B80 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQLTz8AAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8RtAIAOLnHQ2ydNbxTCbWnwDybeSj ZOCDiSdufxyfgO3pM8CqTPv3SQ+1Vk3KoROLzxMrbYS7izdc0a5SbydkzgyfLcb9 zLmJIGu4hsUd7ExZ3tMEQpNO48qxMrQMXygIgqw+/n6ALN0AZ//FSAeuCmXII1h+ STOlp3dY72LHZnMj8NFaH3KQAkHNs7vPeglmiQsa00cVOEetAzW28sNhXl2gOSFQ eUOTNyXI29wdmsIG3aTyekNCpuDJZj8zZMQxVUoMmcC6yqbRVitObJG+asRLER5X RRMqrsDqRkl7A7hU/Ipp1Xye96JDmFdLgqce3NM/glTStyqUCldBlMtUmXOPAwo= =4SUq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig12F8D43F9DB032F2CDBF8B80-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 19:01:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDDF106564A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:01:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BE18FC16 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 16 Aug 2012 15:01:47 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BXM51565; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:01:45 -0400 Received-SPF: None identity=pra; client-ip=209.6.86.84; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Neutral identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.6.86.84; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None identity=helo; client-ip=209.6.86.84; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="postmaster@jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received: from 209-6-86-84.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.86.84]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 16 Aug 2012 15:01:45 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20525.17304.916707.3626@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:01:44 -0400 To: Paul Schmehl In-Reply-To: <175D3B4E21331C5682EE2148@localhost> References: <47AFB706686083E99B3A3F3E@localhost> <20120816180257.6f5d58e5.steve@sohara.org> <175D3B4E21331C5682EE2148@localhost> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Steve O'Hara-Smith , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best file system for a busy webserver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:01:50 -0000 Paul Schmehl writes: > > That's an average of about 3 hits per second. If it's static pages > > then pretty much anything will handle it easily (but please don't use > > FAT). If it's dynamic then the whole problem is more complex than a > > simple page rate. If that load is bursty it may make a difference too. > > > > Thanks for the reply. It's a combination. There are many static > pages, but there is also a php-mysql forum that generates pages > on the fly. It accounts for about half of the traffic. I've > always used ufs but am wondering if switching to zfs would make > sense. ZFS is known to use much more RAM than UFS. While (from the 'top' below) you have enough ... is that RAM best used for ZFS, or for something else? Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 19:17:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F919106564A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:17:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872CF8FC0C for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:17:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbgk8 with SMTP id gk8so2033308lbb.13 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:17:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=27plLPSdAid7ph636P91P6ZWU9EeAxLShAyT/UUeT+s=; b=Bvg2aR/ncGX2I6Qx51XtpqaNmWczathzz4iJzoR1yRFY1zHb4mZtWdYlHR4HKWoLd5 hQuvi4ZipLPJKN1e6mjHnSWidnTFtYb9SNQm9C+RMvbhFmaNu1rH8RSBMAsMB4ykU6qq iGc2n0gNQqkLXFer298VAShgNFIZW2t51vzPJKlQMeG29MEIExnRR3P7+UUJunSlBMf5 ZG80TK1vjuuXUSg/xv2ZVqJ7ezON4CVTHuNj02NLctDj7E0jG94H/57PaIwFJB+CeKvA nSNh/XIWBCVpfm1sk2FDyJArzgnD9167LP/la3YTs96SzXYufHgPsadizdrhfFPupGcB hkyQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.148.195 with SMTP id tu3mr2343951lab.16.1345144652063; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:17:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.115.6 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:17:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120816122927.ff452986.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <84ED3B95-5A7D-4C2A-AC35-B54DFA8BFDF1@boosten.org> <20120816122927.ff452986.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:17:32 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Questions FreeBSD , Peter Boosten Subject: Re: Blender port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:17:34 -0000 On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Polytropon wrote: > On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:33:22 +0200, Peter Boosten wrote: >> So I did a ktrace, and it seems to stumble on a library it cannot find: libirml.so >> This library however is nowhere to be found on my system, nor in the ports repository. >> >> Does anyone know what this library is for, and where would I find that library? No port seems to install that library (at least according to pkg-plist files). Maybe you could file a PR > > IRML - it seems to be the "Intel Resource Management Layer library. > It is a work dispatcher used by Threading Building Blocks (TBB)." > The tbb port (devel/tbb) however does not contain it. No port > seems to mention it in its pkg-plist file. The google search > results are very disillusioning, even more than the "typical > Linuxisms" that sometimes hits a FreeBSD port... ;-) > > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 19:20:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FED106567F for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:20:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6698FC18 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.42.135] (helo=smtp4.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T25cO-0005AP-33 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:20:32 +0200 Received: from 5419839c.cm-5-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([84.25.131.156] helo=ra.egypt.nl) by smtp4.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T25cN-0008AX-RZ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:20:32 +0200 Received: from mbp.egypt.nl (mbp.egypt.nl [192.168.13.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ra.egypt.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B77263983E for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:20:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Boosten Message-Id: <3CEA4276-C8A3-4173-869F-6069FD295F18@boosten.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1485\)) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:20:31 +0200 References: <84ED3B95-5A7D-4C2A-AC35-B54DFA8BFDF1@boosten.org> <20120816122927.ff452986.freebsd@edvax.de> To: Questions FreeBSD In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1485) X-Ziggo-spambar: ---- X-Ziggo-spamscore: -4.9 X-Ziggo-spamreport: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PROLO_TRUST_RDNS=-3, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_PASS=-0.001 X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Blender port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:20:39 -0000 On 16 aug. 2012, at 21:17, Fernando Apestegu=EDa = wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Polytropon wrote: >> On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:33:22 +0200, Peter Boosten wrote: >>> So I did a ktrace, and it seems to stumble on a library it cannot = find: libirml.so >>> This library however is nowhere to be found on my system, nor in the = ports repository. >>>=20 >>> Does anyone know what this library is for, and where would I find = that library? >=20 > No port seems to install that library (at least according to pkg-plist = files). > Maybe you could file a PR I sent an email to the maintainer... see what he/she's got to say. --=20 Peter Boosten From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 19:21:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257C9106567A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:21:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lconrad@Go2France.com) Received: from mgw1.MEIway.com (mgw1.meiway.com [81.255.84.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2DF8FC1F for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VirusGate.MEIway.com (virusgate.meiway.com [81.255.84.76]) by mgw1.MEIway.com (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id CC4E2471F99 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:51:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.Go2France.com (ms1.meiway.com [81.255.84.73]) by VirusGate.MEIway.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9E43865B9 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:51:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lconrad@Go2France.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:51:22 +0200 Message-Id: <201208162051.AA214893042@mail.Go2France.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "Len Conrad " X-Sender: To: X-Mailer: Subject: can a jail have link to outside of the jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lconrad@Go2France.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:21:49 -0000 I have an ssh user who needs only to search some log files not in his jail. The jail required because I don't want the user seeing the rest the machine. If the dirs were linked to his jail, would that work? What I'd really like is something like ftpchroot for but ssh. suggestions? Len From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 19:31:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB70106564A; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:31:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gg0-f182.google.com (mail-gg0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4AB8FC14; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnk4 with SMTP id k4so4060541ggn.13 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:31:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=RMVV9HUvRFCuxme9jmldNa1gRlXsOzeo+IdRZFe9ZfE=; b=ppSnXwd9I38LrrFncKqWOtsR3K97ZBjZgTUEU39jLlwc7AatU31K51qYi3r/GmIHMS 2+esaz5vmYTnaXOpkThOByZOuFLXTlsClju0HaiRNDhujhIwujbjpnxbh6aI9G3jHX8c woDOa1+rma6RTUetCG21avT1LblekkbES+t89A5nCQxIjN47EPa3McFJOvPfNeNlaFTj dmBkb9Ep/J52vgtIA/UFGs1WSmKrgLMuyYs0v88g4g0h4FKoAcWW7A7GKjbOCWaikdiK bXDamLDDZHgZV1sas3uBWCVXMiotgIY7zmzvJgIkPRkYJjwmBxGmhM1dl2T0Ov7lMlJM jMfg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.20.69 with SMTP id l5mr1865786oee.114.1345145468549; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:31:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.142.201 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:31:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <502D3CFB.3020004@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <502D3CFB.3020004@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:31:08 -0700 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: "O. Hartmann" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Current FreeBSD , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:31:10 -0000 On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:33 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > I ran into a very delicate and nasty situation. Please don't cross-post / double-post. Thanks, -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 19:44:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78EF6106566B; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:44:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF0E8FC0A; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so5520430obb.13 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:44:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=lKWicm8gAbYqNIn/QEI9q0sIr61MqZX6vtjT644zJgM=; b=scVNKyBbU1G/UXW4wAvaUntbwTxIPKum+iGkt+ZZk2FZbS4G+XbTZMRFpbBRYD0ZaZ 5Q03hu7RPc1KBXYh/ggeZN/iGlJBoHQB1jPV0+8dBmNR3yjWzYtNA+caqke2TLCNtXZV 7OP7YRF9OCQ0OEpPUhdRQxSB6Y9fc5Ak16vIgbqVTqJ4UjqTUp7PQJadxJ2RfF9aeRqq 8LpUh02jn5d+39vZo2aAoHgoatx38SkGnrQNgU26+SKaEcXfiatXhJj3zo+zozVpHgKo c3onRhG1kdVbVuY7n60V6VnB/bWkZtgYyzh3DhXqaSl+O3urB1zloRn0ovIBdE2niAdT Yo2A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.117.71 with SMTP id kc7mr1932068obb.62.1345146275687; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.142.201 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:44:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <502D12C0.2060405@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <502D12C0.2060405@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:44:35 -0700 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: "Hartmann, O." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Current , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:44:36 -0000 On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote: > > I ran into a very delicate and nasty situation. ... > On both FBSD 10 boxes, the installation of the port security/cyrus-sasl2 > got corrupted by "install" and/or "mtree" dumping core and signalling > SIGNAL 11. Booting into multiuser mode is impossible, login core dumps > SIGNAL 11, many other daemons, too. The only way is to boot into single > user mode. I'm not drawing a correlation between this and unrelated coredumping processes. > An installation failed due to pkg(ng) was missing libarchive.so via > portmaster or via core dumping install(1). By installing on one box, my > home box, port security/cyrus-sasl2 manually, luckily install(1) and > mtree(1) didn't coredump and it worked - and this precedure rescued me. > But on my lab's development box, it doesn't work! Don't make delete-old-lib unless you have it moved off to compat directories, or have rebuilt everything using the new libarchive. > On this specific box, where this nasty problem also occured the same way > by simply recompiling everything for port www/apache22, including the > reinstallation of port security/cyrus-sasl2. Nearly every binary is > suddenly coredumping (as on the home box). login, vi, install, devfs, > syslogd, mtree, id, find ... a whole lot of binaries seem to be > compromised by something I do not see (libsasl2.so perhaps?). truss the binaries to figure out exactly what's going wrong. A lot of this lost effort could be avoided (like others have posted on the list more than once), by having a centralized package distribution server, and by having VMs or jails and keeping snapshots with pre-upgrade state on the package building machine to avoid "dead in the water scenarios" like you're in right now. > I tried to help myself via copying /rescue/vi to /usr/bin/vi to have at > least a working vi. But in /rescue, I can not find install or mtree. I'm > not familiar with the sophisticated ways of /rescue. Where are > install(1) and mtree(1)? I ran into this issue too a little while ago. I basically gave up on recovering a VM and nuked and repaved it using a LiveCD with a chroot, some cp -p'ing, etc. But yes.. it would be nice if I could have recovered the system at least with a static toolchain: cc, binutils [equivalent], mtree, install, etc. ... > Disabling this pkgng tag leads to reinstallation of missing packages, > which are store in the pkgng sqlite format and not as ASCII anymore, but > then I get > /var/runld-elf.so.hints: No such file or directory > Error: shared library "iconv.3" does not exist. service ldconfig start ? > But most of the libs have never been touch! So what is the loader > complaining about? ... > I tried to find rescue images and a rescue DVD of a snap shot server, > but there is no way to crawl through the informations on the web pages > towards a snapshot. All folders end up in 2011 and highly outdated > (www.freebsd.org, I didn't look at mirrors since I thought the main > server carries the most recent stuff). This isn't funny. No lead, no > hint, even in the download section. > > If someone has some hints how to recompile the sources with an emergency > booted disk, I highly appreciate some desater advice. Maybe the release > of FreeBSD-10-CURRENT sources I compiled do have accidentally a nasty > bug, so it would be nice to update the sources and have a complete > recompilation done. > > Thanks in advance, Simply put: fix your infrastructure (as this isn't the first time you have complained about infrastructure issues on the MLs). A lot of these issues should not be issues if you set up your infrastructure properly to deal with building things only once, backup packages before installation, you had snapshots of your system, etc. This will help you avoid administration pain, and hopefully will result in less duplicated work. Cheers, -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 19:55:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3058D1065672 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.t@mail.com) Received: from mailout-us.mail.com (mailout-us.mail.com [74.208.122.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB20E8FC08 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2012 19:55:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO blazon-pc.runningwild.local) [78.84.105.231] by mail.gmx.com (mp-us009) with SMTP; 16 Aug 2012 15:55:32 -0400 X-Authenticated: #76218138 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19YZzZfowxYx/IuOpvSUGg8OR8oitofZQ+vXuZWHo Is+OyR+++at5EX Message-ID: <502D5032.4010801@mail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:55:30 +0300 From: Jeff Tipton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201208162051.AA214893042@mail.Go2France.com> In-Reply-To: <201208162051.AA214893042@mail.Go2France.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: can a jail have link to outside of the jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:55:34 -0000 On 08/16/2012 21:51, Len Conrad wrote: > I have an ssh user who needs only to search some log files not in his jail. The jail required because I don't want the user seeing the rest the machine. If the dirs were linked to his jail, would that work? > > What I'd really like is something like ftpchroot for but ssh. > > suggestions? > > Len > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" It's not clear from what you are writing whether you mean JAIL(8) (a secure, virtual FreeBSD OS on top of host OS) or chrooted directories. Anyway, ssh can be set up very easily to have some chrooted sftp users. Read this: https://calomel.org/sftp_chroot.html You will probably have to think about where to place the log directory it if it's important to have no other logs in it. -Jeff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 19:56:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8386A1065678; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:56:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DC28FC14; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.15]) by ltcfislmsgpa02.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7GJudOU012588 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:56:39 -0500 Received: from [10.0.0.103] (10.14.152.61) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:56:38 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Devin Teske In-Reply-To: <201208162051.AA214893042@mail.Go2France.com> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:56:36 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <81800F08-9149-4457-BA1D-EB07874039E2@fisglobal.com> References: <201208162051.AA214893042@mail.Go2France.com> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.61] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855, 1.0.260, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-08-16_06:2012-08-16, 2012-08-16, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: Devin Teske , freebsd-questions Questions Subject: Re: can a jail have link to outside of the jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Devin Teske List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:56:40 -0000 On Aug 16, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Len Conrad wrote: >=20 > I have an ssh user who needs only to search some log files not in his jai= l. The jail required because I don't want the user seeing the rest the mach= ine. If the dirs were linked to his jail, would that work?=20 >=20 To show a directory from a base-host to a member-jail, I'd recommend using = a nullfs-mount. Furthermore, you can automate the process in 2 different ways (scoped diffe= rently depending on how you use jails). You can add jail_{name}_mount_enable=3D"YES" to rc.conf(5) which enables th= e automatic handling of /etc/fstab.{name} every time you perform a "service= jail start|stop|restart {name}" (the mount will automatically be mounted a= nd unmounted on-demand of bringing the jail up-and-down irrespective of the= base host but respective to each jail). You'd load you /etc/fstab.{name} w= ith your nullfs mounts. The second way is of course is to put all your nullfs mounts into /etc/fsta= b (proper) but mark them as "noauto" (if desired) and optionally (if going = the noauto approach) add jail_{name}_exec_prestart=3D"mount dirname" and li= kewise [optional] jail_{name}_exec_poststop=3D"umount dirname" All depending on how you use jails. If you'd of course rather prefer all the mounts come up at boot and go from= permanent directories to permanent directories (which you know will never = go away), _and_ you like the idea of not having mounts going up and down wi= th your jails (perhaps you're fine-tuning your jail's startup), I'd say thr= ow them into /etc/fstab full-auto and not associate them with the jails. Bu= t it's all up to you. Hope that helps. > What I'd really like is something like ftpchroot for but ssh. >=20 Hmmm, does the above approach work better? just exposing one directory to h= is jail via nullfs? > suggestions? >=20 --=20 Cheers, Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 20:06:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782301065672 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:06:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christer.solskogen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gh0-f182.google.com (mail-gh0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E828FC08 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghrr13 with SMTP id r13so4117587ghr.13 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:06:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=NUaFwciEngVtvqpWPMPMYJVdW32b7ZB6YuO3ZTcIfFw=; b=Q9n0N0EzKIS9kWlnznQuUiMmlABAkWnCl9ZMDAdhUMUd8UVkTH5uWZx3ark9tu1tEX i+iYBuE7ac9dF3ul9ZVHt6q7Ad1MCPVw8WtPmSlO7ZXyAAPr4WQJkBrec9AwEBNewylu AlefyZXNbrJunA8gqnxs0wBaW7OZbcuQZaNWK5Ns2fpikpTxuU/aCAXQnMyE6d8DruuA RjAXeQihtN9a+s3bpjakNW5glBkQ1YJ3uHRYjddD7eT26L/3Botc8c0OXOJMKsqUDQzp UQ9WCgWaz+jzkdH9DDAkpTV/I8LYeXLf2TEUorCFsJDX18zN+gW4VKHVywNT11hdgEUM 58DA== Received: by 10.50.237.38 with SMTP id uz6mr3133065igc.2.1345147608318; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:06:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.103.103 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:06:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201208162051.AA214893042@mail.Go2France.com> References: <201208162051.AA214893042@mail.Go2France.com> From: Christer Solskogen Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:06:27 +0200 Message-ID: To: lconrad@go2france.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can a jail have link to outside of the jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:06:49 -0000 On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Len Conrad wrote: > > I have an ssh user who needs only to search some log files not in his jail. The jail required because I don't want the user seeing the rest the machine. If the dirs were linked to his jail, would that work? > man mount_nullfs(8) -- chs, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 20:42:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77707106566C for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:42:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (relay01a.mail.uk1.eechost.net [217.69.40.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D788FC0C for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=rpi-1.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T26pR-0003iQ-Em; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:38:05 +0100 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by rpi-1.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T26u3-0008Hw-Fn; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:42:51 +0100 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:42:30 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: Paul Schmehl Message-Id: <20120816214230.0f4fb446.steve@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <175D3B4E21331C5682EE2148@localhost> References: <47AFB706686083E99B3A3F3E@localhost> <20120816180257.6f5d58e5.steve@sohara.org> <175D3B4E21331C5682EE2148@localhost> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.3 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) X-Face: %]+HVL}K`P8>+8ZcY-WGHP6j@&mxMo9JH6_WdgIgUGH)JX/usO0%jy7T~IVgqjumD^OBqX, Kv^-GM6mlw(fI^$"QRKyZ$?xx/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best file system for a busy webserver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:42:34 -0000 On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:16:26 -0500 Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On August 16, 2012 6:02:57 PM +0100 Steve O'Hara-Smith > wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:45:25 -0500 > > Paul Schmehl wrote: > > > >> Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy > >> webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system noticeably > >> better than any other? > > > > That's an average of about 3 hits per second. If it's static > > pages then pretty much anything will handle it easily (but please don't > > use FAT). If it's dynamic then the whole problem is more complex than a > > simple page rate. If that load is bursty it may make a difference too. > > > > Thanks for the reply. It's a combination. There are many static pages, > but there is also a php-mysql forum that generates pages on the fly. It > accounts for about half of the traffic. I've always used ufs but am > wondering if switching to zfs would make sense. > > This stats page might answer some of your questions: > > Basically traffic is steady but it's busiest in the evenings (US time > zones) > > > Other considerations may come into play - how big is this > > filesystem (number of files, maximum number of entries in a directory, > > volume of data) ? Are there many users needing to be protected from each > > other ? What about archives ? snapshots ? growth ? churn ? uptime > > requirements, disaster recovery time ? > > I don't even know where to begin. There's about 15G of data on the > server. OK I would say there's no pressing reason to consider ZFS for this purpose. You'd save a bit of time in crash recovery with no fsck going on, and perhaps the checksum mechanism would give some peace of mind - but really in 15GB silent corruption is a very slow process - now if it were 15TB ... > last pid: 40369; load averages: 0.01, 0.03, 0.00 > up 104+09:33:44 13:14:49 > 137 processes: 1 running, 136 sleeping > CPU: 0.7% user, 0.0% nice, 0.1% system, 0.0% interrupt, 99.2% idle > Mem: 229M Active, 6108M Inact, 1056M Wired, 15M Cache, 828M Buf, 514M Free > Swap: 16G Total, 28K Used, 16G Free OTOH you have plenty of memory lying around doing nothing much (6108M inactive) so you can easily support ZFS if you want to play with it's features (the smooth integration of volume management and filesystem is rather cool). > The system is not being stressed. > > If by users, you means shell accounts, there's two, so that's not really > an issue. OK so no need for fancy quota schemes then. > Uptime is not an issue. The owners have repeatedly said if the site is > down for two days they don't care. (The forum users don't feel that way > though!) We've had one "disaster" (hard drive failure and raid failed > while I was on vacation), and it took about 36 hours to get back online, > but that was 10 years ago. The site doesn't go down - it's running on > FreeBSD. :-) It sounds like you have backups or at least some means of restoring the site in the event of disaster so that's all good. If there was a pressing need to be able to get back up fairly quickly and easily I'd be suggesting ZFS in RAID1 with a hot swap bay in which a third disc goes, attached as a third mirror, periodically split it off the mirror take it off site, and replace it with the one that's been off site. There's really nothing here that's pushing you in any particular direction for a filesystem, at 15GB if performance ever becomes a problem a RAID1 of SSDs with UFS would make it fly probably into the hundreds of hits per second range. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays C:>WIN | A better way to focus the sun The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 21:02:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC88E1065673 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:02:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=568424380=pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com) Received: from ip-001.utdallas.edu (ip-001.utdallas.edu [129.110.20.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCCB8FC12 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:02:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Group: None X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnMFAMteLVCBbgogTmdsb2JhbABFqlqPbgEBIoJrAQEEATgCPwULC0ZDFBmIBwa7AIsKgzuCPGADiE6gEA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,781,1336366800"; d="scan'208";a="103944005" Received: from zxtm01.utdallas.edu (HELO [129.110.200.11]) ([129.110.10.32]) by ip-001.utdallas.edu with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 16 Aug 2012 16:02:18 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:02:16 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <46848553A57E8518AD9DCCEB@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20120816214230.0f4fb446.steve@sohara.org> References: <47AFB706686083E99B3A3F3E@localhost> <20120816180257.6f5d58e5.steve@sohara.org> <175D3B4E21331C5682EE2148@localhost> <20120816214230.0f4fb446.steve@sohara.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; size=2408 Cc: Steve O'Hara-Smith Subject: Re: Best file system for a busy webserver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:02:19 -0000 --On August 16, 2012 9:42:30 PM +0100 Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: >> I don't even know where to begin. There's about 15G of data on the >> server. > > OK I would say there's no pressing reason to consider ZFS for this > purpose. You'd save a bit of time in crash recovery with no fsck going on, > and perhaps the checksum mechanism would give some peace of mind - but > really in 15GB silent corruption is a very slow process - now if it were > 15TB ... > Thanks. >> last pid: 40369; load averages: 0.01, 0.03, 0.00 >> up 104+09:33:44 13:14:49 >> 137 processes: 1 running, 136 sleeping >> CPU: 0.7% user, 0.0% nice, 0.1% system, 0.0% interrupt, 99.2% idle >> Mem: 229M Active, 6108M Inact, 1056M Wired, 15M Cache, 828M Buf, 514M >> Free Swap: 16G Total, 28K Used, 16G Free > > OTOH you have plenty of memory lying around doing nothing much > (6108M inactive) so you can easily support ZFS if you want to play with > it's features (the smooth integration of volume management and filesystem > is rather cool). > It's hard, nowadays, to buy a server that's too small for our needs. Most of them are way overspec'd for what this server does. Which is a nice luxury to have. > > It sounds like you have backups or at least some means of restoring > the site in the event of disaster so that's all good. Yes, daily, and the servers are always configured in RAID1. > If there was a > pressing need to be able to get back up fairly quickly and easily I'd be > suggesting ZFS in RAID1 with a hot swap bay in which a third disc goes, > attached as a third mirror, periodically split it off the mirror take > it off site, and replace it with the one that's been off site. > > There's really nothing here that's pushing you in any particular > direction for a filesystem, at 15GB if performance ever becomes a problem > a RAID1 of SSDs with UFS would make it fly probably into the hundreds of > hits per second range. Thanks for the input, Steve. I appreciate it. -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson "There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 21:24:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44BF7106564A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:24:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27C98FC08 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:24:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T27Ye-0002Nh-GO for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 23:24:48 +0200 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 23:24:48 +0200 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 23:24:48 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 20 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 30dc37b master) Subject: freebsd-update and csup - I'm going around in circles. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:24:56 -0000 Please forgive me if this is a daft question; I am quite new to FreeBSD. I have read the handbook assiduously and am attempting to follow it. This is 9.0-RELEASE-p3, by the way. Every time I run "freebsd-update fetch" it says it wants to update the following 5 source files "as part of updating to 9.0-RELEASE-p4": /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/trap.c /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c /usr/src/sys/netinet6/in6.c /usr/src/sys/netinet6/ip6_input.c So I run "freebsd-update install" and they are updated happily. But when I run csup with my standard-supfile, it puts the same 5 files back to where they were. What am I missing, or doing wrong? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 21:30:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C7C106564A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:30:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesp@musicreports.com) Received: from mri-mail.musicreports.com (smtp-relay.musicreports.com [38.98.50.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912018FC16 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:30:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mri-mail.musicreports.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C523E4801A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:30:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mri-mail.musicreports.com Received: from mri-mail.musicreports.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mri-mail.musicreports.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u9K2WYl74P04 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:30:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mri-mail.musicreports.com (mri-mail.musicreports.com [192.168.20.65]) by mri-mail.musicreports.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BFE3E4800D for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:30:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:30:42 -0700 (PDT) From: "James D. Parra" To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <91362895.86005.1345152642346.JavaMail.root@mri-mail> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [192.168.20.220] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.15_GA_2995 (ZimbraWebClient - SAF3 (Win)/6.0.15_GA_2995) Cc: Subject: Re: can't build Samba 35 on FreeBSD 9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:30:49 -0000 On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:59 PM, James D. Parra < jamesp@musicreports.com > wrote: Hello, I am trying to install Samba35 on FreeBSD 9.0 but I keep getting a build error. The text you gave us gives me the thought you are flailing in the dark. First off, use a port management tool eg portmaster. Learn how to use it fully including regularly reading /usr/ports/UPDATING The handbook has great information on managing ports, I suggest reading it closely if you want FreeBSD to be your friend. In this scenario, you would use portsnap fetch update(assuming you've once a portsnap extract once before) portmaster /usr/ports/net/samba35 The specific error in your message indicates some problem with ccache. What does your /etc/make.conf look like? -- Adam Vande More ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Thanks all for your replies. I had copied the details from what I had done from, http://forums.freebsd.org/archive/index.php/t-21461.html. I knew what the OP meant so I had issued, portsnap fetch, then portsnap extract, on my system. I was able to get this to work on FreeBSD 8.2 and was hoping to also get this working on 9.0. Since I will be using Kerberos, I use, 'make KRB5_HOME=/usr/local install clean'. My /etc/make.conf file has the following; cat /etc/make.conf # Uncomment this if you want to do port builds with no interaction #BATCH=yes # Keep KDE4 in /usr/local, fixes sharing of icons / mime and others KDE4_PREFIX=/usr/local # added by use.perl 2012-06-28 21:39:00 PERL_VERSION=5.12.4 #To build Samba WITH_ADS=yes I do need ADS as I will be joining this server to our domain. For reference, here is the build error; libsmb/libsmb_setget.c: In function 'smbc_getOptionUseCCache': libsmb/libsmb_setget.c:427: error: 'SMB_CTX_FLAG_USE_CCACHE' undeclared (first use in this function) libsmb/libsmb_setget.c:427: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once libsmb/libsmb_setget.c:427: error: for each function it appears in.) libsmb/libsmb_setget.c: In function 'smbc_setOptionUseCCache': libsmb/libsmb_setget.c:435: error: 'SMB_CTX_FLAG_USE_CCACHE' undeclared (first use in this function) The following command failed: cc -I/usr/local/include -O2 -pipe -DLDAP_DEPRECATED -fno-strict-aliasing -I. -I/usr/ports/net/samba35/work/samba-3.5.15/source3 -I/usr/ports/net/samba35/work/samba-3.5.15/source3/iniparser/src -Iinclude -I./include -I. -I. -I./../lib/replace -I./../lib/tevent -I./libaddns -I./librpc -I./.. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -Iinclude -I./include -I. -I. -I./../lib/replace -I./../lib/tevent -I./libaddns -I./librpc -I./.. -I./../lib/popt -I/usr/local/include -DLDAP_DEPRECATED -I/usr/ports/net/samba35/work/samba-3.5.15/source3/lib -I.. -I../source4 -D_SAMBA_BUILD_=3 -D_SAMBA_BUILD_=3 -fPIC -DPIC -c libsmb/libsmb_setget.c -o libsmb/libsmb_setget.o gmake: *** [libsmb/libsmb_setget.o] Error 1 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/samba35. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/samba35. Thanks for your help. James From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 22:17:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656A1106564A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:17:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 076528FC0A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7GM53WH086639 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:05:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <502D6E88.8020000@tundraware.com> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:04:56 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47AFB706686083E99B3A3F3E@localhost> <20120816180257.6f5d58e5.steve@sohara.org> <175D3B4E21331C5682EE2148@localhost> In-Reply-To: <175D3B4E21331C5682EE2148@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (ozzie.tundraware.com [192.168.0.1]); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:05:03 -0500 (CDT) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: q7GM53WH086639 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: Best file system for a busy webserver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:17:10 -0000 On 08/16/2012 01:16 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: >> Paul Schmehl wrote: >> >>> Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy >>> webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system noticeably >>> better than any other? >> With only 15G of data, I'd recommend a pair of 60G SSD drives like the OCZ Vertex IIIs (About $1/G these days) wired into a *hardware* RAID controller setup to mirror them. This gives you blazing speed and reliability. If you want to add another drive, you can make it RAID 5 which - with the right cabinet and mounting hardware - would give you hotswap capability. I know people are fond of software RAID but I personally do not consider this a very high reliability technology unless you're running true datacenter class hardware with redundant everything (disk, NIC, fiber ...) and that's probably overkill in this case. Good RAID controllers are available from a number of manufacturers. I dunno if FreeBSD supports them, but Rocket has a good reputation (though I've never used them) as do both Adaptec and LSI. In any case, a controller plus 3 drives would probably only set you back in the $500-ish area which seems like a reasonable price point. Furthermore, depending on the amount of stuff that you're serving that is static vs. dynamic, you may get benefit from increasing memory (thereby increasing the likelihood of a cache hit) and increasing the minimum/threshold values for the number of httpd processing running all the time. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 23:48:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A83106566C for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 23:48:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292A18FC0C for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 23:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-32-97.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.32.97]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9243B3CE9E; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 01:48:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7GNmIin002061; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 01:48:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 01:48:18 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Walter Hurry Message-Id: <20120817014818.68279be3.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update and csup - I'm going around in circles. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 23:48:25 -0000 On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:24:37 +0000 (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote: > Every time I run "freebsd-update fetch" it says it wants to update the > following 5 source files "as part of updating to 9.0-RELEASE-p4": > > /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/trap.c > /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh > /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c > /usr/src/sys/netinet6/in6.c > /usr/src/sys/netinet6/ip6_input.c > > So I run "freebsd-update install" and they are updated happily. > > But when I run csup with my standard-supfile, it puts the same 5 files > back to where they were. Not "and". Why are you mixing tools here? You're shooting your own foot. :-) You use _either_ freebsd-update to update your system the binary way, _or_ you use csup to update your sources and then compile your system from that sources. Solution: Don't use csup. :-) Side note: Check your update configuration files so they reflect the proper branch you want to follow. With freebsd-update you follow the -RELEASE-pX branch, with csup you can a) follow -RELEASE-pX b) follow -STABLE c) follow -CURRENT Note that you should not mix those! You can always switch branches when using the source code based method (csup), but you should not do so using freebsd-update. An example configuration to follow -RELEASE-pX using the csup method with "make update" would look like this: % cat /etc/sup/release.sup *default host=cvsup.freebsd.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9_0 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all Together with the selection in /etc/make.conf: SUP_UPDATE= YES SUP= /usr/bin/csup SUPFLAGS= -L 2 SUPHOST= cvsup.freebsd.org SUPFILE= /etc/sup/release.sup PORTSSUPFILE= /etc/sup/ports.sup DOCSUPFILE= /etc/sup/doc.sup DOC_LANG= en_US.ISO8859-1 de_DE.ISO8859-1 you can easily control the process. (Sidenote: I also have /etc/sup/stable.sup which looks like the example provided, but has tag=RELENG_9 in it. You could also use tag=RELENG_9_0_0_RELEASE to revert back to 9.0-RELEASE.) You can find an example for what the CVS tags mean here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 04:29:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EBC7106566B for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:29:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC748FC12 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:29:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7H4TLZn031972; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:29:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q7H4THSt031959; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:29:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:29:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Len Conrad In-Reply-To: <201208162051.AA214893042@mail.Go2France.com> Message-ID: References: <201208162051.AA214893042@mail.Go2France.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:29:21 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can a jail have link to outside of the jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:29:31 -0000 > > I have an ssh user who needs only to search some log files not in his jail. The jail required because I don't want the user seeing the rest the machine. If the dirs were linked to his jail, would that work? man mount_nullfs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 04:31:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B46F106567B for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:31:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202668FC15 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7H4Us9E032096; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:31:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q7H4Ufw5032093; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:30:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:30:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" In-Reply-To: <20120816214230.0f4fb446.steve@sohara.org> Message-ID: References: <47AFB706686083E99B3A3F3E@localhost> <20120816180257.6f5d58e5.steve@sohara.org> <175D3B4E21331C5682EE2148@localhost> <20120816214230.0f4fb446.steve@sohara.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:31:01 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best file system for a busy webserver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:31:08 -0000 > OK I would say there's no pressing reason to consider ZFS for this another ZFS fanatics. it is about performance. > direction for a filesystem, at 15GB if performance ever becomes a problem a > RAID1 of SSDs with UFS would make it fly probably into the hundreds of hits > per second range. classic for ZFS and "modern things" fanatics. lots of talk about high end hardware nothing about a thread. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 04:32:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8A71065673 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:32:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41DC8FC08 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7H4WgEH032224; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:32:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q7H4WgEb032221; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:32:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:32:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Tim Daneliuk In-Reply-To: <502D6E88.8020000@tundraware.com> Message-ID: References: <47AFB706686083E99B3A3F3E@localhost> <20120816180257.6f5d58e5.steve@sohara.org> <175D3B4E21331C5682EE2148@localhost> <502D6E88.8020000@tundraware.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:32:43 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best file system for a busy webserver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:32:49 -0000 > the OCZ Vertex IIIs (About $1/G these days) wired into a *hardware* > RAID controller setup to mirror them. This gives you blazing speed just like i would read some popular street PC newspaper. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 05:02:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475E41065689 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 05:02:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prab@sanciai.lt) Received: from plesk1.kis.lt (plesk1.kis.lt [193.0.251.193]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079688FC0C for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 05:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by plesk1.kis.lt (Postfix, from userid 502) id 49FD12C80001; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:55:20 +0300 (EEST) Received: from 85.255.58.232 ([85.255.58.232]) by webmail.k-mail.lt (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:55:20 +0300 Message-ID: <20120817075520.146211869cmcgqm0@webmail.k-mail.lt> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:55:20 +0300 From: prab@sanciai.lt To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-13; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.9) Subject: Double boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 05:02:46 -0000 Hello, I have installed FreeBSD 8.3 to Toshiba Satellite besides Windows XP. Unix boots ok, but I can't reach Windows anymore! It shows: F1 Win F2 FreeBSD F6 PXE Boot F1 - If I press F1, it stays hanging forever. I'm relatively new to FreeBSD. Please, advise which way to go out of this situation. When I rerun sysinstall, there is a warning: "chunk 'ad0s2' [179380224..234441647] does not start on a track boundary" (the chunk of FreeBSD) How to change the boundary of chunk? CDROM is not reachable, something happened to it. I can use only FreeBSD instruments. Which of them? Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 05:09:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4BF106566B for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 05:09:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730D38FC12 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 05:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so6343085obb.13 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:09:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=KYfYRanDlDJPG5vdfipTmMbWpcv9T2D/AnE0zkMrfps=; b=ArkAa+qVWfO9pxcvpzI8KpXe1SFMFOm/FHlH2JoN+LTEjiJTuUhGPDupNb4mDF0nCh qLL7s951urAzQBKe9WGUirhYk16cQ4/JpQ3zaQ2LAB8KMwNtnIa+8GlQwhG01OMdkPvO QGNc/oNI9LcMt8i5fxjSpjPu8+ddeojS2D4ICocUPmM7N+e0c90N+ynbCZ6PaozhfeKy IYLEdt4XPoF8Uq4Ny/cx8I4Sqpn7wt79bcBMYi45hnqhQfQN7r8bfR6GW/FgWMG+LvtG +wB8IYA9NFZBJw+uGy+Mn5ReUwmP1XGkgrJcimv+dFzBS768oUG8/hiz0hSg/e9KEoKC Gz0Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.43.40 with SMTP id t8mr2884516obl.93.1345180192203; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:09:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.83.130 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:09:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <47AFB706686083E99B3A3F3E@localhost> References: <47AFB706686083E99B3A3F3E@localhost> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:09:52 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Paul Schmehl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: Best file system for a busy webserver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 05:09:53 -0000 On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy > webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system noticeably better > than any other? > > Just curious. I'm getting ready to setup a new box running FreeBSD 9, and > since I'm starting from scratch, I'm questioning all my previous > assumptions. > Sounds like you have ample hardware, so I would probably consider ZFS. You get a lot of other options with it which simply aren't available or harder to manage on a UFS system. Things like data integrity, ZIL/ARC, live low-cost snapshots, diff'ing the snapshot, transparent compression, etc all come with ZFS. Great tools for certain scenarios. Properly setup, ZFS RAID functionality will own any hardware raid solution ever presented because ZFS doesn't rely on a battery for consistency, nor do they provide most other features stated including integrity oriented ones. ZFS is intended to work with raw disk/JBOD. Good controllers are still important, they simply don't have the knowledge to use them at peak efficiency. I don't see much benefit to SSD's for this use case. All the common files should be in the fs cache which is at least an order of magnitude faster than flash based memory, and finding enterprise SSD's(preferably SLC) which obey FLUSH commands appropriately and have a capicitor appropriate to production use is something more of a crapshoot than traditional SATA/SAS drives. All that being said, UFS is fine too. I use it most often for light VM installs and where resources are scarce. However the 2 single biggest ZFS feature I like are the data integrity and transparent compression are wonderful which aren't available in UFS. ZFS snapshots are much more functional as well and go well w/ zfs send/receive. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 06:13:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5D2106566B for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:13:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kkchn.in@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f54.google.com (mail-qa0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380BE8FC12 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qatn12 with SMTP id n12so1472854qat.13 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 23:13:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=TKsXONywPWntMILvE5QBr8EP3n8wI9UYCBPVkcLplDQ=; b=AQCl9UEZRWjDEfJVwuDZU5qKvQWbemHkMybzauNWQPWILBmZxpWApqyzFURi6rvsk/ F+mIgG4web9N+MvR840StZxd915Ngeq+hu2Fg/D6MZacakTo+akV6Ml7QYC+YOFWRB6R 0/qXggQ0GLEM5EHo3XvvNlFY3+r9aedQd6OOiAg4bNxtBwlhT7ppRJitqb3tNl+JbAoS ts7NEXBlHghD6XxLgv4ZMQknREJr6inZHd9IAK365usOOXnFALQ9PgUSWTnyrwefe2W9 dbVZo33ZHxoP+onQWt7ytfegLzJp4GHu3PSpOTo1hW2WVxlBynWFKYWTEQ9jnPzGJaWN Ry5g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.136.134 with SMTP id r6mr2905639qct.10.1345184021552; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 23:13:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.50.65 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 23:13:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:13:41 +0000 Message-ID: From: KK CHN To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Few queries FreeBSD upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:13:42 -0000 List, I observe the following error while installing from ports collection for any ports in an old FreeBSD server "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.options.mk", line 90: Malformed conditional (!defined(OPTIONS_DEFINE) || empty(OPTIONS_DEFINE:Monly)")) I tried the following 1) cvsup and make index throws the following error Variable ALL_OPTIONS is recursive. ===> arabic/ae_fonts_mono failed *** Error code 1 Unknown modifier 'u' 2) I done csup -L2 portsupfile && make fetchindex This also not helped 3) portsnap extract && portsnap fetch update Nothing improved All port installation fails, this is the port I am trying to install star# cd /usr/ports/databases/postgresql84-server/ star# make install clean "Makefile", line 115: Could not find bsd.port.options.mk Unknown modifier 'u' Unknown modifier 'u' "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.options.mk", line 90: Malformed conditional (!defined(OPTIONS_DEFINE) || empty(OPTIONS_DEFINE:Monly)")) Variable NO_OPTIONS is recursive. star# uname -a FreeBSD star.net 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #1: Thu May 5 15:55:38 IST 2011 root@star.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNELSTAR i386 I replaced the /usr/ports/Mk directory with the Mk directory downloaded from the FreeBSD-6.2 archive. Still the error in port install remains.. 1) Is there any solution for this issue other than upgrade ? 2) Please guide me: I must upgrade this old release. Can any one tell me which order I need to upgrade? I mean from 6.2 Release to which next version and next ? please mention the sequence to reach 9.0 Release 3) Which upgrade method I have to follow ? Source upgrade or binary upgrade? I am ready to do source upgrade please shed some light on the pros and cons of both ways of upgrade. 4) Which all are those system files & directories I need to backup before doing any of the upgrade to retrieve the system in case anything goes wrong? Thanks in advacne krish From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 06:37:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D0D106566C for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099448FC15 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local (host86-180-66-20.range86-180.btcentralplus.com [86.180.66.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7H6bVrb091991 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:37:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q7H6bVrb091991 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q7H6bVrb091991; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host host86-180-66-20.range86-180.btcentralplus.com [86.180.66.20] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <502DE6A3.7070205@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:37:23 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: KK CHN References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig269E45A953CFA646D494FBFE" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RDNS_DYNAMIC, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Few queries FreeBSD upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:37:37 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig269E45A953CFA646D494FBFE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 17/08/2012 07:13, KK CHN wrote: > I observe the following error while installing from ports collection > for any ports in an old FreeBSD server >=20 > "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.options.mk", line 90: Malformed conditional > (!defined(OPTIONS_DEFINE) || empty(OPTIONS_DEFINE:Monly)")) Yes. That's the result of a bug fix to make(1) which has allowed the ports generally to use code patterns that formerly used to fail. If you don't upgrade the OS to get the make(1) fixes, then you get the fail. > 1) Is there any solution for this issue other than upgrade ? No. Or at least, nothing that isn't less work than simply upgrading. > 2) Please guide me: >=20 > I must upgrade this old release. Can any one tell me which order I > need to upgrade? >=20 > I mean from 6.2 Release to which next version and next ? please > mention the sequence to reach 9.0 Release >=20 > 3) Which upgrade method I have to follow ? Source upgrade or > binary upgrade? >=20 > I am ready to do source upgrade please shed some light on the pros > and cons of both ways of upgrade. >=20 > 4) Which all are those system files & directories I need to backup bef= ore > doing any of the upgrade to retrieve the system in case anything goes > wrong? For an upgrade over so many major versions, what I'd recommend is actually to start out with a fresh hard drive and install a brand new system from scratch. Port over all your local customizations and data. This is a pretty inherently safe operation, as you'll always have your old hard drive available as fall-back. (But you should backup everything in any case.) It also lets you rethink the design of your systems -- everything from the partition layout to the choice of software used. The best way of doing this is to have a spare machine so you can have both the old and new systems running at once. Failing that, install both drives into the same system so you can access the old drive while working on the new one. Given that you started from 6.2-RELEASE your current drive must be several years old, and quite likely to be getting towards the end of its usable life. Pre-emptively moving to newer disk hardware is a good way to dodge potential problems there. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig269E45A953CFA646D494FBFE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlAt5qsACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyn2wCdFdwpJPISC5JqX6YDt5zdcQCa UdkAniZ0lJM7YToPdflpjrM8nXCPZVFG =MMpR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig269E45A953CFA646D494FBFE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 07:44:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF3E106564A; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:44:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D718FC08; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:44:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1T2HEW-0005p9-TD>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:44:40 +0200 Received: from munin.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.110]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1T2HEW-0007Vf-QK>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:44:40 +0200 Message-ID: <502DF668.5000904@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:44:40 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." Organization: FU Berlin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120727 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glen Barber References: <502D12C0.2060405@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20120816154424.GE1303@glenbarber.us> In-Reply-To: <20120816154424.GE1303@glenbarber.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.110 Cc: FreeBSD Current , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:44:42 -0000 On 08/16/12 17:44, Glen Barber wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:33:20PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >> >> I ran into a very delicate and nasty situation. >> >> On several boxes, FreeBSD 9.1-PRE and FreeBSD 10-CURRENT (build of >> CURRENT sources from yesterday, r239295 Wed August 15 17:04:51 CEST 2012 >> amd64, I had to recompile all requirements of port Apache22, since after >> the port update it core dumped. >> >> On FreeBSD 9.1-PRE, with pkg(ng), things went well. Recompilation and >> installation of all "portmaster -f apache-2.2" requirements went perfect. >> >> On both FreeBSD 10-CURRENT boxes it ended up in a mess, all of a >> sudden(!), while reinstalling port security/cyrus-sasl2, things started >> to fail in a dramatik way! >> >> On both FBSD 10 boxes, the installation of the port security/cyrus-sasl2 >> got corrupted by "install" and/or "mtree" dumping core and signalling >> SIGNAL 11. Booting into multiuser mode is impossible, login core dumps >> SIGNAL 11, many other daemons, too. The only way is to boot into single >> user mode. >> >> An installation failed due to pkg(ng) was missing libarchive.so via > > There is pkg-static for recovering in this type of situation. Oh ... I'm new to pkg(ng). > >> portmaster or via core dumping install(1). By installing on one box, my >> home box, port security/cyrus-sasl2 manually, luckily install(1) and >> mtree(1) didn't coredump and it worked - and this precedure rescued me. >> But on my lab's development box, it doesn't work! >> >> On this specific box, where this nasty problem also occured the same way >> by simply recompiling everything for port www/apache22, including the >> reinstallation of port security/cyrus-sasl2. Nearly every binary is >> suddenly coredumping (as on the home box). login, vi, install, devfs, >> syslogd, mtree, id, find ... a whole lot of binaries seem to be >> compromised by something I do not see (libsasl2.so perhaps?). >> >> I tried to help myself via copying /rescue/vi to /usr/bin/vi to have at >> least a working vi. But in /rescue, I can not find install or mtree. I'm >> not familiar with the sophisticated ways of /rescue. Where are >> install(1) and mtree(1)? >> >> Trying to reinstall security/cyrus-sasl2 from single-user fails due >> install coredumps. pkg(ng) fails due to missing libpkg.so.5 and even >> rejects being reinstalled. But /usr/local/lib/libpkg.so.0 is even there! >> Disabling the use of pkg with commenting out WITH_PKGNG=yes in >> /etc/make.conf leads to the above issues with mtree and install. >> Disabling this pkgng tag leads to reinstallation of missing packages, >> which are store in the pkgng sqlite format and not as ASCII anymore, but >> then I get >> /var/runld-elf.so.hints: No such file or directory > > Is this a typo, or literal transcription? (The missing "/" between > 'run' and 'ld-elf.so.hints', that is.) A typo, sorry. I had to type it from the screen of the broken box to the laptop. > >> Error: shared library "iconv.3" does not exist. >> >> But most of the libs have never been touch! So what is the loader >> complaining about? >> >> Well, I'm floating like a dead man in the water and I'm glad that one >> box survided although suffering from the same symptomes. >> >> I tried to find rescue images and a rescue DVD of a snap shot server, >> but there is no way to crawl through the informations on the web pages >> towards a snapshot. All folders end up in 2011 and highly outdated >> (www.freebsd.org, I didn't look at mirrors since I thought the main >> server carries the most recent stuff). This isn't funny. No lead, no >> hint, even in the download section. >> > > Yes, I have been complaining about this for a while now... This is a so unneccessary issue. Why are people bothering themselfs with hiding a bit of information? If one isn't a cold-blood developer aware of all the neat knobs of FBSD and where to ask and where to look, a novice or not-so-well-informed guy like me run into frustration. The main page should have a hint present, where to find the newest stuff. Leaving the officiela page the way it is at the moment in this specific issue, it looks a bit "unmaintained" ... > >> If someone has some hints how to recompile the sources with an emergency >> booted disk, I highly appreciate some desater advice. Maybe the release >> of FreeBSD-10-CURRENT sources I compiled do have accidentally a nasty >> bug, so it would be nice to update the sources and have a complete >> recompilation done. >> > > If you can get booted into a recovery medium, you can mount /usr/src and > /usr/obj from the hosed system, and should be able to > installworld/installkernel into the hosed system with DESTDIR set. > > Glen > I do this the very moment with the RELEASE CD I found at allbsd.org for the most recent FBSD 10.0-CURRENT as from 16.08.2012. I try to build the sources and install them into the mounted DESTDIR. Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 11:08:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC63106564A; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:08:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onyx.glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:c200::face]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC008FC12; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:08:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:8:1205:2:2:0:44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by onyx.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 924EB23F3D4; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:08:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:08:38 -0400 From: Glen Barber To: "Hartmann, O." Message-ID: <20120817110838.GA1623@glenbarber.us> References: <502D12C0.2060405@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20120816154424.GE1303@glenbarber.us> <502DF668.5000904@zedat.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <502DF668.5000904@zedat.fu-berlin.de> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD Current , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:08:45 -0000 On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 09:44:40AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > >> An installation failed due to pkg(ng) was missing libarchive.so via > > > > There is pkg-static for recovering in this type of situation. > > Oh ... I'm new to pkg(ng). > No worries. It is a nice thing to know about, since after a big shlib bump during an upgrade, if all else is broken, you can still at least get /rescue stuff and pkg-static to upgrade third party software. > >> If someone has some hints how to recompile the sources with an emergency > >> booted disk, I highly appreciate some desater advice. Maybe the release > >> of FreeBSD-10-CURRENT sources I compiled do have accidentally a nasty > >> bug, so it would be nice to update the sources and have a complete > >> recompilation done. > >> > > > > If you can get booted into a recovery medium, you can mount /usr/src and > > /usr/obj from the hosed system, and should be able to > > installworld/installkernel into the hosed system with DESTDIR set. > > > > I do this the very moment with the RELEASE CD I found at allbsd.org for > the most recent FBSD 10.0-CURRENT as from 16.08.2012. I try to build the > sources and install them into the mounted DESTDIR. > I have lately been creating memstick images for this exact type of thing. On -CURRENT and 9-STABLE, you can do: # make -C /usr/src buildworld buildkernel # make -C /usr/src/release NOSRC=yes NODOCS=yes NOPORTS=yes memstick Then take the resulting memory stick image to use for recovery. Glen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 07:45:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C9B1065806 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:45:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kia00000@rambler.ru) Received: from mailf.rambler.ru (mailf.rambler.ru [81.19.66.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EDC8FC14 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from john-74c2360b29 (unknown [213.87.129.2]) (Authenticated sender: kia00000@rambler.ru) by mailf.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 40A9E5651D for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:44:56 +0400 (MSK) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r; format=flowed; delsp=yes References: Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:44:58 +0400 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Base64 From: =?koi8-r?B?y9XazsXDz9cgydfBzg==?= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.50 (Win32) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:24:06 +0000 Subject: Fwd: docs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:45:03 -0000 DQoNCi0tLS0tLS0g8MXSxdPZzMHFzc/FINPPz8Ldxc7JxSAtLS0tLS0tDQrv1Dog IsvV2s7Fw8/XIMnXwc4iIDxraWEwMDAwMEByYW1ibGVyLnJ1Pg0K68/N1TogZnJl ZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcNCuvP0MnROg0K9MXNwTogZG9jcw0K 5MHUwTogVHVlLCAxNCBBdWcgMjAxMiAxMDo0NToxMyArMDQwMA0KDQoNCmhvdyB0 byBvcGVuIFJVX0ZSRUVCU0RfRE9DXzIwMTExMDE0LlRCWiB1bmRlciB3aW5kb3dz PyBzZXZlcmFsIHByb2dyYW0NCmNhbnQsaSB3YXMgYXR0ZW1wdC43emlwIGNhbnQu DQoNCg0KLS0gDQruwdDJ08HOzyDXINDP3tTP18/NIMvMycXO1MUgwtLB1drF0sEg T3BlcmE6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cub3BlcmEuY29tL21haWwv From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 07:45:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA8E1065807 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:45:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kia00000@rambler.ru) Received: from mailf.rambler.ru (mailf.rambler.ru [81.19.66.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E7A8FC12 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from john-74c2360b29 (unknown [213.87.129.2]) (Authenticated sender: kia00000@rambler.ru) by mailf.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 574D7564E3 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:44:55 +0400 (MSK) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:44:55 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Base64 From: =?koi8-r?B?y9XazsXDz9cgydfBzg==?= Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.50 (Win32) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:24:22 +0000 Subject: docs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:45:03 -0000 DQpob3cgdG8gb3BlbiBSVV9GUkVFQlNEX0RPQ18yMDExMTAxNC5UQlogdW5kZXIg d2luZG93cz8gc2V2ZXJhbCBwcm9ncmFtICANCmNhbnQsaSB3YXMgYXR0ZW1wdC43 emlwIGNhbnQuDQotLSANCu7B0MnTwc7PINcg0M/e1M/Xz80gy8zJxc7UxSDC0sHV 2sXSwSBPcGVyYTogaHR0cDovL3d3dy5vcGVyYS5jb20vbWFpbC8= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 09:25:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1688C106566B for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kia00000@rambler.ru) Received: from mx-out-wr-2.rambler.ru (mx-out-wr-2.rambler.ru [81.19.92.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B790A8FC1A for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from saddam3.rambler.ru (saddam3.rambler.ru [10.32.16.3]) by mx-out-wr-2.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB4F7E270E for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:17:42 +0400 (MSK) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saddam3.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438A02306C3 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:17:42 +0400 (MSK) Received: from [213.87.128.33] by saddam3.rambler.ru with HTTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:17:42 +0400 From: =?koi8-r?B?ydfBziDL1drOxcPP1w==?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:17:42 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Message-Id: <1345195062.601.29947.38439@saddam3.rambler.ru> X-Mailer: Rambler WebMail, http://mail.rambler.ru/ X-Rambler-User: kia00000@rambler.ru/213.87.128.33 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rambler.ru; s=dkim; t=1345195062; bh=Bbnvx7IOxRkorUVEdGAs8oq7Tz21k/W4e+s+di05uRo=; h=From:To:Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Message-Id; b=F1HhSeGJ5fTpLW74qjuWs24Q6zhgbYejCh2b5+1XurXpYa1WAg/kzTWHOpSBE0wlG Dx6EIU/ASCv3bnuUJcoF1OeLuIrr1A74vP6wC9O5DUiltTk3XvIwMX2OwV4clY7gqC 6XncRsJatqrqfPXJemDOFHrVVShnXf3bGVqAHwQA= X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:30:21 +0000 Subject: doc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?koi8-r?B?ydfBziDL1drOxcPP1w==?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:25:13 -0000 =0D how to open RU_FREEBSD_DOC_20111014.TBZ under windows? several program cant= ,i was attempt.7zip cant. why i not able read documentation BEFORE install?= where it after install? second,you installer is not well, not very undersa= ndingable for newbis.i mean user must hit tab in some dialogs,but he press = enter - attempt please.it is not MISTAKE but look mysteriously,and user wor= ry.you shoud do only one small step in order to do freebsd more frendly - p= ublish full international docs on install dvd -- user only put dvd and see = docs in browser.its simpler than rewriting os in order to div it more frend= ly.is it true flash work badly or after complex work? i cant write on my wr= itemaster dvd drive with freebsd9 - brasero dont see drive.what you can say= about it? with best regards,ivan,Russia,Moscow.=0D =0D =0D =D0=B8=D0=B2=D0=B0=D0=BD =D0=BA=D1=83=D0=B7=D0=BD=D0=B5=D1=86=D0=BE=D0=B2.= =0D > =0D From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 11:31:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11BD106566B for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:31:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rosettas@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C128FC1F for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:31:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so3730628qcs.13 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:31:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ak61C6U4GSxmVJE6n/7OddiAdBYldADyekdNPs9iRZI=; b=uzefO02tzLiruzNpTNUrogLXddS2X+ZSSUnTItxuFRabQznH6PjNBVv/dJa7fEh9r8 0sHsJJ+Qp8OZpcTxLl3nnSzVnpTq9h4W+x6uRZ4kbELgQk4J+qBOaNNNOLBWPOl8EN0n nsdMEEpMN9zDIQtkumNn9jt0oUTutVGmsL6o4mzgKCSud1Z4HwktIVsE1Ko3pTwCK9zS F4CAsi3A/ylur/2/ROsyCBNeRI4CpmI6DfIHqi6uEObHzA6KwSubAM0E1DpdIsdMKbvf 1fUFuGxWqrzAQC40gEZDIpXX/5yn12zWH6QDzvScBg7HzIJqTDki+xYgpzqXg5nj8ETW RP5A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.151.197 with SMTP id us5mr2397483veb.14.1345203112028; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:31:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.73.162 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:31:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:31:52 +0200 Message-ID: From: Cos To: =?KOI8-R?B?y9XazsXDz9cgydfBzg==?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: docs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:31:58 -0000 2012/8/17 =CB=D5=DA=CE=C5=C3=CF=D7 =C9=D7=C1=CE > > > > ------- =F0=C5=D2=C5=D3=D9=CC=C1=C5=CD=CF=C5 =D3=CF=CF=C2=DD=C5=CE=C9=C5 = ------- > =EF=D4: "=CB=D5=DA=CE=C5=C3=CF=D7 =C9=D7=C1=CE" > =EB=CF=CD=D5: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > =EB=CF=D0=C9=D1: > =F4=C5=CD=C1: docs > =E4=C1=D4=C1: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:45:13 +0400 > > > > how to open RU_FREEBSD_DOC_20111014.TBZ under windows? several program > cant,i was attempt.7zip cant. > > Please try powerarchiver > > -- > =EE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CE=CF =D7 =D0=CF=DE=D4=CF=D7=CF=CD =CB=CC=C9=C5=CE=D4= =C5 =C2=D2=C1=D5=DA=C5=D2=C1 Opera: http://www.opera.com/mail/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" -- with kind regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 12:43:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7141065672 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:43:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: from macmini.kode5.net (kontrol.kode5.net [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C678FC08 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by macmini.kode5.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D8541693B for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:08:34 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kode5.net Received: from macmini.kode5.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (macmini.kode5.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aPOlgzZ2jMcb for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:08:33 +0100 (BST) Received: by macmini.kode5.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id 76E6A41692E; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:08:33 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:08:33 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120813070833.GA54353@macmini.kode5.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120813053621.24629.qmail@joyce.lan> <20120813054152.26495.qmail@joyce.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120813054152.26495.qmail@joyce.lan> x-operating-system: Darwin 11.4.0 x86_64 x-pgp-fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: Firefox 14.0.1 won't build under 8.3 on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:43:01 -0000 == John Levine wrote on Mon 13.Aug'12 at 5:41:52 -0000 == > Oops, it's 14.0.1 I'm trying to build. 13.0.0.1 is what I have installed now. > > In article <20120813053621.24629.qmail@joyce.lan> you write: did you select the option to use optimised CFLAGS when you run make config in the port directory? I remember I had this problem on 8.2 earlier this year/last year and deselecting that option made it build. I don't know if that has been fixed/changed since I built that port and it was for an earlier version of firefox. I recall the same was true for Thunderbird at that time. You try that first? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 14:45:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467EB106564A for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:45:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D258FC0A for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:45:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T2No9-0002T9-Hc for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:45:53 +0200 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:45:53 +0200 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:45:53 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:45:43 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 6 Message-ID: References: <20120817014818.68279be3.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 30dc37b master) Subject: Re: freebsd-update and csup - I'm going around in circles. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:45:55 -0000 On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 01:48:18 +0200, Polytropon wrote: < snip problem and comprehensive answer > That's really helpful. Very many thanks, Polytropon. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 16:54:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3D9106564A for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kickbsd@yandex.ru) Received: from forward4h.mail.yandex.net (forward4h.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f05::4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04438FC0A for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web30h.yandex.ru (web30h.yandex.ru [84.201.187.164]) by forward4h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 93A811B231E4 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:54:47 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by web30h.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 4A1B030C8283; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:54:47 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1345222487; bh=Ld9FY7uV6iFXRgzkk6LVwZjPngCPfMJLTNIiC355mjg=; h=From:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type; b=sPK9llwZz/stxDCs7jSbiIYYkszjQvz0Di0U1qs0odNaPdiZAoX+Zh1FGeNp7OklB 5b92zXPqwRusb2cX3WJMpyTmAiJHXosEY1s7jsJ6bbG72bqep5ei4bK6DSI3fUArmm H1CffnHx7y1DxJJgpSQCCy3FO5dlOH2Nq7K2SxWk= Received: from dsl-69-172-89-127.acanac.net (dsl-69-172-89-127.acanac.net [69.172.89.127]) by web30h.yandex.ru with HTTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:54:47 +0400 From: Darren Baginski To: FreeBSD Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <797511345222487@web30h.yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:54:47 +0400 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain Subject: ToS marking in pf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:54:49 -0000 Hi list! Could you please point me how can I set DSCP/TOS bits for outgoing packets using pf ? I would like to mark all packets going to the specific port marked with DSCP CS3. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 19:51:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CCA106566B; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:51:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773878FC0C; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q7HJp8O3003414; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:51:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <502EA0AB.9050708@dreamchaser.org> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:51:07 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Matthew Seaman References: <502C7AFB.2020303@dreamchaser.org> <502C8D88.9040901@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <502C8D88.9040901@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:51:09 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Subject: Re: 9.0 release hang in quiescent X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:51:16 -0000 On 08/16/12 00:04, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 16/08/2012 05:45, Gary Aitken wrote: ... >> Running 9.0 release on an amd 64 box, standard kernel, 16GB, SSD (/, >> /usr, /var, /tmp) + HDDs, visiontek 900331 graphics card (ati radeon >> hd5550). >> >> As long as I am using the system, things seem to be fine. However, >> when I leave the system idle for an extended period of time (e.g. >> overnight, out for the day, etc.), it often refuses to return from >> whatever state it is in. The screen is blank and in standby for >> power saving, and Fn won't get me a console prompt. The >> only way I know to recover is to power off and reboot. ... >> Can someone suggest a good way to proceed to figure out what's going >> on? > > Can you get network access to the machine when it gets into this state? I enabled remote logins and when the system hangs, I can neither log in nor ping it. I can do both of those prior to a hang. > If you can't, that suggests the OS is hanging or crashing, possibly in > response to going into some sort of power-saving mode. > > As to working out what the underlying cause of the problem is: that's > harder. I'd try experimenting with the power saving settings for your > graphics display. If you can turn them off as a test, and the machine > then survives for an extended period of idleness, you'll have gone a > long way towards isolating the problem. My display, a NEC multisync LCD 1970NX, has a menu item for "Off Timer" but it is set to "off" As far as I can tell there are no other power saving options on the display itself. Could this be related to the sync rates? I'm using whatever X.org and the drivers decided to come up with, which is 63.9kHz H, 59.9Hz V. I have the following in rc.conf: powerd_enable="YES" # Run powerd to lower our power usage. powerd_flags="-a hiadaptive -n hiadaptive -p 250" I presume screen blanking is independent of cpu frequency rates, but it's not clear to me how the screen blanking is controlled. How does screen blanking interact with BIOS? My screen blanks, but it's not clear to me if it's BIOS or the os that's doing it. man acpi indicates acpi should not be disabled: "Disabling all or part of ACPI on non-i386 platforms (i.e., platforms where ACPI support is mandatory) may result in a non-functional system." On 08/16/12 00:06, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > Are you running any kind of screensaver ? > Sometimes the OpenGL screen saver modules crash without proper > hardware support. If you're running a screensaver try disabling it and just > using display blanking. I'm not running a screensaver, just blanking the screen. Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 20:19:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD4D106566B for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:19:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8858FC14 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q7HKJ8bw003491 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:19:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <502EA73B.6000008@dreamchaser.org> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:19:07 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:19:08 -0600 (MDT) Subject: fsck recoveries, configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:19:11 -0000 When my system hangs and I have to force it to power cycle, I sometimes have some fsck issues. So some questions: 1. It appears to me that the file system (ufs) is not writing stuff out when things are idle. If I do a sync manually and leave the machine idle and it crashes later, it comes up clean. If I don't do a sync manually and it crashes later, it often comes up needing fsck. Is there a way to configure the filesystem to cache but still write cached stuff at low priority? 2. When my machine hung (could not rlogin or ping), I powered off and rebooted. Reboot did a deferred fsck. After it booted I logged in, and also logged in on another system. On the remote system I could do a ping but rlogin returned "connection reset by peer", even though I could log in locally. I presume that is because the background fscks were not complete? I then did a ps ax | grep fsck and saw only the "logger" process for the deferred fsck's. I did a man logger which appeared to hang -- no output. I'm guessing because it needed the filesystems which hadn't yet fsck'd. I then attempted to switch consoles using fn but could not. I then attempted to kill the man logger process using ^C with no success. Can someone shed light on the above sequence of events? It's highly likely some of them occurred before the 60 second delay for fsck timed out, but I'd like to understand what the heck is going on. Thanks, Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 20:44:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2420106566C; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:44:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586878FC21; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:44:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7HKi1ZS062340; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:44:01 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q7HKi107062337; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:44:01 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:44:01 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Gary Aitken In-Reply-To: <502EA0AB.9050708@dreamchaser.org> Message-ID: References: <502C7AFB.2020303@dreamchaser.org> <502C8D88.9040901@FreeBSD.org> <502EA0AB.9050708@dreamchaser.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:44:01 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9.0 release hang in quiescent X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:44:10 -0000 On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Gary Aitken wrote: > On 08/16/12 00:04, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 16/08/2012 05:45, Gary Aitken wrote: > ... >>> Running 9.0 release on an amd 64 box, standard kernel, 16GB, SSD (/, >>> /usr, /var, /tmp) + HDDs, visiontek 900331 graphics card (ati radeon >>> hd5550). >>> >>> As long as I am using the system, things seem to be fine. However, >>> when I leave the system idle for an extended period of time (e.g. >>> overnight, out for the day, etc.), it often refuses to return from >>> whatever state it is in. The screen is blank and in standby for >>> power saving, and Fn won't get me a console prompt. The >>> only way I know to recover is to power off and reboot. > ... >>> Can someone suggest a good way to proceed to figure out what's going >>> on? >> >> Can you get network access to the machine when it gets into this state? > > I enabled remote logins and when the system hangs, I can neither log in nor ping it. I can do both of those prior to a hang. > >> If you can't, that suggests the OS is hanging or crashing, possibly in >> response to going into some sort of power-saving mode. >> >> As to working out what the underlying cause of the problem is: that's >> harder. I'd try experimenting with the power saving settings for your >> graphics display. If you can turn them off as a test, and the machine >> then survives for an extended period of idleness, you'll have gone a >> long way towards isolating the problem. > > My display, a NEC multisync LCD 1970NX, has a menu item for "Off Timer" but it is set to "off" As far as I can tell there are no other power saving options on the display itself. > > Could this be related to the sync rates? I'm using whatever X.org and the drivers decided to come up with, which is 63.9kHz H, 59.9Hz V. > > I have the following in rc.conf: > powerd_enable="YES" # Run powerd to lower our power usage. > powerd_flags="-a hiadaptive -n hiadaptive -p 250" > > I presume screen blanking is independent of cpu frequency rates, but it's not clear to me how the screen blanking is controlled. How does screen blanking interact with BIOS? My screen blanks, but it's not clear to me if it's BIOS or the os that's doing it. Yes, screen blanking is unrelated to current CPU speed. powerd is probably not responsible. The first test would be just to disable screen blanking in X: In xorg.conf, ServerLayout section: Option "BlankTime" "0" Option "StandbyTime" "0" Option "SuspendTime" "0" Option "OffTime" "0" If that stops the lockups, then you could try setting each in turn to a non-zero value (minutes). Leave everything at zero except for the one being tested. But these also seem unlikely, as it's a hardware signal from the video board to the monitor. The suggestion of an X screensaver causing the lockup was excellent. Even if you have no screensavers, there are other things that could be triggered, like xlock. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 20:48:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0B2106566C for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB67E8FC0A for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.199.104]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:48:28 -0700 Message-ID: <502EAE18.4040002@a1poweruser.com> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:48:24 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Aug 2012 20:48:28.0651 (UTC) FILETIME=[A79D4BB0:01CD7CB9] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Subject: handbook pkg name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:48:34 -0000 What is the pkg name of the English version of 9.0 handbook? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 00:20:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD15106566C for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:20:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376FA8FC0A for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-32-97.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.32.97]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98915276F8; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:19:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7I0JsiW002624; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:19:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:19:54 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Fbsd8 Message-Id: <20120818021954.2d51e34f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <502EAE18.4040002@a1poweruser.com> References: <502EAE18.4040002@a1poweruser.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: handbook pkg name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:20:02 -0000 On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:48:24 -0400, Fbsd8 wrote: > What is the pkg name of the English version of 9.0 handbook? It should be "en-freebsd-doc" or "freebsd-doc-en". -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 00:22:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F051106564A; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:22:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E678C8FC08; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q7I0MCOO004135; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 18:22:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <502EE033.8020402@dreamchaser.org> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 18:22:11 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block References: <502C7AFB.2020303@dreamchaser.org> <502C8D88.9040901@FreeBSD.org> <502EA0AB.9050708@dreamchaser.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 18:22:13 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9.0 release hang in quiescent X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:22:14 -0000 On 08/17/12 14:44, Warren Block wrote: > If that stops the lockups, then you could try setting each in turn to a non-zero value (minutes). Leave everything at zero except for the one being tested. But these also seem unlikely, as it's a hardware signal from the video board to the monitor. The suggestion of an X screensaver causing the lockup was excellent. Even if you have no screensavers, there are other things that could be triggered, like xlock. Not sure I understand what you're getting at. By "other things that could be triggered" what do you mean? e.g. xclock obviously gets "triggered" at least once per minute; you're suggesting that event could be causinging an update request while blanked out that is causing trouble? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 01:05:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4F8106568A for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 01:05:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D4D8FC08 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 01:05:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-32-97.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.32.97]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494413CEA2; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:05:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7I15bL1002998; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:05:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:05:37 +0200 From: Polytropon To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Message-Id: <20120818030537.4d5bf55b.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <502EA73B.6000008@dreamchaser.org> References: <502EA73B.6000008@dreamchaser.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: fsck recoveries, configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 01:05:45 -0000 On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:19:07 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote: > 1. It appears to me that the file system (ufs) is not writing > stuff out when things are idle. If I do a sync manually and > leave the machine idle and it crashes later, it comes up clean. > If I don't do a sync manually and it crashes later, it often > comes up needing fsck. Is there a way to configure the filesystem > to cache but still write cached stuff at low priority? Note that even if the OS orders a data write, it's up to the disk driver to actually tell the disk to do it. And the disk then _has_ to do it. There is no real "connection" (in time) for those components of the "task line", even though one would assume that they happen immediately. On a somewhat idle system, you could keep a process (e. g. top -S) running to check system processes that could be responsible for writes (or missing writes). > 2. When my machine hung (could not rlogin or ping), I powered > off and rebooted. Does the machine have a "soft power button" and it is configured to issue a "shutdown -p now" (which is quite common)? When you have access to the machine, try that. Even if the machine does not accept network logins, this mechanism might still work. > Reboot did a deferred fsck. Is this intended? Personally, I'd rather wait some time to boot in a fully checked file system environment then dealing with the uncertain situation of snapshots and background FS check activity. In worst case, I want to be prompted by fsck if a major defect has been found that requires administrator attention. Put background_fsck="NO" into /etc/rc.conf to get this behaviour. Note that as long as fsck is running, you can't enter any interactive commands, and it will happen _prior_ to allowing any network connections. Also note that this is in single user mode, so you can't switch VTs. > After it booted I logged in, and also logged in on another system. > On the remote system I could do a ping but rlogin returned > "connection reset by peer", even though I could log in locally. Does rlogin work when you "give the system some time to recover"? > I presume that is because the background fscks were not complete? Possible. Background fsck is uncertain per se, so for diagnostics better leave it aside and use the maybe "less comfortable" method. This is easy when you have local access to the machine in question. > I then did a > ps ax | grep fsck > and saw only the "logger" process for the deferred fsck's. > I did a > man logger > which appeared to hang -- no output. I'm guessing because it needed > the filesystems which hadn't yet fsck'd. Just a guess: Maybe you're experiencing a file system defect and fsck, even though running in background, needs an input? I'm not really sure about this, because I'm _intendedly_ not using fsck that way. > I then attempted to switch consoles using > fn > but could not. That would imply you're still stuck in SUM. A strange constellation given that it appears that you have fsck running in background. > I then attempted to kill the man logger process using ^C with no success. Waiting / hanging process? > Can someone shed light on the above sequence of events? It's highly > likely some of them occurred before the 60 second delay for fsck > timed out, but I'd like to understand what the heck is going on. Try to construct a more _defined_ situation for further diagnostics. Also you could boot the system up in SUM (use "boot -s") and then perform fsck manually, just to make sure your disks are fine. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 01:44:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3728B106564A for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 01:44:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74568FC15 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 01:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-32-97.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.32.97]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26842777F; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:43:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7I1hxMU003297; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:43:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:43:58 +0200 From: Polytropon To: =?UTF-8?B?0LjQstCw0L0g0LrRg9C30L3QtdGG0L7Qsg==?= Message-Id: <20120818034358.dd0562d1.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1345195062.601.29947.38439@saddam3.rambler.ru> References: <1345195062.601.29947.38439@saddam3.rambler.ru> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: doc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 01:44:02 -0000 On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:17:42 +0400, иван кузнецов wrote: > how to open RU_FREEBSD_DOC_20111014.TBZ under windows? The file is a tar archive compressed with BZip2. It's no real surprise that "Windows" cannot natively handle it, as with many established standard formats. :-) > several program cant,i was attempt.7zip cant. It's not a 7zip archive; still the 7zip page on http://7-zip.org/ mentions that the BZip2 format is supported. However, there's BZip2 available for "Windows", maybe this can help you: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/bzip2.htm There are also claims that "WinRAR" is able to extract BZip2 files. > why i not able read documentation BEFORE install? I'd refer to the documentation presented on FreeBSD's web page. You can easily create a local copy of the HTML subtree using wget (and yes, there's WGET.EXE even for "Windows"). The most important pages are: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ http://www.freebsd.org/doc/faq/ Check out FreeBSD's main web page for language selection. Here you can find a russian translation of all those documents: http://www.freebsd.org/ru/docs.html Again, it's possible to make a local copy of them which you could carry on a USB stick or CD for further reference. > where it after install? It will be installed into /usr/doc, containing the language variants and formats. > second,you installer is not well, not very undersandingable for newbis. I don't think so. It's very precise in wording and easy to use. You just have to read what's on the screen and answer accordingly. A help function is also included. > i mean user must hit tab in some dialogs,but he press enter - > attempt please. The keyboard support is explained in the first help pages. It's also mentioned in the Handbook which one should read before or even while performing the install (if one is unsure about how the interface works). > it is not MISTAKE but look mysteriously,and user worry. That's quite possible. :-) Users feeling unhappy with the FreeBSD installer often tend to prefer PC-BSD with its GUI installer and a more lengthly "step by step" guide through the installation with much more interactivity and user attention. As this interface can be used with a mouse, the distinction between TAB and ENTER is not that important anymore. > you shoud do only one small step in order to do freebsd more > frendly - publish full international docs on install dvd -- > user only put dvd and see docs in browser. How is a user supposed to have a browser available when putting the CD into a system he wants to install it on, with _nothing_ on the hard disk? I agree that the documentation could be accessible via a web browser from the install media when used in a _different_ computer, and maybe it should also be accessible in text form during an early stage of the installer. However, the purpose of an installation medium is to install something. The installer does exactly that. > its simpler than rewriting os in order to div it more frendly. The OS has basically nothing to do with its installer or the way help is presented to the user. This is done by programs, _those_ could be extended or changed. > is it true flash work badly or after complex work? No. Outdated stuff like "Flash" can be quickly and easily installed, and it works reliably and stable. > i cant write on my writemaster dvd drive with freebsd9 - brasero > dont see drive. Can you provide more information, e. g. what model, how connected, output of dmesg and so on? Please check the Handbook regarding the use of optical media. Start with "low level diagnostics" (i. e. use OS tools to first check if the drive is detected and attached to the correct driver), in a next step maybe check your Gnome and Brasero configuration. If it fails, try a command line tool. Those are typically easier to use and more comfortable. > what you can say about it? with best regards,ivan,Russia,Moscow. MHOrO YCnEXOB! ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 02:00:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211B6106564A; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:00:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF2F8FC0A; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:00:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7I20TFU001354; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:00:29 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q7I20Rfl001351; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:00:29 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:00:27 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Gary Aitken In-Reply-To: <502EE033.8020402@dreamchaser.org> Message-ID: References: <502C7AFB.2020303@dreamchaser.org> <502C8D88.9040901@FreeBSD.org> <502EA0AB.9050708@dreamchaser.org> <502EE033.8020402@dreamchaser.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:00:29 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9.0 release hang in quiescent X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:00:33 -0000 On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Gary Aitken wrote: > On 08/17/12 14:44, Warren Block wrote: > >> If that stops the lockups, then you could try setting each in turn to >> a non-zero value (minutes). Leave everything at zero except for the >> one being tested. But these also seem unlikely, as it's a hardware >> signal from the video board to the monitor. The suggestion of an X >> screensaver causing the lockup was excellent. Even if you have no >> screensavers, there are other things that could be triggered, like >> xlock. > > Not sure I understand what you're getting at. By "other things that > could be triggered" what do you mean? e.g. xclock obviously gets > "triggered" at least once per minute; you're suggesting that event > could be causinging an update request while blanked out that is > causing trouble? Other long-term events that happen might be to blame, not related to screen blanking at all. For example, a cron job. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 02:29:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5268C106564A; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:29:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from navarre.matthew@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D798FC08; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so4519009pbb.13 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:29:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=93L0YFKoE+4seVbS9yKrzmJ9PSxnJ6RpKX9WBoVMHe4=; b=yGE7tezBzW+Dz6Y5FMISE4YAgOEu+RON5N8iinwgBuMyPvIyh3dCoJvabEpynuT7eO XdQenK16icay0LqPSGaIks++WsDhCP4IHUvM8dY/AlEBrY+xoPHxfzMt7M3FWesWPAEF igN+35BMQ/anvIpelxHoz2KUyAG89ILKQzkwvZAY68bGmxyp6gYHWkoe4aaMMldU9yEc LA9L05WgOUbsBmETsqo+fCW9J+bdadTmk2xF5/0ikXsQzfhTIeoWk8GEJ3DPahaeYdzj zC9R3Oh/ZXHkYcAAedvKvc6gC9cUih/bWcm2MK7a9zgHP2OzUw65MzWrZkRdRZn5ppby WKyg== Received: by 10.68.241.99 with SMTP id wh3mr16398703pbc.16.1345256998173; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.42.21] (wsip-70-166-27-207.sd.sd.cox.net. [70.166.27.207]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id oj8sm6073227pbb.54.2012.08.17.19.29.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:29:57 -0700 (PDT) References: <502C7AFB.2020303@dreamchaser.org> <502C8D88.9040901@FreeBSD.org> <502EA0AB.9050708@dreamchaser.org> <502EE033.8020402@dreamchaser.org> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <2884687D-E263-4E07-A013-BCA1CEC7E9E6@gmail.com> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B206) From: Matthew Navarre Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:29:53 -0700 To: Warren Block Cc: Gary Aitken , Matthew Seaman , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: 9.0 release hang in quiescent X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:29:59 -0000 On Aug 17, 2012, at 7:00 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Gary Aitken wrote: >=20 >> On 08/17/12 14:44, Warren Block wrote: >>=20 >>> If that stops the lockups, then you could try setting each in turn to a n= on-zero value (minutes). Leave everything at zero except for the one being t= ested. But these also seem unlikely, as it's a hardware signal from the vid= eo board to the monitor. The suggestion of an X screensaver causing the loc= kup was excellent. Even if you have no screensavers, there are other things= that could be triggered, like xlock. >>=20 >> Not sure I understand what you're getting at. By "other things that coul= d be triggered" what do you mean? e.g. xclock obviously gets "triggered" at= least once per minute; you're suggesting that event could be causinging an u= pdate request while blanked out that is causing trouble? >=20 > Other long-term events that happen might be to blame, not related to scree= n blanking at all. For example, a cron job. Just as a data point, I had the same thing happen on PC-BSD 9.0. The system w= ould hang after just a couple minutes of inactivity, but would wake up again= on keyboard input. Top showed X.org taking 100% of CPU and load averages go= t up to some seriously ridiculous levels. The workaround I found was to turn= off the "Dim Screen" option in KDE. Never filed a bug report, since I didn'= t know if it was FreeBSD, PC-BSD or X.org. OK, MCN= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 02:44:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B57106566B for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:44:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FB78FC0A for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q7I2iC4d004498; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:44:12 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <502F017A.7030001@dreamchaser.org> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:44:10 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <502EA73B.6000008@dreamchaser.org> <20120818030537.4d5bf55b.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120818030537.4d5bf55b.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:44:12 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: fsck recoveries, configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:44:19 -0000 On 08/17/12 19:05, Polytropon wrote: >> 2. When my machine hung (could not rlogin or ping), I powered >> off and rebooted. > > Does the machine have a "soft power button" and it is configured > to issue a "shutdown -p now" (which is quite common)? When you > have access to the machine, try that. Even if the machine does > not accept network logins, this mechanism might still work. Hmmm. It has a "soft" power button; have to hold it down 5 sec or so to power off. Those things can be configured to issue a command that will actually get executed without a login? I assume you're talking about a bios option? How does that work? sounds like magic of some sort... Or is this a whole login sequence with the shutdown at the end? >> Reboot did a deferred fsck. > > Is this intended? Personally, I'd rather wait some time to boot > in a fully checked file system environment then dealing with the > uncertain situation of snapshots and background FS check activity. > In worst case, I want to be prompted by fsck if a major defect has > been found that requires administrator attention. > > Put > > background_fsck="NO" > > into /etc/rc.conf to get this behaviour. Yeah, I came to that conclusion... Thanks. >> After it booted I logged in, and also logged in on another system. >> On the remote system I could do a ping but rlogin returned >> "connection reset by peer", even though I could log in locally. > > Does rlogin work when you "give the system some time to recover"? yes, if it's not hung -- i.e. done with fsck, I think. I verified that by monitoring the delayed fsck process and as soon as it was done the rlogin worked. >> I then attempted to switch consoles using >> fn >> but could not. > > That would imply you're still stuck in SUM. A strange constellation > given that it appears that you have fsck running in background. > It seems to me this is always the case -- delayed fsck waits 60 seconds by default to start. During that time the system has come up multi-user, so it's trivial to be logged in under multi-user mode with fsck running. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 03:03:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC2D106566B; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:03:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46738FC15; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q7I334tL004551; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 21:03:04 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <502F05E7.3080301@dreamchaser.org> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 21:03:03 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Navarre References: <502C7AFB.2020303@dreamchaser.org> <502C8D88.9040901@FreeBSD.org> <502EA0AB.9050708@dreamchaser.org> <502EE033.8020402@dreamchaser.org> <2884687D-E263-4E07-A013-BCA1CEC7E9E6@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2884687D-E263-4E07-A013-BCA1CEC7E9E6@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 21:03:05 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Matthew Seaman , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: 9.0 release hang in quiescent X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:03:05 -0000 On 08/17/12 20:29, Matthew Navarre wrote: > > > On Aug 17, 2012, at 7:00 PM, Warren Block wrote: > >> On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Gary Aitken wrote: >> >>> On 08/17/12 14:44, Warren Block wrote: >>> >>>> If that stops the lockups, then you could try setting each in turn to a non-zero value (minutes). Leave everything at zero except for the one being tested. But these also seem unlikely, as it's a hardware signal from the video board to the monitor. The suggestion of an X screensaver causing the lockup was excellent. Even if you have no screensavers, there are other things that could be triggered, like xlock. >>> >>> Not sure I understand what you're getting at. By "other things that could be triggered" what do you mean? e.g. xclock obviously gets "triggered" at least once per minute; you're suggesting that event could be causinging an update request while blanked out that is causing trouble? >> >> Other long-term events that happen might be to blame, not related to screen blanking at all. For example, a cron job. > > Just as a data point, I had the same thing happen on PC-BSD 9.0. The system would hang after just a couple minutes of inactivity, but would wake up again on keyboard input. Top showed X.org taking 100% of CPU and load averages got up to some seriously ridiculous levels. The workaround I found was to turn off the "Dim Screen" option in KDE. Never filed a bug report, since I didn't know if it was FreeBSD, PC-BSD or X.org. That's not my issue; what I'm seeing is a screen that never wakes up; or, more accurately, a system which appears to have crashed completely, since I can't rlogin either. I would guess the high load averages you saw may be related to everything in the world woken up at the same time for repaints. I would expect x.org to take 100% of cpu when woken up. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 03:17:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078161065672 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:17:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0038FC14 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-32-97.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.32.97]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4193CE60; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 05:17:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7I3HGZd003654; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 05:17:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 05:17:16 +0200 From: Polytropon To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Message-Id: <20120818051716.40ccf88c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <502F017A.7030001@dreamchaser.org> References: <502EA73B.6000008@dreamchaser.org> <20120818030537.4d5bf55b.freebsd@edvax.de> <502F017A.7030001@dreamchaser.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: fsck recoveries, configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:17:20 -0000 On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:44:10 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote: > On 08/17/12 19:05, Polytropon wrote: > >> 2. When my machine hung (could not rlogin or ping), I powered > >> off and rebooted. > > > > Does the machine have a "soft power button" and it is configured > > to issue a "shutdown -p now" (which is quite common)? When you > > have access to the machine, try that. Even if the machine does > > not accept network logins, this mechanism might still work. > > Hmmm. It has a "soft" power button; have to hold it down 5 sec > or so to power off. That's the "override time" for a "hard power off". If you only press it once, it should issue "shutdown -p now", but of course this only works if the system is still responding. Even if the keyboard input and screen output, as well as networking services stopped to work, this _might_ still be effective. > Those things can be configured to issue a command that will actually > get executed without a login? Sure, it has been working for many years. Check the BIOS setup, some machines can be configured to what the button does. The default setup of FreeBSD should perform the correct action via ACPI. In the past, it also worked with APM. In that case, /etc/apmd.conf would contain the command executed when the button was pressed. On APM-capable machines, the PSU would be switched off, just like today's ACPI-based systems. Of course that only works with ATX power supplies, the AT ones usually had a mechanical switch. > I assume you're talking about a bios option? How does that work? I've seen BIOS setups allowing different actions for the button, from "go to sleep" to "soft power off" or "hard power off". That action (hard power off) is taken when pressing the button for about 5 seconds. The OS can NOT deal with that case. > sounds like magic of some sort... Or is this a whole login > sequence with the shutdown at the end? No, it's a system action using ACPI. No magic involved. :-) > >> Reboot did a deferred fsck. > > > > Is this intended? Personally, I'd rather wait some time to boot > > in a fully checked file system environment then dealing with the > > uncertain situation of snapshots and background FS check activity. > > In worst case, I want to be prompted by fsck if a major defect has > > been found that requires administrator attention. > > > > Put > > > > background_fsck="NO" > > > > into /etc/rc.conf to get this behaviour. > > Yeah, I came to that conclusion... Thanks. I _know_ booting a system may take time when the file system needs repair, but you have to set your priorities: I prefer waiting 20 minutes instead of running stuff on a damaged file system. > >> After it booted I logged in, and also logged in on another system. > >> On the remote system I could do a ping but rlogin returned > >> "connection reset by peer", even though I could log in locally. > > > > Does rlogin work when you "give the system some time to recover"? > > yes, if it's not hung -- i.e. done with fsck, I think. I verified > that by monitoring the delayed fsck process and as soon as it was > done the rlogin worked. It seems that background fsck stops certain services from working... interesting; another reason for me to avoid it when possible. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 04:14:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3FE1065672 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 04:14:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FA58FC0A for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 04:14:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q7I4EmQB004745; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 22:14:48 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <502F16B7.8050902@dreamchaser.org> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 22:14:47 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <502EA73B.6000008@dreamchaser.org> <20120818030537.4d5bf55b.freebsd@edvax.de> <502F017A.7030001@dreamchaser.org> <20120818051716.40ccf88c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120818051716.40ccf88c.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 22:14:49 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: fsck recoveries, configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 04:14:53 -0000 On 08/17/12 21:17, Polytropon wrote: > On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:44:10 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote: >> On 08/17/12 19:05, Polytropon wrote: >>>> 2. When my machine hung (could not rlogin or ping), I powered >>>> off and rebooted. >>> >>> Does the machine have a "soft power button" and it is configured >>> to issue a "shutdown -p now" (which is quite common)? When you >>> have access to the machine, try that. Even if the machine does >>> not accept network logins, this mechanism might still work. >> >> Hmmm. It has a "soft" power button; have to hold it down 5 sec >> or so to power off. > > That's the "override time" for a "hard power off". If you only > press it once, it should issue "shutdown -p now", but of course > this only works if the system is still responding. Even if the > keyboard input and screen output, as well as networking services > stopped to work, this _might_ still be effective. >> Those things can be configured to issue a command that will actually >> get executed without a login? > > Sure, it has been working for many years. Check the BIOS setup, > some machines can be configured to what the button does. The > default setup of FreeBSD should perform the correct action via > ACPI. > > In the past, it also worked with APM. In that case, /etc/apmd.conf > would contain the command executed when the button was pressed. > On APM-capable machines, the PSU would be switched off, just like > today's ACPI-based systems. Of course that only works with ATX > power supplies, the AT ones usually had a mechanical switch. Ah, I see. The driver raises a signal the system can respond to. >> I assume you're talking about a bios option? How does that work? > > I've seen BIOS setups allowing different actions for the button, > from "go to sleep" to "soft power off" or "hard power off". That > action (hard power off) is taken when pressing the button for > about 5 seconds. The OS can NOT deal with that case. > >> sounds like magic of some sort... Or is this a whole login >> sequence with the shutdown at the end? > > No, it's a system action using ACPI. No magic involved. :-) I'll look at it next time I reboot. Reading the bios manual, it looks like acpi 2.0 support is disabled by default, which may be where it is; otherwise I don't see anything obvious. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 04:23:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9F8106564A for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 04:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4278FC0A for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 04:23:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-32-97.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.32.97]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210DF2764C; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 06:23:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7I4NFDE003875; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 06:23:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 06:23:15 +0200 From: Polytropon To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Message-Id: <20120818062315.eccc7d1d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <502F16B7.8050902@dreamchaser.org> References: <502EA73B.6000008@dreamchaser.org> <20120818030537.4d5bf55b.freebsd@edvax.de> <502F017A.7030001@dreamchaser.org> <20120818051716.40ccf88c.freebsd@edvax.de> <502F16B7.8050902@dreamchaser.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: fsck recoveries, configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 04:23:19 -0000 On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 22:14:47 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote: > On 08/17/12 21:17, Polytropon wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:44:10 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote: > >> On 08/17/12 19:05, Polytropon wrote: > >>>> 2. When my machine hung (could not rlogin or ping), I powered > >>>> off and rebooted. > >>> > >>> Does the machine have a "soft power button" and it is configured > >>> to issue a "shutdown -p now" (which is quite common)? When you > >>> have access to the machine, try that. Even if the machine does > >>> not accept network logins, this mechanism might still work. > >> > >> Hmmm. It has a "soft" power button; have to hold it down 5 sec > >> or so to power off. > > > > That's the "override time" for a "hard power off". If you only > > press it once, it should issue "shutdown -p now", but of course > > this only works if the system is still responding. Even if the > > keyboard input and screen output, as well as networking services > > stopped to work, this _might_ still be effective. > > >> Those things can be configured to issue a command that will actually > >> get executed without a login? > > > > Sure, it has been working for many years. Check the BIOS setup, > > some machines can be configured to what the button does. The > > default setup of FreeBSD should perform the correct action via > > ACPI. > > > > In the past, it also worked with APM. In that case, /etc/apmd.conf > > would contain the command executed when the button was pressed. > > On APM-capable machines, the PSU would be switched off, just like > > today's ACPI-based systems. Of course that only works with ATX > > power supplies, the AT ones usually had a mechanical switch. > > Ah, I see. The driver raises a signal the system can respond to. Yes, it's typically done in the kernel (or by a kernel module). > >> I assume you're talking about a bios option? How does that work? > > > > I've seen BIOS setups allowing different actions for the button, > > from "go to sleep" to "soft power off" or "hard power off". That > > action (hard power off) is taken when pressing the button for > > about 5 seconds. The OS can NOT deal with that case. > > > >> sounds like magic of some sort... Or is this a whole login > >> sequence with the shutdown at the end? > > > > No, it's a system action using ACPI. No magic involved. :-) > > I'll look at it next time I reboot. Reading the bios manual, it > looks like acpi 2.0 support is disabled by default, which may be > where it is; otherwise I don't see anything obvious. Thanks. Also check the BIOS setup. In most cases, the default configuration will assign the button press to a "soft power down", raising the proper signal via ACPI. You can also check dmesg's output: acpi_button0: on acpi0 acpi_button1: on acpi1 I don't know where this 2nd button is on my system, it only has one which - when being pressed - lets the system shut down and then power off properly. You can find even more elaborate data in sysctl's output: hw.acpi.power_button_state: S5 hw.acpi.sleep_button_state: S3 dev.acpi_button.0.%desc: Power Button dev.acpi_button.0.%driver: acpi_button dev.acpi_button.0.%location: handle=\_SB_.PWRB dev.acpi_button.0.%pnpinfo: _HID=PNP0C0C _UID=0 dev.acpi_button.0.%parent: acpi0 dev.acpi_button.1.%desc: Sleep Button dev.acpi_button.1.%driver: acpi_button dev.acpi_button.1.%location: handle=\_SB_.SLPB dev.acpi_button.1.%pnpinfo: _HID=PNP0C0E _UID=0 dev.acpi_button.1.%parent: acpi0 dev.acpi_button.1.wake: 1 As I said, my system doesn't have that 2nd "sleep" button anywhere, but addressing the power button is correct, the S3 state explained as "Commonly referred to as Standby, Sleep, or Suspend to RAM. RAM remains powered" is then used as a signal to perform the system shutdown as intended. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 05:54:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E312106566B for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 05:54:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCC68FC17 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 05:54:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q7I5ruHo004973; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:53:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <502F2DF3.6040104@dreamchaser.org> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:53:55 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <502EA73B.6000008@dreamchaser.org> <20120818030537.4d5bf55b.freebsd@edvax.de> <502F017A.7030001@dreamchaser.org> <20120818051716.40ccf88c.freebsd@edvax.de> <502F16B7.8050902@dreamchaser.org> <20120818062315.eccc7d1d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120818062315.eccc7d1d.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:53:56 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: fsck recoveries, configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 05:54:03 -0000 On 08/17/12 22:23, Polytropon wrote: > Also check the BIOS setup. In most cases, the default configuration > will assign the button press to a "soft power down", raising the > proper signal via ACPI. You can also check dmesg's output: > > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > acpi_button1: on acpi1 > > I don't know where this 2nd button is on my system, it only has > one which - when being pressed - lets the system shut down and > then power off properly. > > You can find even more elaborate data in sysctl's output: > > hw.acpi.power_button_state: S5 > hw.acpi.sleep_button_state: S3 > dev.acpi_button.0.%desc: Power Button > dev.acpi_button.0.%driver: acpi_button > dev.acpi_button.0.%location: handle=\_SB_.PWRB > dev.acpi_button.0.%pnpinfo: _HID=PNP0C0C _UID=0 > dev.acpi_button.0.%parent: acpi0 > dev.acpi_button.1.%desc: Sleep Button > dev.acpi_button.1.%driver: acpi_button > dev.acpi_button.1.%location: handle=\_SB_.SLPB > dev.acpi_button.1.%pnpinfo: _HID=PNP0C0E _UID=0 > dev.acpi_button.1.%parent: acpi0 > dev.acpi_button.1.wake: 1 > > As I said, my system doesn't have that 2nd "sleep" button anywhere, > but addressing the power button is correct, the S3 state explained > as "Commonly referred to as Standby, Sleep, or Suspend to RAM. RAM > remains powered" is then used as a signal to perform the system > shutdown as intended. Hmmm: acpi0: <030811 XSDT1017> on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi0: reservation of fec00000, 1000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of fee00000, 1000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of ffb80000, 80000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of fec10000, 20 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of fed80000, 1000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of 100000, c7e00000 (3) failed acpi_timer0: <32-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 cpu2: on acpi0 cpu3: on acpi0 acpi_ec0: port 0x62,0x66 on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 attimer0: port 0x40-0x43 irq 0 on acpi0 atrtc0: port 0x70-0x71 irq 8 on acpi0 uart0: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 hpet0: iomem 0xfed00000-0xfed003ff on acpi0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 Do all those reservation failed indicate the interrupt is not going to actually be seen? What does (fixed) mean? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 06:09:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C20106566B for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 06:09:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BE98FC0A for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 06:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-32-97.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.32.97]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16343CE22; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 08:09:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7I69Gm3004251; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 08:09:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 08:09:16 +0200 From: Polytropon To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Message-Id: <20120818080916.bdefcdbc.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <502F2DF3.6040104@dreamchaser.org> References: <502EA73B.6000008@dreamchaser.org> <20120818030537.4d5bf55b.freebsd@edvax.de> <502F017A.7030001@dreamchaser.org> <20120818051716.40ccf88c.freebsd@edvax.de> <502F16B7.8050902@dreamchaser.org> <20120818062315.eccc7d1d.freebsd@edvax.de> <502F2DF3.6040104@dreamchaser.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: fsck recoveries, configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 06:09:19 -0000 On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:53:55 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote: > Hmmm: > > acpi0: <030811 XSDT1017> on motherboard > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > acpi0: reservation of fec00000, 1000 (3) failed > acpi0: reservation of fee00000, 1000 (3) failed > acpi0: reservation of ffb80000, 80000 (3) failed > acpi0: reservation of fec10000, 20 (3) failed > acpi0: reservation of fed80000, 1000 (3) failed > acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed > acpi0: reservation of 100000, c7e00000 (3) failed > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > Do all those reservation failed indicate the interrupt is not > going to actually be seen? Seems to be messages related to an improperly implemented ACPI BIOS I'd assume. Look: acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of 100000, 7fde0000 (3) failed I also have two of such messages here. In my case, it's a really cheap home PC (from a discounter). > What does (fixed) mean? A can only guess: It probably means that the button is fixed (mounted) in the machine, e. g. at the front panel. You could also check in sysctl's output on what state the button will initiate when pressed (usually S3). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 07:42:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619E2106564A; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 07:42:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010028FC08; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 07:42:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1T2dft-00063i-6N>; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 09:42:25 +0200 Received: from e178003055.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.3.55] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1T2dfs-0000Ph-W4>; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 09:42:25 +0200 Message-ID: <502F475A.4060207@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 09:42:18 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120810 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garrett Cooper References: <502D12C0.2060405@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9222267582D0970103638D21" X-Originating-IP: 85.178.3.55 Cc: FreeBSD Current , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 07:42:32 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9222267582D0970103638D21 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 08/16/12 21:44, schrieb Garrett Cooper: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Hartmann, O. > wrote: >> >> I ran into a very delicate and nasty situation. >=20 > ... >=20 >> On both FBSD 10 boxes, the installation of the port security/cyrus-sas= l2 >> got corrupted by "install" and/or "mtree" dumping core and signalling >> SIGNAL 11. Booting into multiuser mode is impossible, login core dumps= >> SIGNAL 11, many other daemons, too. The only way is to boot into singl= e >> user mode. >=20 > I'm not drawing a correlation between this and unrelated coredumping pr= ocesses. Me neither, I report this for completeness, since I'm not a OS developer, such a behaviour could hint/indicate people who are involved in the OS development, what is going on. Sorry when I'm trying to be too precise (precise as precise I can be without the exact terminology!). >=20 >> An installation failed due to pkg(ng) was missing libarchive.so via >> portmaster or via core dumping install(1). By installing on one box, m= y >> home box, port security/cyrus-sasl2 manually, luckily install(1) and >> mtree(1) didn't coredump and it worked - and this precedure rescued me= =2E >> But on my lab's development box, it doesn't work! >=20 > Don't make delete-old-lib unless you have it moved off to compat > directories, or have rebuilt everything using the new libarchive. I didn't! As I wrote before, this mess happened on ALL(!) freeBSD 10.0-CURRENT boxes in the very same way when I updated/reinstalled security/cyrus-sasl2. Moreover: I can reproduce this on all boxes. All my boxes use OpenLDAP as a backend with SASL2 enabled (not used so far). >=20 >> On this specific box, where this nasty problem also occured the same w= ay >> by simply recompiling everything for port www/apache22, including the >> reinstallation of port security/cyrus-sasl2. Nearly every binary is >> suddenly coredumping (as on the home box). login, vi, install, devfs, >> syslogd, mtree, id, find ... a whole lot of binaries seem to be >> compromised by something I do not see (libsasl2.so perhaps?). >=20 > truss the binaries to figure out exactly what's going wrong. I will try, but when this errative coredumps of binaries occur, nothing works properly that is using any kinf of dynamical loaded library! Only the binaries (static?) from /resucue/* do their work. >=20 > A lot of this lost effort could be avoided (like others have posted on > the list more than once), by having a centralized package distribution > server, and by having VMs or jails and keeping snapshots with > pre-upgrade state on the package building machine to avoid "dead in > the water scenarios" like you're in right now. Yes, I'm working on this. it seems, that it becomes more relevant since I realized that FreeBSD suffers sometimes from misleaded ports or ports which suddenly are marked BROKEN and do not get compiled ... >=20 >> I tried to help myself via copying /rescue/vi to /usr/bin/vi to have a= t >> least a working vi. But in /rescue, I can not find install or mtree. I= 'm >> not familiar with the sophisticated ways of /rescue. Where are >> install(1) and mtree(1)? >=20 > I ran into this issue too a little while ago. I basically gave up on > recovering a VM and nuked and repaved it using a LiveCD with a chroot, > some cp -p'ing, etc. But yes.. it would be nice if I could have > recovered the system at least with a static toolchain: cc, binutils > [equivalent], mtree, install, etc. This is how I recovered the nasty broken box. The other one was easy to recover by reinstalling security/cyrus-sasl2. I'm quite sure that there is something very foul with something in LDAP or SASL2, since I can reproduce that proplem. I saw that rtdl-elf has got some quirks these days, I will try to go behind the date/version of the source tree when it was committed and check whether this is the problem. >=20 > ... >=20 >> Disabling this pkgng tag leads to reinstallation of missing packages, >> which are store in the pkgng sqlite format and not as ASCII anymore, b= ut >> then I get >> /var/runld-elf.so.hints: No such file or directory >> Error: shared library "iconv.3" does not exist. >=20 > service ldconfig start ? Yes ... sorry ... in the heat of the fight I forgot ... but it doesn't make the problem go away. >=20 >> But most of the libs have never been touch! So what is the loader >> complaining about? >=20 > ... >=20 >> I tried to find rescue images and a rescue DVD of a snap shot server, >> but there is no way to crawl through the informations on the web pages= >> towards a snapshot. All folders end up in 2011 and highly outdated >> (www.freebsd.org, I didn't look at mirrors since I thought the main >> server carries the most recent stuff). This isn't funny. No lead, no >> hint, even in the download section. >> >> If someone has some hints how to recompile the sources with an emergen= cy >> booted disk, I highly appreciate some desater advice. Maybe the releas= e >> of FreeBSD-10-CURRENT sources I compiled do have accidentally a nasty >> bug, so it would be nice to update the sources and have a complete >> recompilation done. >> >> Thanks in advance, >=20 > Simply put: fix your infrastructure (as this isn't the first time > you have complained about infrastructure issues on the MLs). A lot of > these issues should not be issues if you set up your infrastructure > properly to deal with building things only once, backup packages > before installation, you had snapshots of your system, etc. This will > help you avoid administration pain, and hopefully will result in less > duplicated work. >=20 > Cheers, > -Garrett I know :-( Oliver --------------enig9222267582D0970103638D21 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQL0dgAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8/NsIANT8PdNhIHZVzR3/qgmTIHJ9 zzrrJw8vd7Uh2qVndnLMIxlYtBqVHwDdqa1zqgEvFWMaYrZyfJPgppG5cbKdP3k2 +jHzPIir/rWCRmfAiAixo40C88c1lH9TAC638Gwu3YaVt8tHDHJgXGi5gnn9Jr7r HcheoiNhoKmQSAP2a3xKwjquxtLMuoY4qnt8ghci68AmHO5M07XuNZVkekmYU39H eCmfvsHgsMk4X2s3v228EieVD5daGOMCtAe1QHaOKOJFgoVKzFlO7HvL9DtL2cVf cxCAZIuBmSejb2IO990vhnCiEQqP0dQ9hledMDk9rnRIKz9vtBQculaQ54ZCRPg= =oV+W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9222267582D0970103638D21-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 10:16:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A25106564A for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 10:16:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDD68FC08 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 10:16:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl7 with SMTP id l7so5558205yen.13 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:16:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1R9D8NBsD5qkVLdYMvJAbAQzhHY/D8y/Iiu2ukhD4hs=; b=WxIt3Xm+ae+ty0HY8IXpDj1sBtn/A3j/bhoYBbPDhLaDNr8eziXW5QMy1+qp+McPwz 4to1ezVYG6rewm0tiRFjSW1lAegevZMnWPkDodcreCbmOC90UcKmJI96l3ATQWWdW5dL CiMq7Lce+ng2tf+ZSdPqBlsEQLRqx9uXDATto= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=1R9D8NBsD5qkVLdYMvJAbAQzhHY/D8y/Iiu2ukhD4hs=; b=KWZWVB6I9W0iDtHll6YWjecJt4rCqp1T/iuWwCzWR8AlcSD2RQQULIQ2GrOsnL1zbC mI4wh8MMBlBrJ/uqPD3uh5AcQVweOs7EZcrf2umAptxQGulv70u498qNKs2jEWobKa8D TKdDgsEsf/f/3oZFynqzugjgI1EVNPxitt7DIrgbfF/BFbhg37owACHMk0o6ILiy7BOx xV64YaksHAmw0/il1SyghpE7OW/pgl0ohFcm+L75o5hwRzvFLdrPWmbQGhJJjoY3JYPb 0C++0BXBbFUabkNJ5e6gaKOM+OPkiExyD2sZ6jbyDylyaO5DLZGDhvCghWLuZ6AvjCON 1iuw== Received: by 10.101.84.13 with SMTP id m13mr3842141anl.4.1345284995208; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:16:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k2sm9145120anl.11.2012.08.18.03.16.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3WzcdC6wxfz2CG68 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 06:16:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 06:16:31 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120818061631.2f7eecc2@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120818034358.dd0562d1.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <1345195062.601.29947.38439@saddam3.rambler.ru> <20120818034358.dd0562d1.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmHc6dOVJoucrJBgiksNHZF3wcuMRq1QBEvuhe6c2OZMedkTd/oUWWLku2/LO36f536WXsz Subject: Re: doc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 10:16:37 -0000 On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:43:58 +0200 Polytropon articulated: > On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:17:42 +0400, иван кузнецов wrote: > > how to open RU_FREEBSD_DOC_20111014.TBZ under windows? > > The file is a tar archive compressed with BZip2. It's no real > surprise that "Windows" cannot natively handle it, as with many > established standard formats. :-) > > > several program cant,i was attempt.7zip cant. > > It's not a 7zip archive; still the 7zip page on http://7-zip.org/ > mentions that the BZip2 format is supported. > > However, there's BZip2 available for "Windows", maybe this > can help you: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/bzip2.htm > > There are also claims that "WinRAR" is able to extract BZip2 > files. WinZIP® is perfectly capable of handling the following file types: Zip (.zip) Zipx (.zipx) RAR (.rar) 7Z (.7z) BZ2 (.bz, .bz2, .tbz, .tbz2) LHA/LZH (.lha, .lzh) Cabinet (.cab) Disc Image (.img, .iso) TAR (.tar) GZIP (.gz, .taz, .tgz) Compress (.tz, .z) UUencode (.uu, .uue) XXencode (.xxe) MIME (.b64, .mim) BinHex (.bhx, .hqx) Most other compressed files I was personally responsible for having the "7Z" format added several years ago. By the way Poly, FreeBSD does not handle all types of compressed files natively any more than Windows does. There are also add-ons available to handle some really obscure formats. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 04:44:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C34106564A for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 04:44:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leearic@126.com) Received: from m15-232.126.com (m15-232.126.com [220.181.15.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4158FC12 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 04:44:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=126.com; s=s110527; h=Received:Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject: MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=3FJaxb9GJtQBosJt4BLI+tI5+7jwA61nwk lCiGHKVCI=; b=IWpOXpfaS789omggjceUbBzD8SA6MbKUF5eyLTdSXBe8CQFm40 ge8bAFatzyTNiqeD8AclgrsW9RWv6ycRT+LR+vjlxAOciqfk/SYXmkLNtWoRfAyP tqbuqYYbaUNCNZn9zcuYIJjeEUNdShWnmRH52Nu4LPGbiPTHoJ4fR/L+8= Received: from leearic ( [171.216.28.118] ) by ajax-webmail-sdy5 (Coremail) ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:44:22 +0800 (GMT+08:00) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:44:07 +0800 From: "Aric" To: "freebsd-questions" Message-ID: <22695d08.1b82.139380bd3e0.Coremail.leearic@126.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NetEase Flash Mail 2.2.1.16 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Originating-IP: [171.216.28.118] X-CM-TRANSID: 3sqowGAZwUKnHS9QnqgEAA--.2863W X-CM-SenderInfo: pohht2llf6ij2wof0z/1tbiGAAP0Ul1uPIVawAAsO X-Coremail-Antispam: 1U5529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7vcSsGvfC2KfnxnUU== X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 10:48:39 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: about system api X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 04:44:30 -0000 SGksYWxsDQoNCmNvdWxkIGFueWJvZHkga25vd3MgaG93IHRvIGdldCB0aGUgRnJlZUJTRCBzeXN0 ZW0gQVBJcyANCg0KDQoyMDEyLTA4LTE4DQoNCg0KDQpBcmlj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 10:54:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64F8106564A for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 10:54:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795EC8FC0C for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 10:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so8958567obb.13 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:54:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=qzHDXwfNUJ7ta1aWS6nwFOo/LeZ+Lq3KxP/yuVL+NN0=; b=Gd+b0Y/Q/KJUBBnC63jVjYwEUxaQVS0ZMojOjNg2Swt4aD2ooX67Hp2awARuUMzN9Q REilEC+TTWfYKfuym91t/FeD5GbY6maAPYcFDugKA8IqUjjLSjvJB4/C4xIHHEjsmpU1 N/FmrDPO/nQswSoXXTFwXzz4LbLdR6qbNJkasmJ8yYeBGTl3wcMe5zgR9cCP7YT+XFnS A/fFDRzJie8F7Xmx0X3Y7YR2Qizt0ZG550cCGICP2pSCnHcVXl34BtK/F/9pYj4/34us fMvCoDulgAbaYk92uT6xVO3DJq8GMw1SwUH5IqCfqyCM4i2BSGg8/tBR64G1dIhFjVwJ 8Ucw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.51.65 with SMTP id i1mr6065613obo.45.1345287274453; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:54:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.192.106 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:54:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [93.221.177.41] In-Reply-To: <22695d08.1b82.139380bd3e0.Coremail.leearic@126.com> References: <22695d08.1b82.139380bd3e0.Coremail.leearic@126.com> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:54:34 +0200 Message-ID: From: "C. P. Ghost" To: Aric Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkWBlcLxnNwqhrAIc5I6l3Z03oIXQPHMI+SOtOP2sS3LYvV19gnflCWNbGt3csZlsiGy4/I Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: about system api X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 10:54:35 -0000 On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Aric wrote: > Hi,all > > could anybody knows how to get the FreeBSD system APIs What do you mean with "system API"? Maybe the interfaces to the kernel, as defined in /usr/include/sys? > 2012-08-18 > > Aric -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 11:10:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BC9106566C for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45FE48FC0A for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0EEE6421; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:12:29 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=gYOSE0Z3qYM8 K03O+FPOCavKH8k=; b=cjSjaJyRR+MnYxWbhk7y4+vd/+n5b80oQazfJ9jKvYJu oAdrU951SK6yNTW4JxEqWPJjpMuSz/+G+Qk2tHOQPsMA9jPv0Q6FEYZQc7XiQERl rUXqDzhINQwMpoGMF6ht1Q78gcLh6alhNheJ3KanlwKKZhb0hdZgmijVPigu2eo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=WZVKzi mHCGMFk1VrnG4viW1AFYsZrkD7f92bzvywzkzH58y9e1KtNm+SedEhPSnaQ9wAFE Ka5lGjCz1CczgwQw3RL6JpUoEE2eOJMMFyv0Ui8GP6b60j0MKoi7BQQbouqhH9/Z 9pnuptMB8M3XwpuAiy6K8yyCBiFvBL0UnRR8c= Received: from [192.168.2.11] (unknown [93.89.81.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A803BE63E9; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:12:29 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <502F7811.3030508@cran.org.uk> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:10:09 +0100 From: Bruce Cran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?0LjQstCw0L0g0LrRg9C30L3QtdGG0L7Qsg==?= References: <1345195062.601.29947.38439@saddam3.rambler.ru> In-Reply-To: <1345195062.601.29947.38439@saddam3.rambler.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: doc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:10:13 -0000 On 17/08/2012 10:17, =D0=B8=D0=B2=D0=B0=D0=BD =D0=BA=D1=83=D0=B7=D0=BD=D0= =B5=D1=86=D0=BE=D0=B2 wrote: > how to open RU_FREEBSD_DOC_20111014.TBZ under windows? several program=20 > cant,i was attempt.7zip cant. why i not able read documentation BEFORE=20 > install? where it after install? second,you installer is not well, not=20 > very undersandingable for newbis.i mean user must hit tab in some=20 > dialogs,but he press enter - attempt please.it is not MISTAKE but look=20 > mysteriously,and user worry.you shoud do only one small step in order=20 > to do freebsd more frendly - publish full international docs on=20 > install dvd -- user only put dvd and see docs in browser.its simpler=20 > than rewriting os in order to div it more frendly.is it true flash=20 > work badly or after complex work? i cant write on my writemaster dvd=20 > drive with freebsd9 - brasero dont see drive.what you can say about=20 > it? with best regards,ivan,Russia,Moscow. You should be able to open it using 7-zip, but you'll need 2 steps - the=20 first time you run extract you'll get a tar file. Then run extract on=20 *that* file to get the documentation. --=20 Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 11:11:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB991065678 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:11:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF138FC15 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:11:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-32-97.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.32.97]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A012C2783C; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:11:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7IBB5bO001947; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:11:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:11:05 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "Aric" Message-Id: <20120818131105.2e38ce44.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <22695d08.1b82.139380bd3e0.Coremail.leearic@126.com> References: <22695d08.1b82.139380bd3e0.Coremail.leearic@126.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: about system api X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:11:07 -0000 On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:44:07 +0800, Aric wrote: > Hi,all > > could anybody knows how to get the FreeBSD system APIs For documentation about the kernel interfaces and the library calls, refer to the respective manpages. For the full source code of the entire system, check the content of the /usr/src directory. Whatever you want to understand as "system APIs" will be in there. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 11:16:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F252E106566B for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:16:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09518FC1D for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-32-97.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.32.97]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9535F27A6F for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:16:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7IBGSBi001964 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:16:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:16:28 +0200 From: Polytropon To: FreeBSD Message-Id: <20120818131628.1b8c2956.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120818061631.2f7eecc2@scorpio> References: <1345195062.601.29947.38439@saddam3.rambler.ru> <20120818034358.dd0562d1.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120818061631.2f7eecc2@scorpio> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: doc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:16:30 -0000 On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 06:16:31 -0400, Jerry wrote: > On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:43:58 +0200 > Polytropon articulated: > > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:17:42 +0400, иван кузнецов wrote: > > > how to open RU_FREEBSD_DOC_20111014.TBZ under windows? > > > > The file is a tar archive compressed with BZip2. It's no real > > surprise that "Windows" cannot natively handle it, as with many > > established standard formats. :-) > > > > > several program cant,i was attempt.7zip cant. > > > > It's not a 7zip archive; still the 7zip page on http://7-zip.org/ > > mentions that the BZip2 format is supported. > > > > However, there's BZip2 available for "Windows", maybe this > > can help you: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/bzip2.htm > > > > There are also claims that "WinRAR" is able to extract BZip2 > > files. > > WinZIP® is perfectly capable of > handling the following file types: > > Zip (.zip) > Zipx (.zipx) > RAR (.rar) > 7Z (.7z) > BZ2 (.bz, .bz2, .tbz, .tbz2) > LHA/LZH (.lha, .lzh) > Cabinet (.cab) > Disc Image (.img, .iso) > TAR (.tar) > GZIP (.gz, .taz, .tgz) > Compress (.tz, .z) > UUencode (.uu, .uue) > XXencode (.xxe) > MIME (.b64, .mim) > BinHex (.bhx, .hqx) > Most other compressed files > > I was personally responsible for having the "7Z" format added several > years ago. I thought that the OP would have used "WinZIP" as the typical first candidate, given the fact that .tbz means "tar bzip2" archiving and compression. So that program should havve been fine. > By the way Poly, FreeBSD does not handle all types of compressed files > natively any more than Windows does. There are also add-ons available > to handle some really obscure formats. It can handle everything that tar, cpio, pax, compress and (of course bzip2 (belongs to the OS!) and all other native tools utilizing libarchive addresses. I'm quite confident that this is a better "out of the box support" than what "Windows" has to offer because handling archives usually involves manually downloading and installing 3rd party programs, like "WinZIP" or "WinRAR". Of course I do not claim "all types", e. g. for RAR archives you also need to have the system install the proper program, but who uses RAR anyway (except the packagers of warez)... :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 11:47:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFB4106566C for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:47:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8608FC0C for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:47:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96BFE6421; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:49:39 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=PUxDb4cmHpGs RklaUePq4ThBFhE=; b=U+OWgPzhJLRRjzhu3/gYWcoqYrfKsZJxZF4X4pIj8y8h VOgm417vLvl/mKlGpV3ZxpNLmZtmREYXoIbdPqbyZBJeUy37Y+0UaabcdDE8Mc9d LyiThxu7+waRKByXenE9L9iioKAjOTD6RofGLEm6KI2rsAQo2e1wWoSQ/chrLMs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=WY/lr2 mO4QSxYbqa4L9qE9S3wXe7yYrW/HkzcwGgPCzA618k+jmtaFHcn6Cg8WGmVe820c nHBmp6iKrLNfaN/YBlNqaEUdTidk5C101PWTN9cXAl9iNmC2b1EDKuHzMmgtiAjc Uz1ATX/l+SStPvj+gJumI7M7fP+5eoX2nrem0= Received: from [192.168.2.11] (unknown [93.89.81.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B13D0E63E9; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:49:39 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <502F80C7.3010007@cran.org.uk> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:47:19 +0100 From: Bruce Cran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <502EA73B.6000008@dreamchaser.org> <20120818030537.4d5bf55b.freebsd@edvax.de> <502F017A.7030001@dreamchaser.org> <20120818051716.40ccf88c.freebsd@edvax.de> <502F16B7.8050902@dreamchaser.org> <20120818062315.eccc7d1d.freebsd@edvax.de> <502F2DF3.6040104@dreamchaser.org> <20120818080916.bdefcdbc.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120818080916.bdefcdbc.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd@dreamchaser.org, FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: fsck recoveries, configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:47:23 -0000 On 18/08/2012 07:09, Polytropon wrote: > A can only guess: It probably means that the button is fixed > (mounted) in the machine, e. g. at the front panel. >From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Configuration_and_Power_Interface : "ACPI-compliant systems interact with hardware through either a "Function Fixed Hardware (FFH) Interface", or a platform-independent hardware programming model which relies on platform-specific ACPI Machine Language (AML) provided by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM). Function Fixed Hardware interfaces are platform-specific features, provided by platform manufacturers for the purposes of performance and failure recovery. Standard Intel-based PCs have a fixed function interface defined by Intel,[10] which provides a set of core functionality that reduces an ACPI-compliant system's need for full driver stacks for providing basic functionality during boot time or in the case of major system failure." -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 23:25:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE3D106566C for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 23:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926178FC08 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 23:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ialo14 with SMTP id o14so1906943ial.13 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 16:25:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=zRAzzKSXgOJexrEtgcP95aaHz3f8Egcffrk5qY3Dyrg=; b=QEVI8p1CIQHqEbp921caccnejanSEfLVb8SLIAs65PNI+bzE9qLVpyrnzfBw2vOPzs /xgBbrBCwoWTCvpHgXlpvB1y7kBLnny/LHqydgbNw4cHFtV76JI5CIzJfn2rm14w/Fn/ Wvj27w/eTs/8b+yJu9TZddziWQZh2pLsvg3u2UiJSoxkfXvelkJN2GTL9OiqlVG+leiy n/Ks/XazNxvmLrVyB5wj9zNvA3OTpio7KbWYY7wtdLbF1w/H3fUqDAoMQfgpxCYutn8B l67/qAA3eMgyrLznWJKgYj8/gcVu5H67PKwpn+jnezc54F++usCaR8w+XAoJN/L72zm9 C6Zw== Received: by 10.50.192.199 with SMTP id hi7mr5869186igc.68.1345332342780; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 16:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from luna.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com. [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a10sm17092581igd.1.2012.08.18.16.25.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 18 Aug 2012 16:25:42 -0700 (PDT) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 18:25:33 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-RELEASE-p3; KDE/4.8.4; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201208181825.33758.lumiwa@gmail.com> Subject: libxul X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 23:25:43 -0000 Hi! There are vulnerabilities in libxul-1.9.2 very long time and looks like nothing is better. Are there a new libxul version somewhere to download, please? portaudit -Fda auditfile.tbz 100% of 79 kB 316 kBps New database installed. Database created: Sat Aug 18 18:15:04 CDT 2012 Affected package: libxul-1.9.2.28_1 Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/dbf338d0-dce5-11e1- b655-14dae9ebcf89.html Affected package: libxul-1.9.2.28_1 Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/bfecf7c1- af47-11e1-9580-4061862b8c22.html Affected package: libxul-1.9.2.28_1 Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/380e8c56-8e32-11e1-9580-4061862b8c22.html 3 problem(s) in your installed packages found. You are advised to update or deinstall the affected package(s) immediately. Mitja -------- http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa