From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 1 00:18:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B7C106566B; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 00:18:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mozolevsky@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BE58FC0C; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 00:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghbg20 with SMTP id g20so1931934ghb.13 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:18:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=CkHh0yk5dPdMdasQGNkTCnD2emHeBGpPEx/6oKIYCxw=; b=m814zPamDLRG81GUYECaPilPbxf5CE9EPKwHEK1KpusZGV/ehirEP7Rs+1dhlP8Bh7 h4QZKmlDoQwkP/JPx76tR5pznTjwjCX/txQzoGbUJG4GEwGDqyPbqhTVE5JooCkGiLIO q2ZC7iHuZO+u3jD27aW3KBiSY0dJ4f+OVvaz8= Received: by 10.68.29.137 with SMTP id k9mr196046pbh.109.1322698697065; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:18:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.48.5 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:17:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111201001158.GA48051@freebsd.org> References: <20111130224422.GA36424@freebsd.org> <20111201000243.GB44877@freebsd.org> <20111201001158.GA48051@freebsd.org> From: Igor Mozolevsky Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 00:17:36 +0000 Message-ID: To: Alexander Best Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: comparing floating points via "==" or "!=" X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:18:18 -0000 On 1 December 2011 00:11, Alexander Best wrote: > i sorry. since sys/dev/ath/ath_rate/sample/tx_schedules.h also handles a lot > of integer values, i thought you referred to abs(3), because you saw also > some issues with the integer computations in that file. so i thought you were > referring to yet another issue in that file. Oh, I see! No, I was referring to a generic |a-b| expression, not abs(3) specifically. Retrospectively, using |a-b| would've been better :-) Cheers, -- Igor