From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 26 21:31:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D8A16A41F for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:31:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org) Received: from yearning.mcc.ac.uk (yearning.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.203.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DB143D4C for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:31:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by yearning.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1EK0Z7-0003Fj-QW for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 22:31:13 +0100 Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j8QLV92v083158 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 22:31:13 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.13.1/8.12.6/Submit) id j8QLV9np083157 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 22:31:09 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 22:31:09 +0100 From: Jonathon McKitrick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050926213108.GA83097@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: Register usage for pointer access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:31:18 -0000 Other than the fact that scanning, moving, and so on use esi as the source register and edi as the destination, is there are other reason to use one over the other for general pointer use? jm --