From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 20 05:18:45 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E181106566C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 05:18:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679618FC0C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 05:18:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5K5Ihxk071183;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 07:18:43 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q5K5Ih6m071180; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 07:18:43 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 07:18:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+tpaK2ONz2wD7Zb4Hi9W6kk7RR8_VZR8YJTj9jAEj_b4_sDaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200716330.71176@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191952250.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<854D02B1-CA89-4F5E-8773-DB05F2868D74@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200618290.46371@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CA+tpaK2ONz2wD7Zb4Hi9W6kk7RR8_VZR8YJTj9jAEj_b4_sDaQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED;
	BOUNDARY="2456600518-732062402-1340169523=:71176"
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 07:18:44 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 05:18:45 -0000

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--2456600518-732062402-1340169523=:71176
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT

> Yes, Clang in general produces slower binaries than gcc.  Is that in dispute or something?  Or is this just repetition in case we
> didn't hear you the first time?

just yesterday i've heard lots of otherwise claim.

> 
> Try thinking of the transition as a step back to take many steps forward.

What exactly step forward it means?
For now i see ONLY politics and aggression after pointing out facts.

This doesn't look like serious behaviour of serious people.

>  Or just change your compiler.
Will i be able to compile FreeBSD base system with gcc after some time?
not sure.

--2456600518-732062402-1340169523=:71176--