Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 05:18:41 +0000 (GMT) From: Adam David <adam@veda.is> To: burton@bsampley.vip.best.com (Burton Sampley) Cc: guido@gvr.win.tue.nl, chuckr@glue.umd.edu, danny@panda.hilink.com.au, ache@nagual.ru, guido@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-usrbin@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/su su.1 su.c Message-ID: <199702260518.FAA07685@veda.is> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970225152537.202A-100000@bsampley.vip.best.com> from Burton Sampley at "Feb 25, 97 03:33:33 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I have to take a minute to through in my 2 cents here. After working in > the EDP Audit Department for a major bank in the US, the thought of a co. > not knowing who has access to root privs is a little frightening. What's > the co.'s reasoning for this kind of setup? I would hope it's *NOT* a > mission critical, production box. The thought of such a company not knowing who its users are is indeed terrible, far worse than even a root-only box (assuming non-privileged clients) unless the admins are really stupid. -- Adam David <adam@veda.is>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702260518.FAA07685>