From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar  1 06:28:14 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A7516A4CE
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon,  1 Mar 2004 06:28:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.tele-kom.ru (mx.tele-kom.ru [213.80.148.6])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A6F143D1D
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon,  1 Mar 2004 06:28:13 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from doublef@tele-kom.ru)
Received: (qmail 57087 invoked by uid 555); 1 Mar 2004 17:28:08 +0300
Received: from hal.localdomain (213.80.149.138)
	by t-k.ru with TeleMail/2 id 1078151288-57069
	for zhangweiwu@realss.com; Mon, Mar  1 17:28:08 2004 +0300 (MSK)
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 17:25:38 +0300
From: Sergey 'DoubleF' Zaharchenko <doublef@tele-kom.ru>
To: zhangweiwu@realss.com
Message-Id: <20040301172538.56294112@Hal.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <Law11-F26DplxgM2x1T000162a5@hotmail.com>
References: <Law11-F26DplxgM2x1T000162a5@hotmail.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.9claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.8)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 micalg="pgp-sha1";
 boundary="Signature=_Mon__1_Mar_2004_17_25_38_+0300_oVW3dSlo3=PRU1Zf"
cc: weiwuzhang@hotmail.com
cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: scheduling priority not working?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 14:28:14 -0000

--Signature=_Mon__1_Mar_2004_17_25_38_+0300_oVW3dSlo3=PRU1Zf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 19:07:12 +0800
"Zhang Weiwu" <weiwuzhang@hotmail.com> probably wrote:

> nice(1) is just what I learned from school; school books are
> often not very practical these days.

> STANDARDS
>      The nice utility conforms to IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 (``POSIX.1'').
> 
> HISTORY
>      A nice utility appeared in Version 4 AT&T UNIX.

nice(1) is standard, and {id|rt}prio(1) are specific to FreeBSD. So
don't blame school books. If they say they describe a POSIX system,
well, that's what they do.

BTW, why does it say `*A* nice utility'?

-- 
DoubleF
Waste not, get your budget cut next year.

--Signature=_Mon__1_Mar_2004_17_25_38_+0300_oVW3dSlo3=PRU1Zf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAQ0ftwo7hT/9lVdwRAl7JAJ9I53llEQeztzn268uXg5tANB0GagCfTvT5
00R2mh0fwzDh3i2rs5uo2y4=
=+eI+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Mon__1_Mar_2004_17_25_38_+0300_oVW3dSlo3=PRU1Zf--