Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 22:34:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org> To: John E Hein <jhein@timing.com> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/36167: _THREAD_SAFE & _REENTRANT used inconsistently Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.55.0306172233420.94125@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> In-Reply-To: <16111.31007.226737.229721@gromit.timing.com> References: <200306172012.h5HKCxal002059@freefall.freebsd.org> <16111.31007.226737.229721@gromit.timing.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, John E Hein wrote: > If the headers don't need them, is the documentation of the -pthread > option in gcc(1) accurate (says -D_THREAD_SAFE should be supplied when > compiling with -pthread)? I assume not. > > If not, then this bug becomes just a documentation bug for -current. I'm afraid this is the case and have just notified the responsible parties. The source of the problem, of course, is that this really shouldn't have been added to the GCC man pages, because it is not related to GCC at all (but a libc issue). Gerald
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.55.0306172233420.94125>