From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 2 20:04:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD98C9B7; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 20:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A41E32C21; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 20:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aurora.physics.berkeley.edu (aurora.Physics.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.117.67]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s62K4mff013251 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:04:49 -0700 Message-ID: <53B465E0.1040309@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 13:04:48 -0700 From: Nathan Whitehorn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marius Strobl , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r268173 - head/sys/conf References: <201407021946.s62JkgHo051426@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201407021946.s62JkgHo051426@svn.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sonic-ID: C;8o/BHiQC5BG47MjHUc16mQ== M;pLgEHyQC5BG47MjHUc16mQ== X-Spam-Flag: No X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 20:04:56 -0000 It worked at least on my Ultra 5 -- though probably because the ATI Mach64 FCode ROM there is substantially shared with the Mac version. It was even reasonably fast. But regardless of whether it's a generally useful console driver on SPARC, at least it proves that vt(4) works fine. -Nathan On 07/02/14 12:46, Marius Strobl wrote: > Author: marius > Date: Wed Jul 2 19:46:42 2014 > New Revision: 268173 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268173 > > Log: > Remove ofwfb(4) in order to fix the LINT build breakage caused by r268069. > Both vt(4) and ofwfb(4) need a lot of love to be usable on sparc64 and even > then the performance of ofwfb(4) would suck compared to hardware accelerated > drivers like creator(4) and machfb(4). > > Modified: > head/sys/conf/files.sparc64 > > Modified: head/sys/conf/files.sparc64 > ============================================================================== > --- head/sys/conf/files.sparc64 Wed Jul 2 19:31:49 2014 (r268172) > +++ head/sys/conf/files.sparc64 Wed Jul 2 19:46:42 2014 (r268173) > @@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ dev/syscons/scterm-teken.c optional sc > dev/syscons/scvtb.c optional sc > dev/uart/uart_cpu_sparc64.c optional uart > dev/uart/uart_kbd_sun.c optional uart sc | vt > -dev/vt/hw/ofwfb/ofwfb.c optional vt > kern/kern_clocksource.c standard > kern/subr_dummy_vdso_tc.c standard > kern/syscalls.c optional ktr >