Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Mar 2001 04:42:50 -0800
From:      "David O'Brien" <TrimYourCc@NUXI.com>
To:        Alex Zepeda <jazepeda@pacbell.net>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: if_fxp - the real point
Message-ID:  <20010309044249.A28945@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010308181307.A3568@zippy.mybox.zip>; from jazepeda@pacbell.net on Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 06:13:07PM -0800
References:  <"Your <5.0.0.25.0.20010308120015.01ee2eb0"@mail.etinc.com> <200103081720.f28HK1201269@guild.plethora.net> <5.0.0.25.0.20010308144541.0281a980@mail.etinc.com> <20010308181307.A3568@zippy.mybox.zip>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 06:13:07PM -0800, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> However, there *ARE* some of us who aren't intimate with your fxp
> problems.

The problem does exist.  I have a board that the `fxp' driver splits this
out for:

    fxp0: warning: unsupported PHY, type = 17, addr = 2
    fxp1: warning: unsupported PHY, type = 17, addr = 2

> You've got a valid problem.  Go away.

"You've got a valid problem, go away."  huh??
His points are very valid about maintenance of the `fxp' driver.
His views on how to make something happen are what is a little out of
touch.

-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
          GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010309044249.A28945>