Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 22:30:57 +0200 From: Marcus von Appen <mva@FreeBSD.org> To: Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net> Cc: koobs@FreeBSD.org, mainland@apeiron.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, python@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: py-imaging vs. py-pillow Message-ID: <20141003203057.GA1053@medusa.sysfault.org> In-Reply-To: <542E677A.7080205@gmx.net> References: <542E677A.7080205@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On, Fri Oct 03, 2014, Stefan Ehmann wrote: > According to freshports there are about 10 ports that depend on > py-pilllow and 50 that depend on py-imaging. > > py-imaging conflicts with py-pilllow. E.g., calibre and xmbc cannot be > installed at the same time. > > > I noticed the problem because calibre switched to py-pilllow recently. > There really should be a way that these packages can coexist. > > (py-imaging/py-pilllow maintainers CCed) I just pushed a patch to https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957, which updates pillow, makes it available for different python versions at the same time and addresses db@'s _imagingtk issue (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193958). This should allow us to migrate the ports to pillow. Cheers Marcus --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQvB4EACgkQi68/ErJnpkdbxgCfSpIBrklQsCkfeCtvD+mnOzei YGcAn1na6b9qtc4LDiHtbHWbYVTBXKcN =i1ha -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141003203057.GA1053>