Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 23:59:38 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>, Anderson Eduardo <listas@secover.com.br> Subject: Re: Using ipfw table names instead of numbers. Message-ID: <4C84915A.1000703@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=Z_wV8rtNqfzPJn8Hg0vat1s-vrmnJsnA0D0mE@mail.gmail.com> References: <4C825094.5040204@secover.com.br> <20100905155311.GA48095@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <4C84364D.9070700@DataIX.net> <AANLkTi=Z_wV8rtNqfzPJn8Hg0vat1s-vrmnJsnA0D0mE@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/05/2010 11:47 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I'd argue that "DNS" clue pushes the firewall out from a packet > inspection thing and into a user-space application inspection thing. It also opens up an attack vector on your firewall. Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C84915A.1000703>