Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:16:33 -0500 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> Cc: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>, Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz>, ports@freebsd.org, Simon Barner <barner@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] Message-ID: <20050728171633.GA11019@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <200507281856.02128.lofi@freebsd.org> References: <C3B81AFDB8A5DFB5AB566CC4@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <200507281856.02128.lofi@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 06:55:56PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > Of course, the regime actually already is in force and > port-submissions with ports@freebsd.org are no longer accepted. I don't know of any port that has been rejected on this account, even though it's what Kris and I have been pushing for. (Committers have been skirting the policy). The only port that I've actively suggested shouldn't be included was for a very specific function that FreeBSD doesn't even support, on the grounds that it seemed unlikely that it would ever be useful to more than one person. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050728171633.GA11019>