Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Mar 1995 00:41:56 -0800 (PST)
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>
To:        hackers@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        faq@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Why IDE is bad
Message-ID:  <199503220841.AAA04565@ref.tfs.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I just made a simple test, this shows why IDE is inferior to SCSI for
FreeBSD:

Western Digital 540 Caviar EIDE disk on IDE controller:
-------------------------------------------------------
dd if=/dev/rwd0d of=/dev/null bs=64k count=8253
	8253+0 records in
	8253+0 records out
	540868608 bytes transferred in 240 secs (2253619 bytes/sec)

Here is what "systat" tells me:
	 2.0%Sys  82.0%Intr  0.5%User  0.0%Nice 15.6%Idle
	|    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |
	=+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Quantum Empire 2100 SCSI-II disk on VL-buslogic controller:
-------------------------------------------------------------
dd if=/dev/rsd0d of=/dev/null bs=64k count=8253
	8253+0 records in
	8253+0 records out
	540868608 bytes transferred in 110 secs (4916987 bytes/sec)

Here is what "systat" tells me:
	 5.6%Sys  20.6%Intr  0.2%User  0.0%Nice 73.6%Idle
	|    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |
	===++++++++++

CONCLUSION:
-----------
The SCSI-controller transfers twice as much data in the same time, and
uses only 25% of the CPU resources the IDE-controller needs.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent'
=> 'no rude people are relevant'



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199503220841.AAA04565>