From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 20:08:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF32737B401 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 20:08:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spam2.snu.ac.kr (spam2.snu.ac.kr [147.46.10.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8802043F85 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 20:08:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lahaye@users.sourceforge.net) Received: (snipe 12033 invoked by alias); 6 May 2003 03:22:42 -0000 Received: from lahaye@users.sourceforge.net with Spamsniper2.0 (Processed in 0.135875 secs); Received: from unknown (HELO sis1.snu.ac.kr) (147.46.10.36) by 0 with SMTP; 6 May 2003 03:22:42 -0000 X-RCPTTO: jtrigg@spamcop.net,freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, Received: from users.sourceforge.net ([147.46.44.183]) by sis1.snu.ac.kr (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4637C2j124396; Tue, 6 May 2003 12:07:13 +0900 Message-ID: <3EB72747.9000104@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 12:08:55 +0900 From: Rob Lahaye Organization: Seoul National University - South Korea User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, ko-kr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: <3EB6F33E.3040108@users.sourceforge.net> <20030506001037.GD5392@grimoire.chen.org.nz> <2147483647.1052171822@[192.168.1.32]> In-Reply-To: <2147483647.1052171822@[192.168.1.32]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portupgrade: installed package "succeeds port" ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 03:08:42 -0000 Jim Trigg wrote: > > Actually, I've found that "cd /usr/ports; make index" is more reliable > than "portsdb -U". Are you sure? "make index" runs for ever here! On a 700 MHz Pentium III PC, it's already running for over an hour, without any indication of doing something useful. The /usr/ports/INDEX file has still size 0. portsdb -U also lasts for a long while, but at least finishes at some point :). Or have I broken anything in the ports administration? But what else is there than the INDEX file? Thanks, Rob.