Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:08:47 +0100
From:      Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
To:        freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Suspend to ram almost work on desktop computer
Message-ID:  <201201102208.47838.hselasky@c2i.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F0C89BD.1010501@gmail.com>
References:  <4F0C64E3.8020500@gmail.com> <201201102006.40527.bschmidt@techwires.net> <4F0C89BD.1010501@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 10 January 2012 19:55:57 David Demelier wrote:
> On 10/01/2012 20:06, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 January 2012 17:18:43 David Demelier wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> 
> >> I have a desktop computer on a Intel DH55HC mainboard. Suspend to ram
> >> almost works on 9.0-RELEASE.
> >> 
> >> The resume works, I can get back to X and it works, started applications
> >> still run but all my USB stuff is dead. I can't use my mouse neither my
> >> keyboard so I can't do anything.
> >> 
> >> This is the last messages :
> >> 
> >> Jan 10 17:08:45 Groseille acpi: suspend at 20120110 17:08:45
> >> Jan 10 17:08:49 Groseille kernel: ugen0.2:<BTC>  at usbus0
> >> (disconnected) Jan 10 17:08:49 Groseille kernel: ukbd0: at uhub0, port
> >> 1, addr 2 (disconnected)
> >> Jan 10 17:08:49 Groseille kernel: uhid0: at uhub0, port 1, addr 2
> >> (disconnected)
> >> Jan 10 17:09:14 Groseille kernel: pcm1: chn_write():
> >> pcm1:virtual:dsp1.vp0: play interrupt timeout, channel dead
> >> Jan 10 17:09:14 Groseille kernel: ugen1.2:<vendor 0x0a12>  at usbus1
> >> (disconnected)
> >> Jan 10 17:09:14 Groseille kernel: ubt0: at uhub1, port 2, addr 2
> >> (disconnected)
> >> Jan 10 17:09:14 Groseille kernel: ugen1.2:<vendor 0x0a12>  at usbus1
> >> Jan 10 17:09:14 Groseille kernel: ubt0:<vendor 0x0a12 EDRClassone,
> >> class 224/1, rev 2.00/19.58, addr 2>  on usbus1
> >> Jan 10 17:09:15 Groseille acpi: resumed at 20120110 17:09:15
> > 
> > Applying the diff of
> > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=199056+0+archive/2012/svn-s
> > rc-head/20120108.svn-src-head should fix that I guess.
> 
> Someone gave me that diff on IRC, I updated all the kernel to -STABLE
> and verified that this diff were present, it is. Unfortunately it didn't
> fixed :(.

Are you running 9-stable?

--HPS



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201201102208.47838.hselasky>