Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 21:44:37 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, f-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: "make -C ..." causes error in net/tkabber/Makefile, line 17 Message-ID: <20040202054437.GA76786@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040202052950.GA97426@moo.holy.cow> References: <20040201213549.GA93666@moo.holy.cow> <20040201220142.GA94541@moo.holy.cow> <20040201221913.GB94541@moo.holy.cow> <20040202001816.GA30336@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040202052950.GA97426@moo.holy.cow>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:29:50AM -0500, parv wrote: > in message <20040202001816.GA30336@xor.obsecurity.org>, > wrote Kris Kennaway thusly... > > > > On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 05:19:13PM -0500, parv wrote: > >=20 > > > ...Should i file a PR to remove useless -C option from man page for > > > 4.8-p14 ? > >=20 > > No..4.8 is not maintained except for security fixes. >=20 > Even though man page & the binary will remain inconsistent w/ each > other? And, as usage of 'make -C <dir>' increases in ports, people > increasingly keep asking about that in one way or other? >=20 > (I just want to be clear i am proposing only a change in > documenation, not the software of make.) Well, you could try asking re@, but typically this isn't done. Kris --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAHePFWry0BWjoQKURAotYAKCsnQMktKVYYYgX4yqaYVSVSlT9ogCcCUkw 7MuJjaA0gu9CXBtdfqSO6Fg= =XshW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040202054437.GA76786>