From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Feb 12 18:40:34 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247A7F109FF for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:40:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [78.47.246.247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EF2A846E8; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:40:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221] (may be forged)) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w1CIeL1c029531 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 19:40:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: ian@freebsd.org Received: from [10.58.0.4] ([10.58.0.4]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w1CIeIMH049364 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Feb 2018 01:40:18 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: FreeBSD on 64MB memory To: Ian Lepore , =?UTF-8?Q?Ask_Bj=c3=b8rn_Hansen?= References: <5FB97479-C49D-4C6E-8416-015ECA656C14@develooper.com> <5A8123CE.9050609@grosbein.net> <5A81D72A.7020408@grosbein.net> <1518460232.94819.25.camel@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <5A81DF8F.7070000@grosbein.net> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 01:40:15 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1518460232.94819.25.camel@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-13 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, LOCAL_FROM, RDNS_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains * 1.9 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on hz.grosbein.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:40:34 -0000 13.02.2018 1:30, Ian Lepore wrote: >>> PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND >>> 911 root 1 22 0 8816K 8844K select 0:39 4.20% ntpd >> Your Soekris system can live without bloated ntpd, use ntpdate or try sntp >> to periodically check your clock with cron, unless you need to re-distribute >> NTP to your LAN. >> > > Heh. I think 1) you don't realize you're saying "you don't need ntpd" > to, and 2) you didn't notice the hostname of the system in some of the > debugging output (ntp1.us.grundclock.com). :) You are partialy right :-) I skipped hostname. Btw, is Soektris system has good enough hardware clock and/or enough horsepower to provide quality public NTP service? Also thinking of lots of garbage traffic these days UDP/123 suffers from...