Date: Wed, 8 Nov 1995 16:42:39 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: FreeBSD hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: Ack! Help, Andrey! I'm having troubles in libdialog! Message-ID: <rZFFBemqP9@ache.dialup.demos.ru> In-Reply-To: <2079.815799713@time.cdrom.com>; from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Tue, 07 Nov 1995 19:01:53 -0800 References: <2079.815799713@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <2079.815799713@time.cdrom.com> Jordan K. Hubbard writes: >> Better solution for it will be passing NULL pointer to dialog functions >> because you not use result[] at all and make them understand NULL >> pointer there. >Well, while we're wishing here.. :-) >A *far far* better solution would be to be able to add callbacks for >each item created, then I'd never even need to parse that &%^%$*!! >result string at all! The original dialog/libdialog was designed for >use from shell scripts, and not from C. The shortcomings of this are >obvious. I can make checklist function understand NULL and do nothing for 'result' arg and pass char array as yet one additional arg, i.e. char hit[nitems]. When function returns, it will have 1 for selected items and 0 for others. Is it what you want here? -- Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed, ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead - http://dt.demos.su/~ache : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead. RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?rZFFBemqP9>