From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Feb 26 04:43:20 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA05358
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 04:43:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from deepo.prosa.dk ([193.89.187.27])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA05350
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 04:43:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from regnauld@localhost)
          by deepo.prosa.dk (8.8.5/8.8.4/prosa-1.1)
	  id NAA09314; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 13:44:55 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <Mutt.19970226134455.regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 13:44:55 +0100
From: regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk (Philippe Regnauld)
To: vince@mail.MCESTATE.COM (Vincent Poy)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [H] Optimal computer for FreeBSD
References: <199702260610.WAA29342@MindBender.serv.net> <Pine.BSF.3.95.970226041234.438z-100000@mail.MCESTATE.COM>
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.58
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2-BETA_A i386
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970226041234.438z-100000@mail.MCESTATE.COM>; from Vincent Poy on Feb 26, 1997 04:14:41 -0800
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Vincent Poy (vince) ecrit/writes:

> improvement EDO ram will give with a non-PBC Cache but if used in
> conjunction with PBC, the increase isn't that big to make much of a
> difference.

	Conclusion: use Parity RAM, but EDO is unnecessary :-)

-- 
							-- Phil

-[ Philippe Regnauld   /   Systems Administrator   /    regnauld@prosa.dk ]-
-[ Location.: +55.4N +11.3E       PGP Key: finger regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk ]-