Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 01:12:59 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com> To: "Scot W. Hetzel" <hetzels@westbend.net> Cc: alex@aspenworks.com, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mod_php4 + ssl + flash Message-ID: <20000912011259.A47559@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <052501c01c76$58dbeaa0$8dfee0d1@westbend.net>; from hetzels@westbend.net on Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 12:00:18AM -0500 References: <XFMail.000910184442.shurick@zenon.net> <39BBB3D4.86DE5AFC@aspenworks.com> <052501c01c76$58dbeaa0$8dfee0d1@westbend.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ redirect from -isp --> -ports ] On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 12:00:18AM -0500, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: > I had created such a port for the FreeBSD Apache Modualarization Project: > > http://www.westbend.net/~hetzels/mod_apache13-1.tgz > > Unfortunately, it (apache13-base) won't be imported into the FreeBSD Ports Collection, as I received a few comments that it isn't > needed. The apache situation is out of hand. We have far too many different theories of what is the right way, and none of them agree. Scot's work has worked perfectly for me when I tried it on scratch machines, why aren't we importing it and ditching the existing scheme? -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000912011259.A47559>