Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:33:07 -0400 From: Michael Butler <imb@protected-networks.net> To: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sudo through ssh broken on -current? Message-ID: <4F5D4443.8060603@protected-networks.net> In-Reply-To: <4F5D3FDB.1020700@protected-networks.net> References: <4F5D3B56.4010702@protected-networks.net> <20120312000750.GA1758@glenbarber.us> <4F5D3FDB.1020700@protected-networks.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/11/12 20:14, Michael Butler wrote: > On 03/11/12 20:07, Glen Barber wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 07:55:02PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote: >>> I noted some thing odd when executing the following .. >>> >>> /home/imb> ssh imb@xxxx "sudo /sbin/ipfw list" >>> >>> sudo: (malloc) /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c:2644: Failed assertion: >>> "(run->regs_mask[elm] & (1U << bit)) == 0" >>> Abort >>> >>> Adding '-t' as a parameter to ssh runs without the assert, >>> > >> What is 'uname -a'? > > client is FreeBSD 7.4-STABLE #11: Fri Mar 2 20:44:44 EST 2012 > server is FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #23: Sun Mar 11 18:46:14 EDT 2012 > > Both are i386. > > Another interesting point: if run as part of a script, with no > controlling tty, '-t' (or '-n', for that matter) produces the assertion :-( Client version appears to not be relevant - occurs when executed from the same SVN of -current, imb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk9dREIACgkQQv9rrgRC1JJIhgCdEl8f2ALP9R9gmlPwJQ/LYXdw YdsAn2ZNmBtL9QsKpegU8Mvo70CCGbLd =vs1t -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F5D4443.8060603>