From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Aug 25 22:10: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFCEC153EC for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 22:10:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id WAA61467; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 22:10:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 22:10:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199908260510.WAA61467@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: ports/13370: elm-port upgraded, improved Reply-To: Mikhail Teterin Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/13370; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mikhail Teterin To: Will Andrews Cc: ache@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/13370: elm-port upgraded, improved Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 01:08:46 -0400 (EDT) Will Andrews once wrote: >I received word that elm 2.5 was out some time ago. Let me know where it is! I did not see anything newer then +60 on the usual ftp://ftp.ozone.fmi.fi/KEH/ ... > However, my attempts at upgrading the mail/elm port (from 2.4ME+54 to > 2.5.1) were not 100% successful. If you would like to have a look at > the work I've done, let me know. > > Or, you can leave this upgrade to be committed and (try to make a > 2.4ME+64->2.5 upgrade or ignore elm 2.5 altogether). The one I submitted is definetly better then what we had. Until I take a look at 2.5, that's all I can say :) -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message