From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Tue Mar 6 12:34:53 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E18F2D1E4 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2018 12:34:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from mail.rlwinm.de (mail.rlwinm.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:171:f902::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C85F574BE0 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2018 12:34:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from crest.bultmann.eu (unknown [IPv6:2a00:c380:c0d5:1:35d5:38fc:d387:8188]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rlwinm.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85CDE1484B for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2018 12:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: OpenRC 0.35 for FreeBSD To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <20180302083756.GH34685@e.0x20.net> <35AC3784-D02B-4EB1-9F82-E522B7A7730E@FreeBSD.org> From: Jan Bramkamp Message-ID: Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 13:34:46 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <35AC3784-D02B-4EB1-9F82-E522B7A7730E@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 12:34:53 -0000 On 02.03.18 17:11, Jonathan Anderson wrote: > On 2 Mar 2018, at 12:13, Jonathan Anderson wrote: >> >> [...] there are a number of options that I've heard of vying for >> consideration: >> >>  - finit >>  - jobd (is this still a thing?) >>  - nosh >>  - OpenRC >>  - runit > > Oh, and also s6: https://skarnet.org/software/s6/why.html I've run s6 + s6-rc as init replacement for FreeBSD 11.1 on my laptop for over a year. The init_path kenv simplifies testing alternative init systems a lot. It works really well and required only minimal porting.