From owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 14:51:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7EF9B2F19 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:51:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from forward11h.cmail.yandex.net (forward11h.cmail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f35::9c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDEE3387 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:51:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from web7h.yandex.ru (web7h.yandex.ru [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f05::17]) by forward11h.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 8AB1A219EB; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:50:59 +0300 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web7h.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id BDB126920B26; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:50:58 +0300 (MSK) Received: by web7h.yandex.ru with HTTP; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:50:58 +0300 From: Alexander V. Chernikov Envelope-From: melifaro@ipfw.ru To: Ian Smith , Julian Elischer Cc: "freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <20150803234952.O17327@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <55BF368A.60004@elischer.org> <20150803234952.O17327@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Subject: Re: ipfw delete 100-300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <925201438613458@web7h.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:50:58 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 14:51:04 -0000 03.08.2015, 17:14, "Ian Smith" : > On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:38:18 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > š> my reading of the code I can see that 'ipfw delete 100-300' doesn't > š> work (well I know it doesn't work, but I had thought it was a bug), > š> Now I see that its just 'not supported' I implemented the kernel range deletion, but converted userland part as-is. Should work on HEAD now (r286232). > š> > š> It may be my imagination but (distant) past? > > I was surprised too; ISTR having used that before too, but I may > misremember remembering .. I also had a feeling that this syntax should work (maybe because it silently accepted "ranged" queries) but I couldn't find any presence of real ranged deletion support in SVN. > > On 9.3 with rules 100-1000 in 100's, 'ipfw delete 600-800' deletes only > 600 .. without complaint, returning 0 if 600 existed. NG for scripts. > > cheers, Ian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"