From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Aug 26 0:54:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail.scc.nl (node1374.a2000.nl [62.108.19.116]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E461515382 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 00:54:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@scc.nl) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by mail.scc.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA26913 for ports@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 09:39:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@scc.nl) Received: from GATEWAY by dwarf.hq.scc.nl with netnews for ports@FreeBSD.ORG (ports@FreeBSD.ORG) To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 09:39:33 +0200 From: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <37C4EF35.7B5B0C1C@scc.nl> Organization: SCC vof Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <19990825170011.B14625@area51.fremont.ca.us> Subject: Re: rar and linux_rar port conflict Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Michael Haro wrote: > > Hi, both rar and linux_rar ports install stuff into ${PREFIX}/share/doc/rar > and a rar.1 catpage. Would it be correct to make linux_rar install > linux_rar.1 and ${PREFIX}/share/doc/linux_rar? What about linux_rar installing under /compat/linux? BTW: what's the functional difference between linux_rar and rar? -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ Amsterdam, The Netherlands tel: +31 20 4200655 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message