Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 18:32:58 -0500 From: eculp <eculp@encontacto.net> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Problem with apr1 that could be shared with libX11 and libSM that I have reported previously. Message-ID: <20100520183258.12803uuar50i044k@econet.encontacto.net> In-Reply-To: <4BF58E14.3050000@FreeBSD.org> References: <20100520142452.111014tebuyeocqo@econet.encontacto.net> <4BF58E14.3050000@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>: > On 5/20/2010 12:24 PM, eculp wrote: >> I used postmaster and the results for trying to builds apr1 can be seen >> at http://www.vitalagua.mx//apr1.txt >> >> To me it seems to be related to configuration versions of tools like >> automake and autoconf but I can't find it. > > This doesn't look like a portmaster problem, can you try again =20 > simply building in the port directory and see if you get the same =20 > result? Doug, I apologize for having even insinuated that postmaster might be =20 at fault. My intention was the complete opposite. Using postmaster, =20 is for me, security and helps keep me from making as many errors. I am sorry that it didn't come out that way. My excuse is that 95% of =20 my writing is in Spanish. I have a feeling that my problem is an old port, somehow related to =20 make and conf tools or family that is causing strange messages about =20 outdated what ever. I can't build the new xorg, kde and others for =20 errors like this one and libX1, libSM and others. Thanks, ed > > > Doug > > > --=20 > > =09... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. > =09=09=09-- Propellerheads > > =09Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with > =09a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100520183258.12803uuar50i044k>