From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 16 14:31:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dt050n71.san.rr.com (dt050n71.san.rr.com [204.210.31.113]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2092114CE7 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 1999 14:31:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt050n71.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA67891; Sat, 16 Oct 1999 14:31:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <3808EEBB.CCEFE894@gorean.org> Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 14:31:39 -0700 From: Doug Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT-0927 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug White Cc: "Nawfal M. Rouyan" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: problem making kernel... References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Doug White wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, Doug wrote: > > > Doug White wrote: > > > > > Someone forgot "controller scbus0". > > > > Shouldn't /usr/sbin/config error out on this condition? There is no way > > that the compile can succeed, so I'd like to see config cut this cycle > > short. > > I wouldn't want config(8) getting that smart. We'd have to generate a > dependency tree on kernel options, which would get ugly fast. I agree that it's a slippery slope, however I would think that some of the big fat dependencies would be easy to handle. Oh well, just a thought. Doug -- "Stop it, I'm gettin' misty." - Mel Gibson as Porter, "Payback" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message