Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:55:46 -0700 (PDT) From: "Neal E. Westfall" <nwestfal@directvinternet.com> To: Joshua Lee <yid@softhome.net> Cc: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr, <chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Why did evolution fail? Message-ID: <20020910095307.X62741-100000@Tolstoy.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <20020909231609.68ac5883.yid@softhome.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Joshua Lee wrote: > On Fri, 6 Sep 2002 18:30:52 -0700 (PDT) > "Neal E. Westfall" <nwestfal@directvinternet.com> wrote: > > > Correction. Logic and ethics are meaningless without objective > > standards, and objective standards are impossible without appealing > > to something, well, *objective*. "Objective" means that it comes to > > you from the outside, externally, i.e. "not subjective". So > > No, "objective" can operate according to natural law without having to > appeal to an external source. e.g. Kantian ethics. ROFL. You think Kantian ethics are objective? BTW, please explain how you get ethics from "natural law". That's a joke, right? Neal To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020910095307.X62741-100000>