Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:32:14 +0930 From: "Wilkinson, Alex" <alex.wilkinson@dsto.defence.gov.au> To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP Message-ID: <20050421020214.GU27439@squash.dsto.defence.gov.au> In-Reply-To: <20050416211000.GF784@empiric.icir.org> References: <20050415173711.I658@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <20050416150810.GD5452@empiric.icir.org> <86ll7i30mc.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050416211000.GF784@empiric.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
0n Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 02:10:00PM -0700, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
>In terms of code quality and design, I've found it far nicer to work with than
>the equivalent Linux offering. Besides, I think being able to have native
>ADSL connectivity on a *BSD machine is a good thing.
>
>Deprecating NATM for the 6.0 lifetime would affect several users, developers
>and committers who are working towards this. I'd be more than happy to see
>ng_pppoa go in for 6.0, though.
>
>[That would be an excellent idea - being able to run MPD on top of ATM would
>let us do native xDSL channel bonding on FreeBSD.]
Bruce what exactly do u mean by "native ADSL connectivity" ?
- aW
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050421020214.GU27439>